use-http | 🐶 React hook for making isomorphic http requests | Frontend Framework library

 by   ava TypeScript Version: 1.0.8 License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | use-http Summary

kandi X-RAY | use-http Summary

use-http is a TypeScript library typically used in User Interface, Frontend Framework, React applications. use-http has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

If the last argument of useFetch is not a dependency array [], then it will not fire until you call one of the http methods like get, post, etc. This fetch is run onMount/componentDidMount. The last argument [] means it will run onMount. If you pass it a variable like [someVariable], it will run onMount and again whenever someVariable changes values (aka onUpdate). If no method is specified, GET is the default. Can put suspense in 2 places. Either useFetch (A) or Provider (B). Can put suspense in 2 places. Either useFetch (A) or Provider (B). Suspense mode via managed state is very experimental. The onNewData will take the current data, and the newly fetched data, and allow you to merge the two however you choose. In the example below, we are appending the new todos to the end of the current todos. ️ Do not destructure the response object! Details in this video. Technically you can do it, but if you need to access the response.ok from, for example, within a component's onClick handler, it will be a stale value for ok where it will be correct for response.ok. ️️️. The Provider allows us to set a default url, options (such as headers) and so on. These props are defaults used in every request inside the . They can be overwritten individually. This example shows how we can do authentication in the request interceptor and how we can camelCase the results in the response interceptor. This example shows how we can upload a file using useFetch. This example shows how we can get .json(), .text(), .formData(), .blob(), .arrayBuffer(), and all the other http response methods. By default, useFetch 1st tries to call response.json() under the hood, if that fails it's backup is response.text(). If that fails, then you need a different response type which is where this comes in. This example shows how to remove a header all together. Let's say you have , but for one api call, you don't want that header in your useFetch at all for one instance in your app. This would allow you to remove that. In this example you can see how retryOn will retry on a status code of 305, or if we choose the retryOn() function, it returns a boolean to decide if we will retry. With retryDelay we can either have a fixed delay, or a dynamic one by using retryDelay(). Make sure retries is set to at minimum 1 otherwise it won't retry the request. If retries > 0 without retryOn then by default we always retry if there's an error or if !response.ok. If retryOn: [400] and retries > 0 then we only retry on a response status of 400.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              use-http has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 2283 star(s) with 115 fork(s). There are 17 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 65 open issues and 121 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 65 days. There are 20 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of use-http is 1.0.8

            kandi-Quality Quality

              use-http has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              use-http has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              use-http is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              use-http releases are available to install and integrate.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of use-http
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            use-http Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for use-http.

            use-http Examples and Code Snippets

            Use HTTP client with given authenticator .
            javadot img1Lines of Code : 19dot img1License : Permissive (MIT License)
            copy iconCopy
            private static void useClientWithAuthenticator() throws URISyntaxException, IOException, InterruptedException {
                    HttpClient client = HttpClient.newBuilder()
                        .authenticator(new Authenticator() {
                            @Override
                         
            Use HTTP client with headers .
            javadot img2Lines of Code : 14dot img2License : Permissive (MIT License)
            copy iconCopy
            private static void useClientWithHeaders() throws IOException, InterruptedException, URISyntaxException {
                    HttpClient client = HttpClient.newBuilder()
                        .build();
            
                    HttpRequest request = HttpRequest.newBuilder()
                        .G  
            Use HTTP core .
            javadot img3Lines of Code : 3dot img3License : Permissive (MIT License)
            copy iconCopy
            private static void useHttpCore() {
                    SSLContextBuilder.create();
                }  

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            How can I use RateLimiter's HttpClient DelegatingHandler with dependency injection?
            Asked 2021-May-22 at 02:56

            I've been using RateLimiter (github) successfully with my project for a while now. I've recently discovered dependency injection and am attempting to migrate my code as-is to use this but I'm stuck on RateLimiter.

            Normal usage from the docs is

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-22 at 02:56

            I don't know if this is a bug or a feature, but to fix this I believe you need to add the delegating handler as Transient as well.

            So, in a typical scenario, you'd set up a DelegatingHandler as so:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67577658

            QUESTION

            My Reactjs program keeps executing the useEffect hook continuously, whilst I want it to execute only once
            Asked 2021-May-17 at 12:55

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-17 at 12:55

            But, if I add it as a dependency (for good practice purposes), the hook runs continuously and I get recurring console.log statements. Could someone please explain why this is happening?

            Because sendRequest is a function which is re created each time the component is re-rendered, hence, it is different on each render. Because of that, when it is listed as a dependency, useEffect re-runs. Consider using useCallback and wrapping sendRequest using it.

            Consider re-rendering of a component same as the function being re-invoked, hence you are creating all the variables or functions inside it from scratch (except cases when React takes care to retain value of your variable across re-renders; this happens with variables from state for example).

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67559763

            QUESTION

            ServiceBusClient for Azure Service Bus - reuse tcp connections like with HttpClientFactory
            Asked 2021-May-16 at 08:28

            I have many CRUD APIs that are communication with each other over HTTP calls (.NET 5)
            To avoid too many open tcp connections, I use HttpClientFactory via DI in all those services. This works well and I do not experience too many connections that are opened via HTTP.

            But my Azure App Services are still complaining about too many SNAT-connections:

            I guess that the reason is the Azure Service Bus. Each call of my APIs will write events to the bus.
            To do this I create a new instance on each call:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-15 at 12:48

            But what about Azure Service Bus? There is nothing like an AzureServiceBusFactory or so and adding the AzureServiceBus as a Singleton would not be a good idea, because the configuration should be different on each call.

            It is actually the other way round. Service Bus team recommends that connection to your Service Bus should be registered as Singleton only using ServiceBusClientBuilderExtensions and should not be closed or disposed after every operation.

            From this link:

            The Service Bus objects that interact with the service, such as ServiceBusClient, ServiceBusSender, ServiceBusReceiver, and ServiceBusProcessor, should be registered for dependency injection as singletons (or instantiated once and shared). ServiceBusClient can be registered for dependency injection with the ServiceBusClientBuilderExtensions.

            We recommend that you don't close or dispose these objects after sending or receiving each message. Closing or disposing the entity-specific objects (ServiceBusSender/Receiver/Processor) results in tearing down the link to the Service Bus service. Disposing the ServiceBusClient results in tearing down the connection to the Service Bus service.

            Please see this link for complete recommendations from Service Bus team: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/service-bus-messaging/service-bus-performance-improvements?tabs=net-standard-sdk-2.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67546770

            QUESTION

            Using HTTP/2 with nginx Ingress on GKE
            Asked 2021-May-15 at 18:11

            We have configured a cluster on GKE and installed nginx-ingress. Using our ingress rule it works, but I can't make it work with HTTP/2. We set the data information on the ConfigMap but it will always fallback to http/1.1. This exact setup was running fine on DigitalOcean. Can anyone provide some guidance?

            Thanks

            Install Nginx-Ingress

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-15 at 18:11
            EDIT

            After further reproduction I've noticed that in the question there is a miss-match between the NGINX Ingress controllers.

            There are 2 similarly named Ingress controllers:

            This are 2 separate products where the differences are explained here:

            Due to this Configmap key:

            • use-http2: "true"

            I've incorrectly assumed that we are talking about the nginx where in fact it was the nginx-inc (I've missed the link of $ helm repo add). This field is specific to the nginx and will not work with the nginx-inc.

            I've managed to find a way to enable the HTTP/2 support with the nginx-inc. Change:

            • from: use-http2: "true"
            • to: http2: "true"

            More explanation can be found here:

            Below part is more of a general approach to the support of HTTP/2 on GKE with Ingress.

            A side note!

            Even without the tls part in the YAML manifest it's possible to use HTTPS due to the Fake Ingress Controller certificate

            As pointed in the following github issue:

            aledbf commented on 28 Mar 2019

            NGINX does not support HTTP/1.x and HTTP/2 at the same time on a cleartext (non-TLS) port. That's the reason why it works only when HTTPS is used.

            -- Github.com: Kubernetes: Ingress nginx: Issue: HTTP2 support

            As stated to enable HTTP/2 you will need to have the tls part (certificate) configured in your Ingress resource.

            Here you can find the documentation to help you with the process:

            I've used your setup on the GKE version 1.20.5-gke.2000 (the Helm part) and here is what I found.

            Querying the external IP of your Ingress controller with HTTP request will allow you to use HTTP/1.1.

            After I've configured the certificate to use with the Ingress resource (and domain name), I could get the response stating that I'm using HTTP/2:

            You can check it with various measures like cURL or online HTTP/2 test sites:

            • curl -v -k https://DOMAIN.NAME

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67471377

            QUESTION

            How can I do Dependency Injection without "new'ing" a class instance and providing the parameters myself?
            Asked 2021-Apr-27 at 20:03

            I have a client that is created from an OpenApi definition that is generated using NSwagStudio. The code that is generated has an interface and a class. It takes an HttpClient in the constructor. I set this up for the DI engine like this.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-27 at 17:01

            Based on Jeremy's comment on my question, I created a new class that I derive from the generated one. It doesn't add any new functionality but it does add a constructor with strongly typed parameters. I still use the base class that handles the security part for me but now I use the DI engine in a way that is recommended by Microsoft.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67236829

            QUESTION

            How to bind HttpClient to a specific (source) ip address in .NET 5
            Asked 2021-Mar-17 at 22:00

            According to issue #1793 it shouldn't be necessary to use quirks like this to bind a HttpClient in .NET 5 to a specific local ip address.

            However, I'm totally overwhelmed by this topic meanwhile where .NET Core developers aren't capable since years to bring the option of chosing the outgoing ip address of a http request to .NET Core. Even the backwards compatible WebClient isn't capable of doing this in earlier .NET Core versions nor any other high level HTTP API is capable of doing this. God (or whoever) praise .NET 5, which should (hopefully?) bring such capabilities back to a modern .NET framework.

            How can I configure a HttpClient object to chose a specific local ip address for outgoing connections only using on-bord methods in .NET 5? Or is it still impossible? Bonus question: How can I configure a ClientWebSocket object to chose a specific local ip address for the outgoing connection only using on-bord methods in .NET 5?

            In my setup computers have multiple ip addresses and the services I'm accessing have quite strict rate limits based on source ip addresses.

            Please refrain from telling me, that the operating system will chose the right adapter or ip address to use. Please don't send me to a 3rd party library. Yes, even if they fixed WebClient in this regard I don't wanna use it.

            Other issues of interest:

            • #23267: HttpClient specify interface to bind to / make requests from
            • #28721: Add ConnectCallback on SocketsHttpHandler (aka custom Dialers)
            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Mar-17 at 22:00

            .NET Core and therefore also .NET 5 supports various HttpHandlers. The SocketsHttpHandler is used to configure a HttpClient to use the .NET internal socket implementation (not relying on WinHttp).

            Since .NET 5 you can use the ConnectCallback of the SocketsHttpHandler to configure how the connection should be established like this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65930192

            QUESTION

            How to implement IHttpFactoryClient in examples of Typed HttpClient?
            Asked 2020-Nov-11 at 01:17

            In every example I've seen, including the Microsoft ones here and here, the author's explain the improvements made by IHttpClientFactory over HttpClient and give examples of how to use it simply out-of-the-box or in Named form. But then they all seem to mention that utilizing the Typed form really is best for its structure, usability, and more. The reasons make sense for our use case.

            Though like the links provided above, there isn't a single line of code instantiating, injecting, or using IHttpClientFactory in the involvement of creating a Typed HttpClient (or Service as a Client). You create the Typed Client:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Nov-11 at 01:17

            The framework will use ITypedHttpClientFactory to create the HttpClient to be injected into the typed client. This is happening under the hood when the typed client is configured like so:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64761646

            QUESTION

            Right way to use http proxy and https proxy within meta while using http site and https sites individually?
            Asked 2020-Nov-10 at 22:42

            I've been trying for the last couple of hours to find out any specific guidance on how to use http and https proxies respectively within meta['proxy']. Let us consider the two urls http://app1.nu.edu.bd/ and https://www.yelp.com/ where I wish to use http proxy and https proxy individually as the protocol are different. For this very example we can think of using the two type of proxies 1. http proxy - 62.210.99.150:3838 and 2. https proxy - 173.212.202.65:80.

            Now, I'm trying like the following:

            While using http://app1.nu.edu.bd/:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Nov-10 at 22:04

            The right way of doing it, using the requests module, should look like this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64777239

            QUESTION

            IHttpClient implementation within Orleans.NET
            Asked 2020-Sep-30 at 23:36

            Usually, it's recommended to create a wrapper implementing IHttpClient or IHttpClientFactory. Meanwhile, some Orleans samples show that it's ok to create HttpClient instance on-demand and use it directly from the grain.

            Questions

            • Should I create Orleans service as a wrapper around IHttpClient or call HttpClient directly from the grain?
            • If I need a wrapper, would this implementation suffice?
            • What's the difference between GrainService and GrainServiceClient?
            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Sep-30 at 23:36

            You should follow standard best-practices when using HttpClient within Orleans. The sample is creating a new one for simplicity of exposition, not as an indicator of best practices. A PR to change the sample documentation to use IHttpClientFactory (for example) would likely be accepted.

            You do not need a GrainService to call into HTTP services from your grain: you can inject the required dependencies (IHttpClientFactory or your typed client) and call HTTP services directly from grain code.

            Regarding the question on the purpose of GrainService and GrainServiceClient, GrainService is a special service which is intended to be accessed from grain code. GrainServices are instantiated on every node in the cluster and each one is given responsibility over a set of grains. As an example, reminders (persistent timers) in Orleans are implemented using GrainServices. The LocalReminderService on each node takes responsibility for a set of grains and will wake those grains up when their reminders are due. GrainServiceClient is used by grains to access the GrainService instance which is responsible for the calling grain. The documentation explains more here: https://dotnet.github.io/orleans/Documentation/grains/grainservices.html

            I would avoid using GrainService unless you find a use case which it fits closely.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64146335

            QUESTION

            How IDM knows google drive file sizes?
            Asked 2020-Aug-15 at 01:30

            I am working on a download manager in C# integrated Chrome. When I try to download from google drive the response doesn't return a Content-Length and this means -1 (Unknown). But IDM gets the correct size and I couldn't understand how. Anyone knows please help!

            The file in this url: https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&confirm=-wOm&id=1gC_fEKIlv9oaLQUAKH4GvRvAIqhDgAbz

            Response headers:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Aug-15 at 01:30

            You have not posted your code to review your issue. However, you should consider two things in Google Drive requests. First you should use Google APIs to process the requests. This means, you'll have to have an authenticated requests through OAuth2 protocols.

            If you're using their NuGets, then you can simply use the DriveService to get the file size.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63320351

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install use-http

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            If you need support for IE, you will need to add additional polyfills. The React docs suggest these polyfills, but from this issue we have found it to work fine with the react-app-polyfill. If you have any updates to this browser list, please submit a PR!.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries

            Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link