lscm | Least squares conformal mapping implemented in C | Map library
kandi X-RAY | lscm Summary
kandi X-RAY | lscm Summary
Least squares conformal mapping implemented in C++
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of lscm
lscm Key Features
lscm Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on lscm
QUESTION
I have been using LSCM parameterizer to unwrap a mesh. I would like to obtain a 2d planar model with accurate measurements such that if you make a paper cutout you could wrap it up back to the original model physically.
It seems that SMP::parameterize() is scaling the resulting OFF down to 1mm by 1mm. How to I get an OFF file with accurate measurements? scaled down.
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Dec-03 at 08:27A paramterization is a UV map, associating 2D coordinates to 3D points, and such coordinates are always between 0,0 and 1,1. That's why you get a 1mm/1mm result. I guess you could compare a 3D edge length with it's 2D version in the map and scale your 2D model by this factor. Maybe perform a mean to be a bit more precise.
QUESTION
I am trying to modify CGAL-4.13/examples/Surface_mesh_parameterization/lscm.cpp
so that the order of the vertices in the resulting off file is the same as in the input file.
Take a file input.off
with the following simple content:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-27 at 16:03The following issue answers this question.
QUESTION
I am able to use CGAL surface mesh parametrization with given examples easily. Which means that CGAL is installed properly and is functional. Ways to reproduce error:
- Create a empty main file
- Create a class file with appropriate modifications to CGAL square_border_parametrize.cpp
- After I do
cmake .
andmake
this is the output ...
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Apr-26 at 12:46A quick fix: In the file include/CGAL/Surface_mesh_parameterization/Error_code.h write inline
in front of const char* get_error_message(int error_code)
.
The fix is in this pull request, that is now merged in CGAL-4.12.
QUESTION
When running the SonarQube 5.6 using Jazz RTC plugin 1.1 in a maven build to get blame information from an RTC project I am hitting the following and no blame information is being collected:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jan-03 at 15:07Fixed in SonarQube version 5.6.7
QUESTION
I am trying to use the RTC lscm
CLI tool to promote change sets from my dev stream (i.e. from a dev stream workspace) to my test stream.
When I try promoting the change set, 90% of the time I get something like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jul-12 at 04:36That looks like the change set 1802 is the result of applying a patch from the Pending Changes view.
You can see an example in this thread "Reversing a work item with two change sets"
Right-click on
CS2
in the History view and select "Reverse
". This will add a pending patch to the Pending Changes view. Now you can either try to 'auto-resolve' the changes if nothing conflicts, otherwise you will have to manually merge the changes.
Whether it auto-resolves or if you manually merged the changes, it will appear as an unresolved pending change in the "Unresolved" folder. You can now check-in the file changes into a new change set. To help you can also name this new change set "reversal of CS2". You can then deliver it to the stream.
So check if you can do the same and first check-in 1802 as a new change set, then deliver it.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install lscm
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page