GUnit | GUnit - Google.Test/Google.Mock/Cucumber on steroids | Functional Testing library

In WPF, when your app is rendered, the actual height is set to a maximum of the bounds of your monitor. It make sense, since in normal time you wouldn't want a window bigger than your monitor.

The snapshot you take of your window take only in consideration the rendered part, which is leaving out some elements in your case.

To circumvent this, you want to let the window go as big as it want. Since you don't know the height of the window, what you can do here is to set an arbitrary MinHeight value to make sure your window encompass everything.

Since it won't be displayed on screen and we don't care if the window is out of bounds, we'll use 3000 here.

From there, we'll use your Add-ContentRendered scriptblock and calculate the actual height of our Grid (Header + Datagrid + Footer).

We'll then reset the MinHeight and Height attribute of our window to that size, so our snapshot does not include the empty space.

Here's the affected part of your code and what it looks with the modification

You can not insert more than 1000 records using laravel insert() method. If you want to achieve expected output then you can use array_chunk function of php or collection of laravel. For example using array_chunk :

Somewhere in your config you have the following line

You need to test that all the available correct samples you can lay your hands on are parsed successfully, and that as many error cases you can reasonably and economically find or create produce parsing errors. The former is a lot more important than the latter. Yu oh also he'd t check that the obvious things like operator precedence and if/else shift-reduce conflicts are handled correctly, via testing of whatever the output is.

Implicit classes don't work that way. They are a shorthand for implicit conversions. For instance implicit class Foo(i: Int) is equal to class Foo(i: Int); implicit def Foo(i: Int) = new Foo(i). So it only works with classes that have exactly one parameter in their constructor. It would not make sense for most 0 parameter (type-)classes.

The title of your question also seems to suggest that you think the compilation error is talking about type parameters of the type constructor, but I hope the above paragraph also makes clear that it is actually talking about value parameters of the value constructor.

For what (I think) you are trying to do, you will have to provide an implicit instance of CollectC yourself. I suggest putting it in the companion object of Collect. But you can choose an alternative solution if that fits your needs better.