type-assertions | Assertions to test your TypeScript types | Assertion library
kandi X-RAY | type-assertions Summary
kandi X-RAY | type-assertions Summary
Assertions to test your TypeScript types.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of type-assertions
type-assertions Key Features
type-assertions Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on type-assertions
QUESTION
I have a vue project with an ESLint and prettier config like so:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 08:26ESLint uses @typescript-eslint/no-extra-parens
and doesn't need no-extra-parens
, @typescript-eslint/*
are supposed to aggregate *
rules with same names, with the addition of features specific to TypeScript.
It's Prettier that affects this code, changing ESLint rules without disabling Prettier won't change the way it works.
The use of parentheses in this piece of code is redundant, as any as ...
is a common construct in TypeScript and can be read and processed without parentheses:
QUESTION
I have some code using destructuring assignment as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-19 at 12:34You can use the following syntax to approach this:
QUESTION
In TypeScript, How can I declare a function f that follows the rules above?
f is a function that:
- takes another function callback as a parameter; and
- returns a different function hook;
- where hook accepts the same parameters as callback but has a different return type.
Emphasis on "different return type"...
My specific goal is to type a React Hook I implemented, but my question is not related to the hook itself. Rather, it's with the type declaration.
I am very close to the solution, but there is still a missing piece... Based on this answer from a different but similar question, I was able to add a type hint to the function correctly covering the parameters, but this approach lies about the return type:
Here is my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-07 at 21:50I guess the solution would look something like this (I have written it as what I believe is a minimal reproducible example for your problem).
In the case below you can see that the aToC function was constructed from the aToB function, it ends up with the same parameter signature but a different return value. There is a typescript playground for it which shows it compiles where you can hover over aToC to check the type and experiment from there.
QUESTION
Some functions like numpy.intersect1d return differents types (in this case an ndarray or a tuple of three ndarrays) but the compiler can only infer one of them, so if I like to make:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-10 at 19:55According to the MyPy documentation, there are two ways to do type assertions:
- As an inline expression, you can use the
cast
function. The docs say this is "usually" done to cast from a supertype to a subtype, but doesn't say you can't use it in other cases. - As a statement, you can use
assert isinstance(..., ...)
, but this will only work with concrete types likeint
orlist
which are represented at runtime, not more complex types likeList[int]
which can't be checked byisinstance
.
Since the documentation doesn't mention any other ways to do type assertions, it seems like these are the only ways.
QUESTION
I have a Vuex store:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-11 at 17:48What it is asking for is that you use the as
type assertion to specify the type of []
.
One reason to use as
is that as
works in TSX files (thus the "consistent" in the name of the rule).
QUESTION
We're using the library msal
and are trying to convert our javaScript code to TypeScript.
The following picture indicates that TS correctly knows the type expected for cacheLocation
. This can be either the string localStorage
, the string sessionStorage
or undefined
. However, when trying to wire this together with a variable that holds one of the expected values it fails:
The issue would be fixed by using the following syntax. The only problem in this case is that a wrong value is not flagged as incorrect:
When reading the TS docs on Type Assertions it says that this is by design and the developer knows that the type will be correct. I did however expect TS to throw an error if an unknown value would've been used.
Is there a better way for doing this? Or is this simply how it's done? Sorry if this is a stupid question, I'm still learning TS.
Code
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-12 at 13:03QUESTION
I have these types in my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-24 at 16:55The main problem you have currently is that the type of FormErrors
says that it has a key matching every key of V, and until the reduce finishes, that's not true.
You have a couple of options:
Pass generics to reduce to make the return type
Partial>
, and cast to FormErrors at the end:
QUESTION
I want to allow data!.id
Error:
warning Forbidden non-null assertion @typescript-eslint/no-non-null-assertion
Current config:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-20 at 13:54Please add '@typescript-eslint/no-non-null-assertion': 'off'
to your config file like below.
QUESTION
Since tslint will be deprecated soon, I'm trying to convert tslint rules to eslint.
These are all my rules for tslint.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-16 at 04:47Here's what's happening:
- typescript-eslint uses your
tsconfig.json
file to read in a collection of source files - ESLint rules use the TypeScript features provided by typescript-eslint
- Those ESLint rules are being run on a file that's not included in your
tsconfig.json
This causes a crash because TypeScript information is being requested about a file that TypeScript doesn't know about.
Make sure your ESLint file is set to only run on files included in your tsconfig.json
, and this error should go away.
QUESTION
I'm converting ASP.NET WebForms' Focus.js
(it's embedded in System.Web.dll
) into TypeScript (because I'm maintaining a WebForms project that makes heavy-use of ASP.NET WebForms' stock client-side scripts).
Here's the original JavaScript function WebForm_IsInVisibleContainer
from Focus.js
:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Dec-01 at 01:31If current
, if it may have a property disabled
, will be one of HTMLInputElement | HTMLSelectElement | HTMLTextAreaElement
, then I think the best thing to do would be to create a type guard for that:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install type-assertions
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page