concurrency-benchmarks | concurrency-benchmarks for languages

by deepu105 Rust Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | concurrency-benchmarks Summary

concurrency-benchmarks is a Rust library. concurrency-benchmarks has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

concurrency-benchmarks for languages

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

concurrency-benchmarks has a low active ecosystem.

It has 18 star(s) with 7 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 1 open issues and 1 have been closed. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of concurrency-benchmarks is current.

Quality

concurrency-benchmarks has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

concurrency-benchmarks has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

concurrency-benchmarks code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

concurrency-benchmarks is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

concurrency-benchmarks releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of concurrency-benchmarks

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

concurrency-benchmarks Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for concurrency-benchmarks.

concurrency-benchmarks Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for concurrency-benchmarks.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on concurrency-benchmarks

A simple Java HTTP server fails with ApacheBench but works fine on a browser

Rust vs Go concurrent webserver, why is Rust slow here?

QUESTION

A simple Java HTTP server fails with ApacheBench but works fine on a browser

Asked 2021-Jan-25 at 15:45

As part of a concurrency blog series, I was building the simplest HTTP server in different languages (Java, Kotlin, Rust, Go, JS, TS) and everything works fine for everything except Java/Kotlin, aka on the JVM. All the code can be found here. The below is the server code in Java, I tried a traditional Thread based one and an AsynchronousServerSocketChannel based one, but regardless when I run a benchmark with ApacheBench it fails with Broken pipe and apr_socket_recv: Connection reset by peer (104) this is weird as similar setup in other languages works fine. The problem here happens only with ApacheBench, coz when I access the URL in a browser it just works fine. SO I'm banging my head to figure out what is going on. I tried to play with keep-alive etc but doesn't seem to help. I looked at a bunch of examples of something similar and I don't see anything special being done anywhere. I'm hoping someone can figure out what is going wrong here as it definitely seems to be something to do with JVM + APacheBench. I have tried this with Java 11 and 15 but it's the same result.

Java Thread Sample (hello.html can be any HTML file)

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jan-22 at 18:08

Wanted to ask if tried with setting 127.0.0.1 instead of localhost

InetAddress addr = InetAddress.getByName("127.0.0.1"); ServerSocket sock = new ServerSocket(1234, 50, addr);

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65849156

QUESTION

Rust vs Go concurrent webserver, why is Rust slow here?

Asked 2020-Nov-27 at 09:20

I was trying out some benchmarking of the multi-threaded webserver example in the Rust book and for comparison I built something similar in Go and ran a benchmark using ApacheBench. Though its a simple example the difference was way too much. Go web server doing the same was 10 times faster. Since I was expecting Rust to be faster or at same level, I tried multiple revisions using futures and smol (Though my goal was to compare implementations using only standard library) but result was almost the same. Can anyone here suggest changes to the Rust implementation to make it faster without using a huge thread count?

Here is the code I used: https://github.com/deepu105/concurrency-benchmarks

The tokio-http version is the slowest, the other 3 rust versions give almost same result

Here are the benchmarks:

Rust (with 8 threads, with 100 threads the numbers are closer to Go):

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Nov-26 at 19:41

I only compared your "rustws" and the Go version. In Go you have unlimited goroutines (even though you limit them all to only one CPU core) while in rustws you create a thread pool with 8 threads.

Since your request handlers sleep 2 seconds for every 10th request you are limiting the rustws version to 80/2 = 40 requests per second which is what you are seeing in the ab results. Go does not suffer from this arbitrary bottleneck so it shows you the maximum it candle handle on a single CPU core.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65027589

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install concurrency-benchmarks

You can download it from GitHub.
Rust is installed and managed by the rustup tool. Rust has a 6-week rapid release process and supports a great number of platforms, so there are many builds of Rust available at any time. Please refer rust-lang.org for more information.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: