illumination | mardown renderer | Code Editor library

I have been struggling all week with this emailer I need to send out very soon. I need to center these product images alongside their descriptions and I cannot seem to navigate my way through this template an agency handed over.

I have tried changing display properties and adding numerous other properties and methods such as adding top padding (this works visually in the builder but upon a test it still sits stuck to the top of the table). This emailer is made entirely in HTML with inline CSS elements and there is a class denotated for these tables however I cannot find the 'global' CSS attribute for them within this HTML.

I am fairly new to all of this so sorry if the question seems vague. I have attached a screenshot of the problem.

As you can see, the product images are aligned to the top of the table and they can't move to the centre of the description no matter what I try:

.

So, I'm developing an automated illumination system for commercial purposes, and I intend to use Google Cloud IoT Core for managing device communications.

Users will use an app on their smartphones to manage their lights at their homes. On the app they'll create an account and register those lights. Then they'll be able to control their brightness, etc.

My question is: How do I structure my project on Google Cloud IoT to limit user access to their own devices, in case someone maliciously modifies my smartphone application (worst case example)?

On Google Cloud IoT we have following structure:

Project > registry > device

Since the registry amount is limited to 100, it's not a viable solution to create 1 registry per user.

I thought about using the backend of the application as a middleware between the Google Cloud and the app, but using that would kinda double the data traffic, essentially doubling the costs of maintaining the project, and the backend would have to be much more robust to handle the traffic:

This would be the backend acting as a middleware:

User > App > Backend > Google Cloud IoT > Backend > App

This would be the structure I would like, but I don't know if it's possible:

User > App > Google Cloud IoT > App

Is there any way to do this?

I have a list (an array of objects), in which they can have parents or not.

So recently I tried to make a bot to fish in Minecraft as a challenge. (not that I use it in any community, or modify the game`s code so I guess its ok with TOS) My approach was and stays so far to track the movements of the bob.

My first bot relied on color space segmentation and finetuning the image with morphological transformations from OpenCV-python (as part of my learning experience I aimed to make the bot purely computer vision based). That bot only worked in specific location where I set illumination and environment color with in-game methods. Also it worked at expense of turning games graphics to lowest settings to disable particles.

My second bot used HAAR-like classifiers, since I already made few models for real life objects which were fairly good. Sadly this time (I assume due to the game`s unique graphic style where essentially everything is a cube with textures mapped on it) it was fairly inconsistent and caused a lot of false positives.

My third bot used HOG-features based svm but it was fairly slow for all models ranging from more then 4000 original samples with really fit bounding boxes to about 200, due to that lack of speed fish was of the hook when detection occurred.

My last attempt used tensor flow lite and failed miserably due to even worse detection speed.

I also looked into possibility of doing motion detection by comparing the consequent frames, and speed benefits of java vs python, as well as different preprocessing options like increasing contrast, reducing color pallet and etc.

AT this point I don't know if wondering 'blind' will give me any clues on what would be the 'to go' approach, and hence I decided to ask here.

Thanks in advance.

P.S. For exact specifics - I think the time to reel is approximately 0.7 seconds but I can be slightly off.

What would be the best way to achieve this in Laravel? I'm mentioning Laravel specifically because I'm still rather new to Laravel. I'm trying to implement it therein, and I'm sure there's an aspect of Laravel that I'm not familiar with yet that will solve this elegantly.

Let me clarify with a simple example:

The original design

Suppose you have a car model:

Trying to stand up a relatively simple ASA query to pull data being ingested as an Array. The piece I cant seem to figure out is how to have the returned table auto populate columns for each Key. Meaning we need each row to have a column for Temperature Value, Humidity Value, Illumination Value, and Contact Value if it exists. Some other arrays will only have Key: Temperature and Key: Humidity.

Thanks!

I am attempting to address the age old issue of model vs world space coordinates when adding light to a scene with transformed models.

I have a house model with two instances. a skull, a single point light in my scene as well as some terrain and a skybox. I noticed that when applying some rotations to my models, the illumination provided by the point light was rotating with it. After some reading it became obvious that I am doing all of my computations in my shaders in model space but my light position/directions are in world space.

So, I realized I needed to uniform my space for my calculations and I think it makes sense to keep the shaders in model space and convert the light components from world to model.

When I don't do the transformation it looks almost right (though not perfect which I'm betting is b/c of the different spaces). I render a small lightbulb model at the location of the light and the tops of the houses and the terrain all illuminate as I expect relatively well.

When I do the conversion of the light position back to model space I'm expecting the light to still be illuminating from the lightbulb model. However it gets wonky.

I have no rotations on the models but some minor translations so I'm confused as to why it seems like the light source gets rotated 90 degrees around the x axis...

Scenario: let's say I have a shader program implementing basic illumination and coloring (phong + multiple texture maps) in OpenGL. Since all my objects in the scene should look the same (except textures), I thought to just bind the same shader program for each object and just update the uniforms (MVP matrix, normal matrix and about 20 object specific properties).

My question: since glUniform calls are not exactly free, should I clone my program in order drastically cut down on glUniform calls? Sharing it, I would only need to update the MVP and normal matrix.

There is a problem with run Unity project on Hyper-V virtual machine. To make a long story short, my Unity project is working on my PC, but doesn't work on a VM. I described this in detail here:

https://stackoverflow.com/q/65550732/5709159.

I found a crash log where Unity wrote everything. Because there is a restriction on number of chars that I can post on stack overflow I uploaded the full file here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xAtTUytNGH7WFSSIr8WGotCDrvQKW9f-/view, and here I just posted the last part of this file: