FingerTree | Scala implementation of the versatile | Functional Programming library

by Sciss Scala Version: Current License: LGPL-2.1

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets(3)Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | FingerTree Summary

FingerTree is a Scala library typically used in Programming Style, Functional Programming applications. FingerTree has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Weak Copyleft License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

A Scala implementation of the versatile purely functional data structure of the same name.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

FingerTree has a low active ecosystem.

It has 60 star(s) with 3 fork(s). There are 5 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 3 open issues and 4 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 3 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of FingerTree is current.

Quality

FingerTree has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

FingerTree has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

FingerTree code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

FingerTree is licensed under the LGPL-2.1 License. This license is Weak Copyleft.

Weak Copyleft licenses have some restrictions, but you can use them in commercial projects.

Reuse

FingerTree releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of FingerTree

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

FingerTree Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for FingerTree.

FingerTree Examples and Code Snippets

FingerTree,using,Ranged sequence

Scala

Lines of Code : 18

License : Weak Copyleft (LGPL-2.1)

Copy

import de.sciss.fingertree._

val sq = RangedSeq(
  (1685, 1750) -> "Bach",
  (1866, 1925) -> "Satie",
  (1883, 1947) -> "Russolo",
  (1883, 1965) -> "Varèse",
  (1910, 1995) -> "Schaeffer",
  (1912, 1992) -> "Cage"
)(_._1, Ordering

FingerTree,using,Ordered sequence

Scala

Lines of Code : 7

License : Weak Copyleft (LGPL-2.1)

Copy

import de.sciss.fingertree._

val sym = Seq(("Cs", 55), ("Fr", 87), ("K", 19), ("Li", 3), ("Na", 11), ("Rb", 37))
val sq  = OrderedSeq(sym: _*)(_._2, Ordering.Int)
val li  = sq.toList // List((Li,3), (Na,11), (K,19), (Rb,37), (Cs,55), (Fr,87))
val ce

FingerTree,using,Indexed and summed sequence

Scala

Lines of Code : 6

License : Weak Copyleft (LGPL-2.1)

Copy

import de.sciss.fingertree._

implicit val m = Measure.SummedIntInt
val sq = IndexedSummedSeq[Int,Int]((1 to 10).map(i => i * i): _*)
sq.sum  // result: 385
sq.sumUntil(sq.size/2)  // result: 55

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on FingerTree

Fingertree head complexity

QUESTION

Fingertree head complexity

Asked 2019-May-09 at 14:30

I was just reading Apfelmus' excellent introduction to Finger Trees for the second time and started to wonder about his implementation of head:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-May-09 at 14:30

Yes, head and head' should have the same time complexity if handed to GHC. I would expect a small constant-factor difference in favor of head (maybe 60% confident of this -- the list fusion optimization stuff is pretty wild when it works).

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56061160

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network