ts-expect | Checks TypeScript types match expected values | Testing library
kandi X-RAY | ts-expect Summary
kandi X-RAY | ts-expect Summary
Checks values in TypeScript match expectations.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ts-expect
ts-expect Key Features
ts-expect Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ts-expect
QUESTION
Let's say I have a custom MyArray
class that extends upon the builtin Array
class, how should I type so that myMap(myArr: MyArray, )
can correctly infer the return type as MyArray
, instead of the builtin Array
?
PS: I want this type declaration to be as general as possible, which is why I didn't simply overload the map
method. That way, I can easily change the signature for type variable Arr
in myArr
to Iterable
, and this can also be used on other builtin/custom classes like Set
that implements the Iterable Protocol. Right now the best I could do is to have the user specify their desired return type as a generic function variable.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-03 at 19:57I believe you dont have to specify any static
properties, because then you have to implement them all.
Since you want to override some of Array.prototype
methods, I think it is better to type only those methods which you are interested in.
QUESTION
I have a function that takes a second argument which is only required when the first argument is a string matching a template literal string. However, it appears that even when TypeScript knows that the first argument is such a string, it still matches the overload that takes a regular string:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 11:41I believe you dont need to overload your function.
Consider next example:
QUESTION
I can't seem to figure out how to write a return type for this function, which works as expected, and typechecks as expected too (sans the internal todos). The fact that partially the type is on the inner closure is throwing me off.
Here's the core code, full code here:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 19:12The tricky thing here is that your function is generic at declaration time (when useImmer
is called), and at call time (when the callback is called). You can model this with a type like:
QUESTION
The code is basically for a thumbnail-uploader accepting only SVGs. The problem is at new FileReader() and new Image().Can't understand the error Expected a spy but got a function
upon it's execution. Function that I'm trying to test.The function is for a NgbModal that shows up for the preview purpose of uploading a thumbnail.The uploaded thumbnail first loads on the modal then at the component
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-14 at 12:49The problem is that component.confirm
in the following statement is not a Spy
but a function.
QUESTION
So I have a union of tuples, and I can use it to declare locals:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-10 at 20:02The problem with
QUESTION
Before this is marked as a duplicate, it is not, at least not of any of the first 10+ search results. This situation adds a level of complexity that I can't quite figure out.
tl;dr What works for exclusively specifying exactly one property of n must exist, or that a property must exist in exactly one of n spots, does not work when used on a nested property. TS Playground
I'm doing some Saturday overengineering--like ya do. My project uses JSON HAL documents (HAL documents basically describe an entity of some sort and with a _links
property, define the available behavior), however, the backend (which I did not write) does not always send the documents in the same shape. I have a normalizeRepresentation()
function that takes in what the server sends me and morphs it into what it should look like.
To produce minimal code, I've removed stuff regarding _links
.
Differences between standard HAL:
- the entity data is on exactly one of:
- the root document itself
- the
document
property - the
data
property - the
item
property - the
item.data
property
- there is an optional
contentType
property that is either placed on the root document or inside the entity data, but not both
normalizeRepresentation()
initially had the signature:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-04 at 01:16I think I've done it, by basically expanding all of the helper types out into one big union. This helped me see what was supposed to be happening, and also made it work better in the end. I found it important to add x?: never
in many places, so that TS can properly prevent you from mixing together different variants of the data structure.
The errors don't always occur on the same lines as your original code, but I'm not sure much can be done about that.
I think this also still has some limitations, for example, it probably won't work if T
legitimately has a data
or contentType
key.
At some level of complexity, though, I would question the value of having these very strict TS types, which work best with object literals (where the compiler actually gives an error if you add unknown keys), when you said the data is coming from a server anyway, which implies that mostly only your test code will ever be working with object literals. If you're able to leverage these types on the server where the objects are being generated, though, that could be beneficial.
QUESTION
In a static method in a base class, is it possible to name the currently class's instance type?
Put another way, can you make this code type check:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-16 at 18:53By making the static method generic and constrained by the this
param of the static method you can make the type of the class that you call the static method on available. From there, just use the InstanceType
operator, like so:
QUESTION
I have a generic function to update state (use-case is dynamically handling updates to tables in React), and have used generics to ensure calling the function is type-safe, but I don't understand why TypeScript won't compile.
In the function itself it seems like Typescript isn't using all the available information to narrow down the type, and instead thinks I'm still working with the full union. It clearly knows enough about the arguments to tell whether the function is being called correctly, so why does it fail when type-checking the actual implementation?
Fails at row[field] = value
.
Minimal example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-11 at 06:04Try this:
QUESTION
Is it possible to make //ts-expect-error
directive only cover a concrete error and not others?
Example of code I would like to silent but only for some kind of error:
I would expect something like ESLint does with rules: //@ts-expect-error TS2339
to only silent errors of that kind, for example.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-07 at 22:34It's not currently possible - this has been a long standing request; one of the underlying issues is that the error codes are moving targets, as they're not meant to be used for explicit referencing.
QUESTION
Using Typescript 4.1.2 is it possible to compile code that references the functions one calls when the --allow-natives-syntax
flag in v8 is set?
For example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-07 at 21:54I don't have boilerplate to test v8 natives, so I don't know if it works, but You can try next piece of code
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ts-expect
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page