Signed | GPL licensed editor and renderer | 3D Animation library
kandi X-RAY | Signed Summary
kandi X-RAY | Signed Summary
Signed will be an GPL licensed editor and renderer for procedural Signed Distance Functions (SDFs). Signed will be available for macOS and iOS and is heavily optimized for Metal.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Signed
Signed Key Features
Signed Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Signed
QUESTION
I have bunch of GRPC microservices and they are using self signed certs. I add authentication info to the GRPC channel which is then used to identify endpoints and provide right services.
Now I want migrate to Istio mTLS.
In phase one, I got Istio to BYPASS all GRPC connections and my services works as it is now.
In Phase two, I want to hand off TLS to Istio, but I am stuck on how to pass the authentication information to GRPC?
How do you handle auth in Istio mTLS setup?
GRPC can support other authentication mechanisms Has anyone used this to inject Istio auth info to GRPC? any other suggestions on how you implemented this in your setup
I am using go-lang just in case if this can be useful to provide any additional information.
Thanks
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 09:21One way of doing this is using grpc.WithInsecure(), this way you don't have to add certificates to your services, since istio-proxy containers in your pods will TLS terminate any incoming connections.
Client side:
QUESTION
I have users in a Cognito user pool, some of whom are in an Administrators group. These administrators need to be allowed to read/write to a specific S3 bucket, and other users must not.
To achieve this, I assigned a role to the Administrators group which looked like this:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 12:03The solution lies in the federated identity pool's settings.
By default the identity pool will provide the IAM role that it's configured with. In other words, one of either the "unauthenticated role" or the "authenticated role" that it's set up with.
But it can be told instead to provide a role specified by the authentication provider. That's what will solve the problem here.
- In the AWS console, in Cognito, open the relevant identity pool.
- Click "Edit identity pool" (top right)
- Expand "Authentication Providers"
- Under Authenticated Role Selection, choose "Choose role from token".
That will allow Cognito to specify its own roles, and you will find that the users get the privileges of their group.
QUESTION
We are programmatically creating PDF using our in house lib (C++) by adding all the required objects so that PDF readers can render them properly. Currently we are enhancing the lib to support digital signatures in PDF. Our users will use USB token or Windows certificates to sign the PDF. On studying raw PDF file with digital signature, we were able to make sense of all the objects except for the contents of Sig type object.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-10 at 16:48Ok, the signature container is embedded correctly.
But there are issues with the signature container itself:
Both in the
SignedData.digestAlgorithmscollection and in theSignerInfo.digestAlgorithmvalue you have used the OID of SHA1withRSA, but that is a full signature algorithm, not the mere digest algorithm SHA1 expected there.Then the SHA1 hash of the signed bytes is BB78A402F7A537A34D6892B83881266501A691A8 but the hash you signed is 90E28B8A0D8E48691DAFE2BA10A4761FFFDCCD3D. This might be because you hash buffer2 and
buffer2 has empty contents data (/Contents <>)
The hex string delimiters '<' and '>' also belong to the contents value and, therefore, must also be removed in buffer2.
Furthermore, your signature is very weak:
- It uses SHA1 as hash algorithm. SHA1 meanwhile has been recognized as too weak a hash algorithm for document signatures.
- It doesn't use signed attributes, neither the ESS signing certificate nor the algorithm identifier protection attribute. Many validation policies require such special attributes.
QUESTION
I am trying to implement a method to check a users login status based on firebase's firebase.auth().onAuthStateChanged(). I would like to use this across my app as a global variable.
At the moment, I am using a Vue.observable store to set the value of my signed in state.
store.js
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 20:07Make a computed property called isSignedIn then watch it using watch option :
QUESTION
I am making a little web based tic tac toe game as a project to show on my portfolio website. I want someone visiting the site to be able to create a game, and then another player to join that game.
The person that creates the game creates a document in my firestore database under a "Games" collection, that is defined by this interface:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 14:58It sounds like you're looking for this:
QUESTION
Attempting to use cyrilgdn/postgresql provider but terraform continues to attempt to load hashicorp/postgresql, this causes init to fail. Currently using terraform 1.0.0, although the problems happens on 14.1 too - have not upgraded from 12.x, always run 14.1 or newer on this work.
I've reduced the code to the below, nothing else in this folder and still get the problem
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 11:05It should be postgresql, not postgres:
QUESTION
I have an OpenID Connect server (OpenIDdict) and an asp.net core webapp in containers behind a TLS termination proxy. In production, all communication between the webapp and the OIDC server can go through the 'outside', based on their public names. However, in development, I'm using self signed certificates that aren't trusted by the containers running the apps, only by my host pc. Because of that, in development, the webapp can redirect the browser to the OIDC server just fine, but when it, for instance, needs to call the token endpoint, it will fail, because the certificate isn't trusted.
A possible solution would be to have the server to server communication go through the internal container network, but I haven't been able to get that to work. Is there a way to make the asp.net core OpenID Connect middleware use a different url (and protocol) for server to server communication?
Another solution would be to install the self signed certificates in the containers, but because that's only needed in development, it seems bad practice to burden the images with that. Is that assessment correct?
I'm hoping I'm missing the most obvious solution. Any ideas?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 12:33This is what I ended up doing:
- I added a custom domain to the hosts file of my pc, pointing to itself.
- Using openssl, I created a rootDevCA.crt and added it to the trusted root on my pc and in all the container images.
- With that root certificate, I signed a new certificate for the custom domain and supplied that (including its key) to the proxy.
As long as I keep the key file for the root certificate far away from my source code, there should be no security issues.
QUESTION
I am implementing facebook data deletion callback but I got really lost and i can't continue on the JSON response that facebook is expecting.
- Return a JSON response that contains a URL where the user can check the status of their deletion request and an alphanumeric confirmation code. The JSON response has the following form:
{ url: '', confirmation_code: '' }
that is the part that I got lost and stuck. My question is
- what is the URL should do or show.
- what is the logic between the confirmation code
so far here is what I did on my controller.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-01 at 10:05
- what is the URL should do or show.
The purpose of this URL, is what the documentation said - to provide a way for the user, to check on the status of their deletion request.
Not all apps will be able to delete all personal user data immediately, the moment the user requests it.
Some might need to keep a subset of the data for legal reasons; others might simply need some extra processing time, because the process can not be handled in a totally automated matter, and a human needs to get involved.
So the user is given this status check URL in response to their request – so that they can go visit that URL tomorrow, or two weeks or six months from now, and check on the status of their deletion request - were you able to delete all data by now, will it still take some time, is there some data that won’t be deleted for legal reasons, etc.
- what is the logic between the confirmation code
Just a different way to access the same information. Maybe checking the status via the URL you provided is not enough for the user, so they might want to call or send an email to your support staff, to inquire about the status of their deletion request. Then they can give your support people that code, and they can go look up the necessary information via that.
If you check the code examples in the documentation, they are using the same code value in the status check URL, and as the confirmation code. So you can use the same code for both.
Create it, store it in your database, and associate the status of a particular user’s deletion request with that code.
QUESTION
My python (Django) application stores confidential documents and has a private bucket in AWS S3.
When you make a request for the resource, it uses boto3 to generate a pre-signed URL to be able to download the document.
The code to do so is as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 00:04Your code on your EB instance uses instance role to provide it with AWS credentials. When you do this, x-amz-security-token is used which is a regular part of AWS credentails when you use IAM roles.
In contrast, when you run it locally, you use IAM user for AWS credentials. In that case, token is not used.
QUESTION
I know the standard says if the integer literal does not fit the int, it tries unsigned int, and so forth, per section 2.14.2 Table 6 in the standard.
My question is: what's the criteria to determine it fits or not?
Why do both std::is_signed::value std::is_signed::value gives false. Why don't they fit in int? 0x80000000 has the same bit representation as signed -1 signed -2147483648.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 18:19You don't need to look at "bit representation" to check if the number fits or not.
Assuming sizeof(int) == 4, int can represent numbers from -231 to 231-1 inclusive.
0x80000000 is 231, which is 1 larger than the maximum value.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Signed
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
