swift-driver | Swift compiler driver reimplementation in Swift | Web Framework library
kandi X-RAY | swift-driver Summary
kandi X-RAY | swift-driver Summary
Swift compiler driver reimplementation in Swift
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of swift-driver
swift-driver Key Features
swift-driver Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on swift-driver
QUESTION
I am learning RxSwift at the moment.
When would you use .drive(something)
and when .bind(to: something)
?
Example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-20 at 10:41From GitHub page of RxSwift
This is the most elaborate trait. Its intention is to provide an intuitive way to write reactive code in the UI layer, or for any case where you want to model a stream of data Driving your application.
- Can't error out.
- Observe occurs on main scheduler.
- Shares side effects (share(replay: 1, scope: .whileConnected)).
Again copying from same page
Its intended use case was to model sequences that drive your application.
Now coming back to differences?
Driver ensures that observe occurs only on main thread:
Drive is one of the traits in RxSwift that ensures observe occurs only on MainThread
, Which means no matter on what thread event is emitted and triggered driver, driver will always ensures to forward the event to next operator in the chain or to its subscribe block on main thread.
In Rx all events are propagated on the same thread in which the event occurred. So if you trigger a subject on say thread (100) using subject.onNext(
, its subscribe block will be called on the same thread (100) until and unless you use observedOn
or subscribedOn
operator to ensure the manual thread switching.
If you are driving your UI components from the observables/subjects in your viewModel, drivers make perfect sense. Assume you make API call to fetch data from server on background thread, you wouldn't wanna access your UI components on background thread, connecting/converting your observables/subjects to driver (using asDriver
and passing onErrorJustReturn
) and driving your UI components via driver will ensure your UI components are always accessed on main thread
Can't error out.
Normally when error occurs, subscription will be terminated and if you are driving your UI components you wouldn't want you subscription/bind to break every time there is an error event.
Example: Assume you drive your tableView via CoreData, and for some reason while fetching the data from CoreData an error occurred, if you don't use drive and had used plane bind(to:
its onError
will be triggered and its bind with UIComponent will be broken. If you fetch the data again you will have to re-establish this bind. For UI component error in fetching / procuring the data shouldn't make any difference. It should be simply a stream of events which changes its state.
bindTo
is nothing more than syntactic sugar coat on subscribe
so if you use bindTo
or subscribe
to drive UI components you will loose all the benefits drive
inherently brings to table.
You can always use observedOn
to ensure manual switching of thread to main
and also might have some retry mechanism to establish subscription back / retain subscription when an error occurs but ultimately you will end up writing your own drive trait
When should I use drive and when should I use bindTo
Thumb rule is are you trying to drive a UI component use drive
else use bindTo
. Generally if you want your subscribe to occur only on main thread and don't want your subscription to error out (like driving UI components) use driver
else stick with bindTo
or subscribe
EDIT 1:
OP's question in comment:
asDriver() in my example makes sure isEnabled is being observed on the main thread and I don’t have to pass onErrorJustReturn because BehaviorRelay also can’t fail? In this case drive() has the main thread benefit but not the failsafe benefit?
in my example makes sure isEnabled is being observed on the main thread - YES
I don’t have to pass onErrorJustReturn because BehaviorRelay also can’t fail? - BINGO
If you check a bit deeper on BehaviorRelay you will find
/// BehaviorRelay is a wrapper for
BehaviorSubject
. /// /// UnlikeBehaviorSubject
it can't terminate with error or completed.
So clearly BehaviorRelay cant error out hence compiler is intelligent enough to understand and not to ask for onErrorJustReturn
. If you really wanna see one use BehaviorSubject
and compiler will ask for it :)
Credits to Daniel to point out my mistake, that drive isn't the only trait that ensures observe occurs only on MainThread
hence edited my answer to reflect the same. Thank you
QUESTION
I am trying to install the Mongo Swift library using cocoapods but am fronting some problems.
As the documentation pointed out, for the mongo swift pod to work, it needs the mongo-c-driver. Which I installed using homebrew and is sitting in the Cellar folder in my usr folder(Meaning it is installed). I then modified the podfile the same as the example and when running pod install
the library is correctly installed.
The problem then comes when i open the project and try to build it. I have now these two errors:
'mongoc.h' file not found
Could not build Objective-C module 'libmongoc'
I made sure that I open the xcworkspace and not the default workspace. I also tried to add the path to the mongoc.h file to the Runpath Search Path in hope of some results but without luck.
As you may see i do not understand a lot of this and it basically could be something silly. But I do not know how to get this library to work.
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jul-16 at 10:26So i managed to get it to work.
I don't know why this happened but the header and library search paths were set wrongfully. I had installed version 1.10 of the mongo-c-driver and the search version in xCode was set to 1.94.
I also was trying to modify the search paths in my own project rather in the cocoa project which led to absolutely no results.
TLDR; Add the correct include and lib folder to the Header/Library Search Path in Xcode and make sure you set it in the Pods Project.
QUESTION
I am trying to install the MongoDB swift driver using the swift package driver. I followed their instructions and installed the mongo-c-driver using home-brew. I then created a new directory and within a new project using:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jul-13 at 14:00The Swift Evolution proposal that introduced the ability to specify branches instead of revisions in SPM packages (SE-0150 says this:
While this feature [specifying branches] is useful during development, a package's dependencies should be updated to point at versions instead of branches before that package is tagged for release. This is because a released package should provide a stable specification of its dependencies, and not break when a branch changes over time. To enforce this, it is an error if a package referenced by a version-based dependency specifies a branch in any of its dependencies.
It looks like the version 0.0.2 of the parent package that you're using did not follow the rule to switch to specific versions for its dependencies and SPM doesn't allow this.
If possible, you should try to use a newer version of the parent package that fixes this issue. If a newer version doesn't exist, you may have to override the dependency and fix it yourself (I believe you can use swift package edit
to do that — or fork the dependency and point to your own repo, of course.)
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install swift-driver
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page