enterprise | Code coverage done right. On-premise enterprise version | Dashboard library

I received an official response for the reCAPTCHA Enterprise support team:

Thanks for reaching out here. We recommend not putting a checkbox behind a score. More details are available on this here: https://cloud.google.com/recaptcha-enterprise/docs/faq#id_like_to_use_the_score_from_to_show_a_challenge_checkbox_widget_how_can_i_do_this

Not only are there concerns listed in that FAQ point about the efficacy of a checkbox widget when placed behind a score, but it also over simplifies how the checkbox widget works. We perform "adversarial challenging" on our checkbox widget (essentially, we show harder challenges to known attackers), but we're unable to do so when placed behind a score reCAPTCHA.

All of this being said, if you do wish to do it anyway, you would have to include the JS file twice.

And this is from the link posted in their email:

I'd like to use the score from reCAPTCHA Enterprise to show a challenge / checkbox widget. How can I do this?

We recommend that you do not do this. reCAPTCHA Enterprise expects to see both good and bad user behavior on implementation. If you trigger a reCAPTCHA Enterprise checkbox widget based on a reCAPTCHA Enterprise score, the checkbox widget is only being exposed to bad traffic. Due to this, the widget can have a more difficult time determining whether to show a challenge or not. This can result in issuing NO CAPTCHAs (no challenge shown at all) to fraudulent users or bots due to trouble making that differentiation.

In these cases, we recommend just using a challenge-based site key upfront (like reCAPTCHA Enterprise with a CHECKBOX Site Key) instead, but installing a SCORE Site Key on every page, as well as issuing grecaptcha.enterprise.execute to train the model, but foregoing assessments on the SCORE tokens. Essentially, this achieves the goal by training the reCAPTCHA Enterprise CHECKBOX site keys on user behavior, resulting in less challenges shown to legitimate users and more challenges to fraudulent ones.

The version ID value inside your string appears to be surrounded with double quotes. Also, I suggest making the decimal portion optional, in case some versions might not have a minor version component:

This issue was solved by Shiva's comment, add it as the answer to close the question:

Some apps call Microsoft Graph using their own identity and not on behalf of a user. For example, the Mail.Read application permission allows apps to read mail in all mailboxes without a signed-in user.

Configuring ApplicationAccessPolicy is used to limit the app access to a specific set of mailboxes.

1.Connect to Exchange Online PowerShell

Thanks Hernando - MSFT for helping me. The Accept button in the Licence agreemnet window can be clicked by moving back and forth the hand using W,A,S,D keys.

Previously i thought that i should click using a raycast pointer. It would be nice if i can click using raycast because the current approach is very difficult for any new users.

Additionally, sometimes mouse and keyboard inputs doesn't worked for me. This is because the 'Use Mouse' and 'Use Keyboard' check-boxes under the Simulation Panel is disabled. We have to ensure they are enabled for using mouse and keyboard for simulation inputs.

CQRS being an architectural pattern, you can most definitely do CQRS in vanilla Spring Boot. It might require you to break up the read side and write side in separately deployed services and manually arrange to keep them eventually consistent.

Jersey requires an appropriate container module to deploy the REST application. You added jersey-container-jdk-http, which works with a JDK Http Server (cf. documentation).

What you need instead is the jersey-container-servlet module (cf. documentation), which works in every Servlet 3.x environment. Therefore you need to add this dependency:

I assume you are iterating over some database where in each iteration you are getting the nested list you have mentioned above.

Here you have, for the person 'Val Guene', total 9 jobs and 3 'University' so, for having both single 'experience' and single 'University' in a row, it wouldn't make sense.( as for like 'Senior Associate' which 'University' you will choose.) what you can do is use one of these to create a dataframe.

So let's use 'Experience'

let our this nested list be denoted by variable list1 then,

list1[0] :- 'name of person'

list1[1] :- 'tag/current job'

list1[2] :- 'Experience'

list1[3] :- 'University'

where,

From the execution plan the optimiser is, for some reason, re-evaluating the hierarchical query for every row in your table, and then using exists() to see if that row's ID is in the result. It isn't clear why the or is causing that. It might be something to raise with Oracle.

From experimenting I can see three ways to at least partially work around the problem - though I'm sure there are others. The first is to move the CSV expansion to a CTE and then force that to materialize with a hint: