modular | A modular front end development framework | Frontend Framework library

You should try to export the model using torch.onnx. The page gives you an example that you can start with.

An alternative is to use TorchScript, but that requires torch libraries.

Both of these can be run without python. You can load torchscript in a C++ application https://pytorch.org/tutorials/advanced/cpp_export.html

ONNX is much more portable and you can use in languages such as C#, Java, or Javascript https://onnxruntime.ai/ (even on the browser)

Just modifying a little your example to go over the errors I found

Notice that via tracing any if/elif/else, for, while will be unrolled

You can take a look at the .Net implémentation here and the java ones here.
It appears that the java ones was more heavily studied.

UPDATE: (module-info.java)

Per your comment, your original setup used JDK 9+ modules. That's a complex and confusing topic. It would be easiest to simply remove module-info.java and not use modules. If you intend to use modules and keep resources in a separate directory (module), there are multiple options with no one clear choice. Perhaps the easiest option would be to open the "package" containing the resource. Something like this worked in my local test:

Do you use a MaterialApp, CupertinoApp, or WidgetsApp somewhere ? If so, you could use the onUnknownRoute property:

Line 29 of Login: await addDoc(collection(db, 'users', userData.uid), {

userData.uid is likely the culprit since userData is still the initial empty string ('') state value. Remember, React state updates are asynchronously processed, so the setUserData(user) won't have updated the userData state yet when it's referenced a few lines below in collection(db, 'users', userData.uid).

I suggest splitting out the second half of the registro function into an useEffect hook with a dependency on the userData state to issue the side-effect of adding the document.

React Firebase Hooks v4 has been released which supports v9 and also requires React 16.8.0 or later and Firebase v9.0.0 or later.

The React Firebase Hooks library doesn't seem to support Firebase Modular SDK yet (last release April 2021). You might have to use compat version which allows to use older name-spaced syntax even in v9.0.0+ and does not have benefits of tree-shaking :

It looks like, in calculate_community_modularity, you use greedy_modularity_communities to create a dict, modularity_dict, which maps a node in your graph to a community. If I understand correctly, you can take each subgraph community in modularity_dict and pass it into shannon_entropy to calculate the entropy for that community.

this is pseudo code, so there may be some errors. This should convey the principle, though.

after running calculate_community_modularity, you have a dict like this, where the key is each node, and the value is that which the community belongs to

You are creating a new module layer containing two modules and establishing access of one of these modules to the other. However, you actually want to establishing access for the currently running main method to one the these modules.

The currently running main method can’t be part of the new module layer it just creates. Assuming standard launcher setup, it belongs to a Controller module loaded by the system class loader as part of the boot-layer.

So, instead of granting access to a new module of the same name in the new layer, you have to change the code to grant access to the already loaded Controller module. Since the new Controller module of the new module layer serves no purpose then, you can remove it from the layer configuration.

As it turns out I didn't need any of those. Since I am using a CustomSliverAppbar called MerchantSliverAppbar I wrapped it with a SliverOverlapAbsorber in the following way: