rjs | An implementation of ECMAScript | Parser library

There are three arguments that let you work with type definitions. From ack --help:

We can negate the whole expression (lvl == "Wsl" & mkt == "Chi") with !

You can't write HTML on js file. you need to switch to jsx ( Javascript XML ) file format.

Rename your files to Cards.js => Cards.jsx and CardUI.js => CardUI.jsx

There are a number of different ways you could solve this, you don't provide much in terms of requirements so these would need to finessed to meet your needs.

Note: Using Nunjuck's truncate filter against rich-text (markup) will include all HTML tags and spaces in code against the truncate limit. The examples below use Nunjuck's truncate. This could lead to broken tags in your markup, should a tag be opened, the limit be reached, and then never closed. I would recommend implementing something like truncate-html as a project-level Nunjucks helper. See Implementing custom Nunjucks helpers in Apostrophe

In the schema for your piece, when defining the body area, add some flag to your apostrophe-rich-text options

What you are trying to do doesn't seem right for me. This type of testing (controller tests is) for testing the response of action and rendering. so you shouldn't do that you should test the output of the rendering of the action. otherwise, if you wanted to test the method show only (unit testing) don't use get here you can do this

Provided I haven't misunderstood your explanation:

• option 1, from what you've said, you'll probably want to keep the loop and maintain a coroutine for each /dest.
• option 2, don't do that. If you're trying to share information between a fork and main/other fork you'll want to use a (sync.)waitgroup or better yet, (sync.)condition. If you leave a for exp {} in a coroutine waiting for some shared resource to change, this will eat cpu and cause a whole lot of slowdown. Even if you use a sleep in there, it trades off wasted cpu for wasted runtime and lack of coordination. Sync.condition wait() use will actually suspend the routine--allowing other routines to run in its stead, and waitgroup is a perfectly reasonable option as well.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but hopefully I was of some help.

To be honest the reasoning for using react-native-web are somewhat aesthetic, take this for example:

React Native is a pure UI language. It defines some base components that define UI primitives, and those are thought to be independent of the platform that runs them. All the components we can create in React Native is based on primitives like View, Text, or Image, which are basic elements that make sense to any visual interface, no matter where it is run.

On the other hand, React’s primitives are just DOM nodes — HTML tags like div, p, or a, which are not pure UI. They weren’t created to define a visual language; rather, they’re meant to structure and make sense of the hypertext. React’s primitives have meaning beyond the interface, and that meaning doesn’t make much sense outside of browsers.

which is taken from here. I developed both ReactJs and RN applications and websites and the only true benefit that I can see is the unified coding language. Since I started with RN and then added ReactJS to my resume, I found it a pain in the butt to find the equivalent of RN components in ReactJs, oh I should use p and span instead of Text?, oh shoot it is 'input type="text"' not 'TextInput' etc etc. I think you get my point. Probably it is same for React developers who came into RN world. But it comes with its cons too and unfortunately using react-native-web need some hassles and you have to PREPARE your project for it.

thanks for your explanation. Could you please be more specific and provide more details or examples for the "some hassles"? thanks!

For example React-Native (and some its libraries) are based upon Promise framework which is not normal JS, or Object.assign is added ES6, in order to use them you have to modify webpack.config.js and .bael-rc files add multiple lines inside those files. If you are using other helper tools like Flow or Jest or etc they had to be configured too. It sure slows you down at start but if you dedicate the time to set things up it pays of in long run.

I fixed it by moving the enablePlugins in the main sbt file:

Without having credentials, i can't validate your problem. Only some general hints

1. keep the WebClient setup as simple as possible, the defaults are usually good. From my point of view you need only