ruffle | A Flash Player emulator written in Rust | Emulator library

setImge is for updating image state. If you wanna use the image List as a state. You should do as below.

Although I don't have a precise and definite answer to your problem, as a Flash-ninja who's been with the technology for almost 20 years I will share some insights as will shed some light on the technical nuances, which is — alas — exceeds the comment limits by far.

1. Why does the Ruffle Flash Player play it better than the official one?

A Flash application goes in a form of an SWF file, which also might have some external extras to download (text, binary, images and also additional SWF modules). There are multiple factors that might render an application unusable.

Why downloaded SWF might fail:

• You download the main file, but not the additional files (personally I think this is the cause).
• Application is URL-locked.
• Application has a server back-end it cannot reach because it tries to access it via a relative URL.
• Application has a server back-end it cannot reach because it is published with local-with-files security which doesn't matter via HTTP but matters if you run the application locally.

Why SWF by URL might fail:

• Flash treats relative URLs in a very weird way: relatively to the current top-frame location on the current HTML page. If SWF is in different folder than the HTML it belongs to, then relative URLs could lead who knows where.
• Application has a server back-end which rejects requests because SWF without HTML page does not have a valid session.
• Application gets its settings (or checks the environment) from its HTML page which is not present in case of direct SWF link.

Well, then.

1. More importantly, how do I fix it entirely, or at least the Muscles section?

Per suggestion above, try to figure (monitor the requests from the working application somehow) all the downloadable additions to the main file and download them as well — then the downloaded version just might work.

Otherwise, there's not much you can do, because of this. As you can see, Ruffle is still far from supporting Flash and ActionScript completely, one incompatible instruction — and the whole application just fails and will continue to fail until Ruffle covers the said instruction as well.

You could use a regex built on out_list:

NB. assuming out_list = ['collar', 'floralprint', 'longsleeve', 'pink', 'pintuck', 'red', 'shirt', 'sleeve', 'sleeveless', 'split', 'trim', 'tunic', 'v-neck']

I would do something like this, I think must be better options but it works... so it's better than nothing

The thing is as I found out in Ruffle forum, this latest version of Ruffle SDK is not so well handled in Chrome 91 on Android, and should be in future update of Chrome 92.

Therefore, I used SDK from the site I noticed that Ruffle/Flash objects were working OK (turns out it was Ruffle ver from January):

https://www.albinoblacksheep.com/script/ruffle_nightly_2021_01_26_selfhosted/aafdd926c74ff1ff1e03a02091c0405b.wasm https://www.albinoblacksheep.com/script/ruffle_nightly_2021_01_26_selfhosted/ruffle.js

I imported in my site and it works (almost) fine.

You are simply using wrong locator.
Try this

It seems that this is a known issue filed on bugzilla.

The geckodriver devs also say that the WebDriver spec needs to be updated. See: w3c/webdriver#350.

However, CAVAh has found and posted a workaround for this issue here.

Following the advice to return the children of shadowroot return arguments[0].shadowRoot.children it finds 4 elements:

The C++ answer is to skip using C arrays, which have limitations in C++ not present in C, and instead use std::vector:

The most simple way would be only copying the given elements with this template: