evangelist | Library of helpers | Functional Programming library

The intention is to display an item from a list of objects but on every page refresh, the item should be randomly chosen from the list. Here, Testimonials is the list and I want to display any random item from this list. If I use a constant, it works fine. When I use, the random function, it does not display proper image with its associated item message.

I use React 16, Next.js, styled components as the tech.

The problem is in rendering of Employees section. The console displays a warning as

warning.js?6327:33 Warning: Propsrcdid not match. Server: "/static/images/testimonials/2.jpg" Client: "/static/images/testimonials/5.png"

Here is the piece of my code

I'm following Twillio's guide on responding to incoming SMS.

Everything works as expected. I'm getting the webhook and the reply is sent to a verified number (I'm using a trial account).

The problem I'm having is getting the contents of the incoming message. I tried to get the contents through $_POST and php://input but both are empty. I want to get the contents in order to send to our info mailbox.

This is my replyToSMS.php:

I'm attempting to lay the foundation for a relatively simple messaging system using Twilio API and its Python wrapper. Users should be able to text a keyword and receive back a string of responses.

The problem is, using the suggested HttpResponse() package from Twilio's documentation, when I loop through the messages to add them to a response chain, they hit Twilio in a block, and sends the service sends them in a seemingly random order, which really compromises the readability of the block.

Here's a simplified version of the loop I'm running in Django to create the response:

I live in a very safety/critical Ada-ic environment, and have taken the habit of having well defined and bounded type definition. I am also confronted to lots ASN1 usage/evangelists.

One of the key features that some people around me define as superior in ASN1 over protocol buffers is the ability to define, and therefore check, data range.

So,

• Is it true that protocol buffers do not have any range definition system ?
• Are there any means on top of protocol buffer that could provide such a feature ?

Usual numerical types definition such as int32, int64 is out of scope here.

I read this Google overview and found no reference to any data range definition. Except for features concerning the enum management/representation, and some ordering features.

To give some other references, I heard of/read the links below and became aware of an Ada implementation project.

Does anyone know of an Ada plugin for protocol buffers?

which led to

http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:690878/FULLTEXT02.pdf

https://github.com/persan/protobuf-ada

I could use some insight from a Twilio Evangelist. My company is using Twilio to call patients registered to our platform. The Twilio device is setup upon the user logging into the system and then they can either call a patient from their Patient Profile page or enter a manual number from their clinic's to call a prospective patient. I'm encountering an interesting error however as depending on the location the call is initiated from we want a different handler function to fire when the call is Disconnected. As it stands right now, when you first initiate a call from a Patient Profile page and pass a patientCalled object to the callPatient function the system works fine. However if you then move over to your Clinic page and initiate a call in which case patientCalled is "none, the event handler from the call initiated on the Patient Page still fires.

Can you only register an event handler to a twilio Device connection state once? Here's my code, we're running react-redux.

I'm trying to have the ability to update a call to dial it into a conference, and then I want to keep track of which phone numbers are in the conference. I'll already have the phone number before updating the call, so my plan was to add it as parameter to the statusCallback, then when someone joins, I'll know which phone number has joined (or left). Here is the Twiml I'm using to update the call into the conference.

I'm using kubectl to control a local microk8s installation. I configured a local Google cloud shell connection in order to avoid the ridiculous provisioning of the machine available through the GKE dashboard.

Now, kubectl commands seem to be randomly executed on microk8s and GKE. I want not only to fix this, but prohibit this scenario for the future.

The possibility that kubectl can refer to different environment is a horrible idea apparently founded in concept of the kubectl CLI which provides no way to specify a remote cluster. It can lead to accidental changes on production systems. Even a hardcore 12-factor evangelist will have a local cluster installed for development.

Not looking for opinions. I'm searching for data.

As it is now, I want to become a webM evangelist. However, I assume there are some actual technical reasons why mp4 is preferred over webm in the bigger picture. I want to know them so I can be accurate in my assessments.

I'm working on developing a broadcast video messaging graphics engine (think chyron) and using the Chromium engine like OBS does for messaging. So far the results have been excellent.

One of the best features I've found is using webm for video. I should note I am using small (640x480 max) videos as graphics that are on top off a larger full HD video.

Not only does it seem to have a better compression:quality ratio than mp4 for my use case, the most important thing is that it has full alpha support, which allows for excellent layering of video objects on top of each other in the HTML DOM, in real time, with no noticable performance hits.

Aside from it's predecessor, FLV, I can't think of another high quality, high compression codec that also supports alpha. I feel like you are stuck using pro-res 4444 or the ancient animation codec to reliable distribute video with an alpha.

So, that said, are there technical reasons why webM isn't more adopted than mp4?

I already know the obvious, that there is dedicated hardware to decode mp4. But, is there any technicality that would prevent a hardware webM decoder? I really want to understand more what the benefits of mp4 are over webM, which i assume is why it is more widely used than webM.

Thanks!

I have created a linked list, now I am trying to read data in from a file however every time a new entry is read and assigned to the structure the first node is reassigned and removes the data from the previous entry. I would like to find out why my code is doing this.