mp11 | C++11 | SDK library
kandi X-RAY | mp11 Summary
kandi X-RAY | mp11 Summary
Mp11 is a C++11 metaprogramming library based on template aliases and variadic templates. It implements the approach outlined in the article "Simple C++11 metaprogramming" and its sequel. Mp11 is part of Boost, starting with release 1.66.0. It however has no Boost dependencies and can be used standalone, as a Git submodule, for instance. For CMake users, add_subdirectory is supported, as is installation and find_package(boost_mp11).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of mp11
mp11 Key Features
mp11 Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on mp11
QUESTION
Here is the troublesome code
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-22 at 14:21My compiler (GCC10) straight up informs me that your type id is wrong:
QUESTION
This is probably a weird use case, but I am trying to hack around the fact string literals can not be used as arguments to templates using std::array
as non template type parameter.
This works but with extreme limitation that all strings must be of same length(I could use MAX_STR_LEN=100
or whatever and make all arrays that size, but that feels ugly...).
Is there a way to make this code work so that different size std::array
s can be accepted as template parameter?
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-27 at 18:01Sure, why not use a requires requires clause?
QUESTION
I have the following code where I implement dispatching on runtime value to interpret the data in certain way(in this toy example data can be either uint8_t or short).
Code seems to work, but I am wondering if I can somehow microoptimize the code so that when I have a hit(processing function matches) processing is stopped (currently even if first element of tuple is a "handler" entire tuple is iterated over at runtime).
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-12 at 18:43The runtime performance of this heavily depends on the size of your tuple. You can make your own for_each_tuple
implementation that does an early out when your function gets executed:
QUESTION
For a better understanding and learning, I tried to use the boost mp11 library to implement the Dimensional Analysis from "C++ Template Metaprogramming" book (also found in the documentation of boost mpl library). A reason why was that C++11 has features that weren't available when the book was written, features that are very useful now.
I am using Visual Studio 2019, community version.
All went well until I had to implement the operator*. I couldn't perform the trick that was used for the mpl library. Operator+ worked well, so the problem must be similar to the one pointed out in the book, but should have a different solution. Please, help me to find it.
The (shortest possible) example code is below. It gets compiled and runs correctly. When the last 3 lines are uncommented, one gets the error:
error C2676: binary '*': 'quantity' does not define this operator or a conversion to a type acceptable to the predefined operator
For some reason, operator* is invisible, while similar operator+ is.
Thank you
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-06 at 13:44There are multiple problems with the code. After fixing some, but not all, here is a working version: https://godbolt.org/z/3B9Sc4
Here are some of the modifications:
The use of
std::integral_constant
is unnecessary. You can simply useconstexpr int
s. This allows simplifying yourmp_plus
significantly, and:The template parameters in
mp_transform_impl
are needlessly complicated. You don't need classesL1
,L2
when always working withstd::integer_sequence
.With your
mp_transform
you don't need to addtypename
and::type
.
QUESTION
I am trying to learn basics of boost::mp11, docs are ok, but one thing I do not understand is the following: what is the purpose of quoted metafunctions? Docs say this:
...A quoted metafunction is a class with a public metafunction member called fn, for example
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-05 at 23:04From slide 14 in http://www.pdimov.com/cpp2/mp11_slides.pdf:
So basically, this seems to be your guidance:
When you get the "can’t expand into a fixed parameter list" error, try quoting the metafunction and using the _q algorithm instead
QUESTION
I wonder why the following code does not work as expected(is_numeric is always 0).
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-02 at 09:31You are comparing against std::remove_cvref
, which itself is a type and rightfully not a numerical. But I assume you want to test against the type produced from the trait: std::remove_cvref::type
, or better std::remove_cvref_t
.
Now
QUESTION
I have 2 tables, tableStock and tableParts:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-25 at 16:59You can use left join
. Here is the demo.
QUESTION
template
struct createP2E
{ static constexpr std::size_t SIZE = 1;
static constexpr std::size_t P2E[SIZE] = {ENUM};
};
template
struct combine;
template<>
struct combine<2>, createP2E<3> >
{ static constexpr std::size_t SIZE = 2;
static constexpr std::size_t P2E[2] = {2, 3};
typedef combine type;
};
template
struct combine
{ typedef A type;
};
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-19 at 18:58I guess it can be done. As you already have stated, the core problem here is append one array to another and then sort it. Here is a solution to this problem based on c++17. Unfortunately, it uses std::arrays
and not c-array as you do.
I simply combined this answer and this code to get (full credit to them):
QUESTION
In C++, I'm trying to write something similar to boost-mp11's mp_for_each
. However, whilst mp_for_each
always calls the supplied function for every T
in the given mp_list
, I'm trying to come up with a solution that stops traversal once a run-time call to the function yields a value evaluating to false
in an if-statement.
See the implementation of mp_for_each
and a usage example:
Usage example in Boost reference manual
Apparently, the implementation of mp_for_each
manages to pass the function argument as a constant expression, thus enabling the user to apply it where a constant expression is required. Whilst I took a different approach incorporating template tail recursion, I expected the function argument to be passed as a constant expression as welll. However, GCC complains that it "is not a constant expression".
My code looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-07 at 20:19Parameter of lambda is a parameter of function, its value is not passed at compile-time. At very least this line is ill-formed:
QUESTION
The following command builds boost using VCPKG.
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-23 at 01:55It turns out that it is possible to build all of Boost while using ICU for those components that support the ICU feature, as follows.
./vcpkg install boost-locale[icu] boost-regex[icu] boost --triplet x64-windows --recurse
Source: How do I build boost with ICU support without having to build most components of boost twice?
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install mp11
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page