Analog | Experimental implementation of Angular components | Frontend Framework library

What's happening here is a pretty subtle behavior.

The expression x.$data evaluates to a Published.Publisher. When you subscribe to a Published.Publisher, it publishes its current value immediately, and then each time the Published property receives a new value, the publisher publishes the new value before the new value is stored in the property.

This behavior is documented in the Published reference:

When the property changes, publishing occurs in the property’s willSet block, meaning subscribers receive the new value before it’s actually set on the property.

This means when you call x.setData(), the outer subscription receives the new value ("DATA") in v1, but x.data at that point still evaluates to nil. And when you create the inner subscription to x.$data, it immediately publishes its currently stored value, which is still nil.

Found the answer in this post ("Duh" moment the instant I saw it!)

I had forgotten to close the connected and listening sockets in the forked child, which were inherited by the spawned daemon and stayed open as long as it runs. Here's the code I'm using to spawn a process that will be left running (daemonized):

The Elasticsearch equivalent to IsSortable is adding a new field of keyword type with doc_values enabled to your index (assuming more recent versions of Elasticsearch). There is a storage cost to enabling sorting, but Azure Cognitive Search is smart about re-using the same storage for similar features, so if you've already set IsFilterable or IsFacetable, there's a good chance you won't incur much if any extra cost for IsSortable. I'm being vague here because it depends on the shape of your index and implementation details are subject to change. There is no substitute for experimenting with your own data.

spec.containers.ports is an array, which means you can specify multiple ports like so in your Pod definition:

The complexity of O(V+E) holds good only if each node is visited once. In your code you visit a node and mark it as visited but after parent is done, you are marking it as not visited.

So when the next child is processed, it will visit its parent again. If a parent has 4 children it will be visited by its children 1 extra time, making it 4 visits for each node and complexity is 4x4x...(MN) = 4^MN.

You remove visited[i][j] = false, and you will see that a node once visited is never visited again and complexity is O(number of nodes) = O(MN)

We can use the results of the first search to boost the score of the second, based on which movie node the actor node acted in.

You haven't told us what you want to do with the scores mathematically, so for this example I'll just add them.

Not sure if this is what you're after. Two options. First will aggregate the counts (separately) associated with each date in an object. The second aggregates them together

Persons Controller:

gl.bindTexture binds the texture to the active texture unit. The active texture unit is a global state and can be changed with gl.activeTexture. Every time gl.activeTexture is called, the active texture unit is changed. This affects all subsequent calls to gl.bindTexture.
The 2nd line in loadTexture is gl.bindTexture(gl.TEXTURE_2D, texture) and binds the texture to the randomly set texture unit.
Use the texture unit 0 (gl.TEXTURE0) in loadTexture to load the texture. After loading the textures, bind them to specific texture units. Alternatively, you can pass a specific texture unit to loadTexture and use it when loading the texture.