master | configuration files for the official Red Eclipse master | Code Editor library

If anyone help me understand whether my-branch will be matched with the remote one or not

Probably. But it's impossible to be certain from the info you have given. To find out, say

Use COALESCE():

Not per documentation, but via testing, can confirm that when a new page loads, appInsights will not persist start/stoptrackevent.

Within the function you need to find each element in the passed array. However the type of the array is unknown. You only know the size of each element of the array and the starting address of the array that is passed through the parameter base0. of the type const void *..

To access an element of the array you need to use the pointer arithmetic. But the type void is incomplete type. Its size is unknown/ So you may not use the pointer of the type (const) void *` in expressions with the pointer arithmetic.

Thus this declaration

You could first build a list of paths, then in the second loop parse the files.

Updated formula:

=IF(VALUE(VLOOKUP($A2, Master!$A:$M, 13, 0)) > VALUE(VLOOKUP($A2, Master!$A:$M, 12, 0)), IF(ISBETWEEN(B$1, VALUE(VLOOKUP($A2, Master!$A:$M, 12, 0)), VALUE(VLOOKUP($A2, Master!$A:$M, 13, 0))), "Y", "N"), IF(OR(B$1 <= VALUE(VLOOKUP($A2, Master!$A:$M, 13, 0)), B$1 >= VALUE(VLOOKUP($A2, Master!$A:$M, 12, 0))), "Y", "N"))

Screenshot from the sheet you've shared with the formula working:

This version is an extension of the formula you shared. If someone is working from 4PM to 2AM then the way IFBETWEEN is being used will throw an error because 2AM is numerically less than 4PM and hence there is nothing in between.

So in cases where someone starts at a PM time and ends at AM time the formula checks for all slots between 12AM and the person working AM and marks them a Y. At the same time the formula also checks for all times in PM that are greater than the person working PM and marks them a Y as well.

If the person starts at a PM time and ends at a greater PM time then it uses your initial version of the formula.

I have made a slight modification to your formula and it should work now.

=IF($C9>$B9, IF(ISBETWEEN(B$1, VLOOKUP($A2, $A$8:$C, 2, 0), VLOOKUP($A2, $A$8:$C, 3, 0)), "Y", "N"), IF(OR(B$1 <= VLOOKUP($A2, $A$8:$C, 3, 0), B$1 >= VLOOKUP($A2, $A$8:$C, 2, 0)), "Y", "N"))

Please remember to remove the dates from some of the cells ex in your sheet the value in C2 is 12/31/1899 2:00:00 and it should be changed to just 2:00:00.

Ok, this should work. Remove the last line - run: git push from your action. Then add the following.

The Kubernetes project is making an effort to move away from wording that can be considered offensive, with one concrete recommendation being renaming master to control-plane. In other words control-plane and master mean essentially the same thing, and the goal is to switch the terminology to use control-plane exclusively going forward. (More info in this answer)

The kubectl command is a command line interface that executes on a client (i.e your computer) and interacts with the cluster through the control-plane. The IP address you are seing through cluster-info is the IP address through which you reach the control-plane

Use inheritance very carefully. Prefer association over inheritance whenever your inheritance is not a permanent truth from the birth to the death of an object. ANd keep in mind that dependencies between classes do not make any promises about objects of those classes.

Some clarifications on the UML syntax:

• I understand that your plain thick lines ended with a small hollow triangle represent a specialization/generalization relationship (aka inheritance). If this is correct, the triangle should be larger to avoid visual confusion. Moreover multiplicity makes no sense with inheritance and should be removed.
• I understand that with the dotted line you intend to represent an association with multiplicity. If this is correct:
  • the association should be plain lines, because dotted lines are for dependencies, and multiplicity would make no sense.
  • the meaning you give to the arrow head would be unclear. Do you use them to document navigability? In case of doubt, remove them. If you want to document ownership of the association end, use the dot notation instead. (we cannot say if it’s right or wrong, since it’s a decision on how your model sees the associations)

In view of your comments and the third model linked therein, there are some key UML semantics you need to keep in mind:

• Inheritance is an ultra-strong relationship which means "is (always) a". In your example, you may say that an Actor is always a Person, and hence, everything you say about a Person is also true for an Actor. By the way, you should avoid repeating inherited properties or methods, since it could create some ambiguity.
• Inheritance is not a substitute for aggregation, composition or association. You can for example not say that a CrewMember (one person) is always a Crew (a group of persons). A CrewMember belongs to a Crew but there are things that the crew can do together that the individual member can't.
• Inheritance is not suitable if it's not always true. A Character for example may often be a Person. But not always;: you can have ghost characters, comic characters, robot characters, or animals.
• Association means that there is some structural relation between some instances of the associated classes. For example, that one ore several persons live in one city, seems a very relevant assocaition.
• Dependency means that a class is dependent on another, i.e. without the other class it would not work or something would be missing. It's a statement about the classes and not the objects. I.e. If you meant to say that Person is dependent on City you just say that the class Person would not work without knowing about City (for example, because the operation sendPostCardFrom(city: City) needs an argument of that type) but you do not say anything about persons X, Y and Z. If you want that X, Y and Z are related to city a, b, and c, you need an association.

About the model content, I'll not decide for you and there is no single truth. I therefore prefer to draw your attention at potential issues. I raise them in form of a question, up-to you to adjust the model based on your own answer:

• Common issues between the both variants:

  • Are Actor and Director really Persons ? In this case, what with the Persons that are Actors and Directors at the same time (g.g. Clint Eastwood) ? Or are Actor and Director just roles that a Persons takes for a given Movie ?
  • Is a Character really related only to 1 Movie? What to do with Indiana Jones, where the same character appears in several movies?
  • In a similar way, I wonder if there's really a single Person who lives in a City or if this should not be a many-to-many association?

• Issues regarding the differences: `

  • Is a Person in version 1 a Character (inheritance) ? Or is a Character a representation of a Person (association: represents) ?
  • Is a Character in version 2 really an Actor and by transitivity also a Person (inheritance)? Or is the Character only associated with an Actor (association: plays) ?

It's up to you to decide, but wherever I asked a question about association or inheritance, you should better think twice before using inheritance (i.e. prefer association/composition over inheritance)