MBS | Minimum Barrier Salient Object Detection | Computer Vision library

I'm trying to scrape csrf token from a website. However, the script that I created fails miserably even when the very token is available in page source. This is the site url.

I've tried with:

I have a Yarn monorepo (workspace) with 2 packages: backend (Node.js/TypeScript) and frontend (React/Typescript).

/package.json (trimmed)

I have table in postgresql that has the following values:

I have a simple script that fetch from a mongodb collection. However, calling cursor.hasNext() or cursor.next() after exceeding the batch size always return an error:

I am trying for opportunities to optimize the below typescript function. Need some advise on the same.

I tried to optimize the

I am trying to use pathos for triggering multiprocessing within a function. I notice, however, an odd behaviour and don't know why:

Recently I started having some problems with Django (3.1) tests, which I finally tracked down to some kind of memory leak. I normally run my suite (roughly 4000 tests at the moment) with --parallel=4 which results in a high memory watermark of roughly 3GB (starting from 500MB or so). For auditing purposes, though, I occasionally run it with --parallel=1 - when I do this, the memory usage keeps increasing, ending up over the VM's allocated 6GB.

I spent some time looking at the data and it became clear that the culprit is, somehow, Webtest - more specifically, its response.html and response.forms: each call during the test case might allocate a few MBs (two or three, generally) which don't get released at the end of the test method and, more importantly, not even at the end of the TestCase.

I've tried everything I could think of - gc.collect() with gc.DEBUG_LEAK shows me a whole lot of collectable items, but it frees no memory at all; using delattr() on various TestCase and TestResponse attributes and so on resulted in no change at all, etc.

I'm quite literally at my wits' end, so any pointer to solve this (beside editing the thousand or so tests which use WebTest responses, which is really not feasible) would be very much appreciated.

(please note that I also tried using guppy and tracemalloc and memory_profiler but neither gave me any kind of actionable information.)

I found that one of our EC2 testing instances isn't affected by the problem, so I spent some more time trying to figure this out. Initially, I tried to find the "sensible" potential causes - for instance, the cached template loader, which was enabled on my local VM and disabled on the EC2 instance - without success. Then I went all in: I replicated the EC2 virtualenv (with pip freeze) and the settings (copying the dotenv), and checked out the same commit where the tests were running normally on the EC2.

Et voilà! THE MEMORY LEAK IS STILL THERE!

Now, I'm officially giving up and will use --parallel=2 for future tests until some absolute guru can point me in the right directions.

And now the memory leak is there even with --parallel=2. I guess that's somehow better, since it looks increasingly like it's a system problem rather than an application problem. Doesn't solve it but at least I know it's not my fault.

Thanks to Tim Boddy's reply to this question I tried using chap to figure out what's making memory grow. Unfortunately I can't "read" the results properly but it looks like some non-python library is actually causing the problem. So, this is what I've seen analyzing the core after a few minutes running the tests that I know cause the leak:

Following the instructions in this IBM article, I have included a link to a record in an comm template. My link looks like this http://:HOSTNAME/maximo/ui/maximo.jsp?event=loadapp&value=:APP&uniqueid=:OWNERID.

This link from the IBM article only gets to the default, i.e "List" tab for most applications. Can I somehow add a specific tab (standard or custom) of named application when implementing this as a link in Comm Template?

Upon creation of a automation script in IBM Control Desk / Maximo an array of implicit variables are created, according to the IBM docs:

Implicit variables are variables that you do not define. These variables are automatically provided by the framework. Some implicit variables are valid only when associated with a declared variable while others are not associated with any other variables.

In addition to implicit variables, a Maximo® business object (MBO) is also available to every script. You refer to the current business object by using the mbo reserved word.

From these docs:

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSANHD_7.6.0/com.ibm.mbs.doc/autoscript/r_variables_automation_scripts.html

When trying to use mbo with the following code inside a newly created Automation Script with no launch point: