core | Boost Core Utilities | SDK library

I built an app using Django 3.2.3., but when I try to settup my javascript code for the HTML, it doesn't work. I have read this post Django Static Files Development and follow the instructions, but it doesn't resolve my issue.

Also I couldn't find TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS, according to this post no TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS in django, from 1.7 Django and later, TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS is the same as TEMPLATE to config django.core.context_processors.static but when I paste that code, turns in error saying django.core.context_processors.static doesn't exist.

I don't have idea why my javascript' script isn't working.

The configurations are the followings

Settings.py

I am trying to use dotenv and jest together, and run into an error immediately.

A single test file, tests/authenticationt.test.ts with only

I have the wackiest bug. Like....the wackiest! If any of ya'll want to put eyes on this, awesomesauce! I really appriciate it! I am creating a survey with REACT, Redux, SQL, HML, Material-ui, and CSS.

I've created a graph of information with am4charts using data from a database. Everything is working and will show up on the page......but not on page load. What I am seeing in my console is that the page will load, it fires off my get request but doesn't return with the data fast enough (I think). By the time that the get request loads, my graph has populated with no data.

Here is the code that I have for the page that I am rendering. What is really odd is that, once my code has run, I can cut a line of code (I've been using a console log). And then the graph will render and load.

I'm trying to implement a Select component using reactjs material ui and typescript.

However, I am getting the following typing error:

I am currently trying to build OpenPose. First, I will try to describe the environment and then the error emerging from it. Caffe, being built from source, resides in its entirety in [/Users...]/openpose/3rdparty instead of the usual location (I redact some parts of the filepaths in this post for privacy). All of its include files can be found in [/Users...]/openpose/3rdparty/caffe/include/caffe. After entering this command:

I wish to suggest (perhaps enforce, but I am not firm on the semantics yet) a particular format for the output of a PowerShell function.

about_Format.ps1xml (versioned for PowerShell 7.1) says this: 'Beginning in PowerShell 6, the default views are defined in PowerShell source code. The Format.ps1xml files from PowerShell 5.1 and earlier versions don't exist in PowerShell 6 and later versions.'. The article then goes on to explain how Format.ps1xml files can be used to change the display of objects, etc etc. This is not very explicit: 'don't exist' -ne 'cannot exist'...

This begs several questions:

1. Although they 'don't exist', can Format.ps1xml files be created/used in versions of PowerShell greater than 5.1?
2. Whether they can or not, is there some better practice for suggesting to PowerShell how a certain function should format returned data? Note that inherent in 'suggest' is that the pipeline nature of PowerShell's output must be preserved: the user must still be able to pipe the output of the function to Format-List or ForEach-Object etc..

For example, the Get-ADUser cmdlet returns objects formatted by Format-List. If I write a function called Search-ADUser that calls Get-ADUser internally and returns some of those objects, the output will also be formatted as a list. Piping the output to Format-Table before returning it does not satisfy my requirements, because the output will then not be treated as separate objects in a pipeline.

Example code:

So I initialized CAS using cas-initializr with the following command inside the cas folder:

This is pretty straight forward but after much Googling and experimenting, I cannot find the answer. I will use this as an example and then I can apply it to other scripts I am writing. When I run this command

I am querying a database for an item using R2DBC and Spring Integration. I want to extend the transaction boundary a bit to include a handler - if the handler fails I want to roll back the database operation. But I'm having difficulty even establishing transactionality explicitly in my integration flow. The flow is defined as