Rseq | Restartable Sequences : a userspace implementation | GPU library

i would propose gathering all the polynom print parts altogether into a flat collection, and then print all of them to string. Could look like this:

The purpose seems to be to sync up syscall numbers across architectures (source).

Viewing the git blame for the commented line in that file, one can find this commit message:

arch: add split IPC system calls where needed

The IPC system call handling is highly inconsistent across architectures, some use sys_ipc, some use separate calls, and some use both. We also have some architectures that require passing IPC_64 in the flags, and others that set it implicitly.

For the addition of a y2038 safe semtimedop() system call, I chose to only support the separate entry points, but that requires first supporting the regular ones with their own syscall numbers.

The IPC_64 is now implied by the new semctl/shmctl/msgctl system calls even on the architectures that require passing it with the ipc() multiplexer.

I'm not adding the new semtimedop() or semop() on 32-bit architectures, those will get implemented using the new semtimedop_time64() version that gets added along with the other time64 calls. Three 64-bit architectures (powerpc, s390 and sparc) get semtimedop().

Try insert from select syntax.

You need to tell the build system that your system call requires 2 arguments and that they are of type int. This is so that the scripts that are part of the build system will generate appropriate wrappers for casting the arguments into the type you require. Instead of defining the actual handler like you did, you should use -

PRACK's aren't supported in the SIPSorcery SIP implementation (they're not part of the main specification and aren't very common).

The approach would be to use the uac.ServerInviteTransaction to generate the PRACK request based on the GetInTransactionACKRequest.

A better place for this question would be on github and if you still have the need I can add it relatively quickly.

Solved the problem by creating a type Predicate [T] = {String, T => Boolean}.

Then modified the code as:

Maybe try running:

By default, GHC runs all programs using a single OS thread, even with -threaded enabled. Note the text "using -N1" in your output - it indicates that the program is being run with 1 physical thread.

In short: pass e.g. +RTS -N8 to your program. For documentation of this flag, see here.

In a broad sense, this is due to the distinction between parallelism and concurrency. Here are some SO questions which try to explain the difference. The difference can be summarized as:

• parrallelism: a task subdivided into similar chunks to run simultaneously on separate cores/CPUs at some point in time; for increased speed

• concurrency: several tasks being executed conceptually independently such that their execution times overlap, whether on the same thread through time slicing or on separate cores/CPUs; usually utilizing shared resources more efficiently

However, these definitions are somewhat contentious; sometimes the two have opposite meanings, and sometimes they are used interchangeably. However, for the purpose of understanding this problem (why you must pass another flag in addition to -threaded to make a 'parallel' program actually run in parallel) I believe they are useful definitions.

I can reproduce your behaviour (ghc-8.2.1, parallel-3.2.1.1).

Later on down the Strategies.hs is a RULES pragma that special-cases parList rseq. I guess it is a bug that it has different behaviour to parTraversable (I don't know enough about the internals to be sure where the bug lies). I'd suggest filing a ticket at the parallel issue tracker: https://github.com/haskell/parallel/issues

Here is the code in question, starting at line 505 of the file: