tracing | Application level tracing for Rust

In case this is helpful to anyone else, turns out my version for "next" was set to "^11.1.0" and the standalone folder only works for "next" versions "^12.1.0" and above. Updating my package.json fixed the problem!

The issue is that your compile SDK is 31, you are targetting API 31 (Android 12) and not setting the exported attribute.

You need to specify android:exported="true" in the manifest.

If your app targets Android 12 and contains activities, services, or broadcast receivers that use intent filters, you must explicitly declare the android: exported attribute for these app components.

My colleague solved it by moving to Vite. My suggestion would be to drop webpack and use Vite instead.

Migration guide for Vue 2 to 3 here: https://v3-migration.vuejs.org/ Vuetify migration guide: https://next.vuetifyjs.com/en/getting-started/upgrade-guide

Unfortunately (?), the easiest way to know for sure what those categories map to is to look at OpenJDK source code. The NMT tag you are looking for is mtServiceability. This would show that "serviceability" are basically diagnostic interfaces in JDK/JVM: JVMTI, heap dumps, etc.

But the same kind of thing is clear from observing that stack trace sample you are showing mentions ThreadStackTrace::dump_stack_at_safepoint -- that is something that dumps the thread information, for example for jstack, heap dump, etc. If you have a suspicion for the memory leak in that code, you might try to build a MCVE demonstrating it, and submitting the bug against OpenJDK, or showing it to a fellow OpenJDK developer. You probably know better what your application is doing to cause thread dumps, focus there.

That being said, I don't see any obvious memory leaks in StackFrameInfo, neither can I reproduce any leak with stress tests, so maybe what you are seeing is "just" thread dumping over the larger and larger thread stacks. Or you capture it when thread dump is happening. Or... It is hard to say without the MCVE.

Update: After playing with MCVE, I realized that it reproduces with 17.0.1, but not with either mainline development JDK, or JDK 18 EA, or JDK 17.0.2 EA. I tested with 17.0.2 EA before, so was not seeing it, dang. Bisection between 17.0.1 and 17.0.2 EA shows it was fixed with JDK-8273902 backport. 17.0.2 releases this week, so the bug should disappear after you upgrade.

I've read over the paper to get a sense of what algorithm they're proposing, and it's actually not that bad when you get the hang of it.

The basic idea is the following. We have a two-argument version of the Ackermann function defined as follows:

• A(0, n) = n + 1
• A(i, 0) = A(i - 1, 1)
• A(i, n) = A(i - 1, A(i, n - 1))

The approach the authors suggest is essentially a space-optimized, bottom-up calculation of the Ackermann function. Rather than give the final version of their algorithm, let's see if we can instead derive it from the above rules. We'll imagine filling in a 2D table where each row corresponds to a different value of i and each column corresponds to a value of n. Following the convention from the paper, we'll place the row for i = 0 on top, like this:

First you need to create blob file in case of active storage.

Solved! After 2 hours, we finally found the culprit: a Hubspot (CRM) script imported in index.html ... (apparently it broke the HTML structure)

We removed the

TL;DR these are the headers so that jaeger or zipkin can track individual requests. This application is responsible for their proper propagation. Additionally, they are request headers and not response header, so everything works fine.

Explanation:

It looks okay. First, let's start with what these requests are:

As discussed in the comments you should update your webpack configuration to handle loading svg files. inside the module.rules array you should add the following: