useDApp | Framework for rapid Dapp development | Cryptocurrency library

 by   EthWorks TypeScript Version: @usedapp/coingecko@0.4.3 License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | useDApp Summary

kandi X-RAY | useDApp Summary

useDApp is a TypeScript library typically used in Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Ethereum, React applications. useDApp has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

Framework for rapid Dapp development. Simple. Robust. Extendable. Testable
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              useDApp has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 854 star(s) with 198 fork(s). There are 16 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 76 open issues and 108 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 54 days. There are 8 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of useDApp is @usedapp/coingecko@0.4.3

            kandi-Quality Quality

              useDApp has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              useDApp has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              useDApp is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              useDApp releases are available to install and integrate.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of useDApp
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            useDApp Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for useDApp.

            useDApp Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for useDApp.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Error: supportedChain is deprecated, please pass networks instead
            Asked 2022-Apr-03 at 10:10

            I'm going through the freecodecamp Patrick Collins tutorial on creating front ends for Ethereum smart contracts and I don't know why when I open up the localhost console I get an error.

            supportedChain is deprecated, please pass networks instead

            I have already installed metamask/detect provider

            npm i @metamask/detect-provider

            Here's the app.tsx script here:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Apr-03 at 10:10

            Error is so clear. instead of supportedChains use networks

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71724543

            QUESTION

            useDapp and hardhat returning different values from smart contract
            Asked 2022-Mar-12 at 01:33

            I have a local testnet node using Hardhat. I can successfully deploy and test against my contract using plain javascript, async await and const { ethers, upgrades } = require("hardhat");.

            I am correctly returning, and printing to the console, a BigNumber array with 2 elements from a contract function.

            But the useDapp function call returns a different value.

            I have tried everything: JSON.stringify(array) returns [[]], array[0] returns undefined, BigNumber.from(array).toNumber throws some crazy BigNumber error, etc. But I know the contract is giving it the correct values.

            Why am I getting 2 different values in 2 different javascript files? I'm assuming it's an issue with the way the hardhat test file is retrieving the values vs. useDapp.

            My useDapp front end hook looks like this which returns [Array(0)] with length: 1:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-12 at 01:33

            For anyone super confused on this, which I'm sure will be common in the future with EVM smart contract developers, the hardhat default network testing vs testing against a mainnet fork will return different number types from the contract.

            For example, using regular .js test files with the default network, returning a uint256[] from the contract will be regular integer looking numbers.

            But for the mainnet fork, returning a uint256[] will return a BigNumber array, which javascript has trouble breaking down. You will need a BigNumber package to work with it. It seems the mainnet fork .js interactions require getting the first element of the array Array[0], and inside of that element will be each BigNumber object, which further needs decoded with something like BigNumber.from(yourNumber).toNumber().

            Note: as for sending numbers in to the contract, you need to make sure you pay attention to the decimals of a token when dealing with any token values. For example, if a token has 6 decimal places programmed in the contract, and you want to send a value into the contract representing 600 coins, you need to send either 600000000 (600 with 6 0's added) or BigNumber.from(600000000). I am not sure if converting it to a BigNumber type before sending it into the contract saves gas or something, because the conversion is off chain, but it seems you can send either number in to the contract. You just have to make sure you add the 0's to the end of the number according to the token you are working with.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71411979

            QUESTION

            Failed to parse source map... Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory
            Asked 2022-Feb-08 at 19:32

            The problem is when I run yarn start there are some warnings occur as:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-08 at 19:25

            The issue was solved with the recent update 0.11 of @usedapp/core library.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70986875

            QUESTION

            Weird error using Smart Contracts with @usedapp and @ethersproject/contracts
            Asked 2021-Nov-12 at 20:49

            Hello there I'm trying to use a contract made on solidity and deployed with brownie on my front end using React and typescript. also using the framework usedapp, as the documentation here says in order to interact with a contract function I should create a new contract, providing the address and the ABI. Here is my code:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Nov-10 at 00:33

            Solution:

            Replace this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69900547

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install useDApp

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries

            Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link