gbhv | Simple x86-64 VT-x Hypervisor with EPT | Infrastructure Automation library
kandi X-RAY | gbhv Summary
kandi X-RAY | gbhv Summary
Intel's hardware assisted virtualization technology (originally Vanderpool, later renamed VT-X/VMX) is a set of processor features which add support for virtualized operating systems without the use of emulation. In the typical ring protection design of an x86 processor running a modern operating system, there are two main rings of operation: The high privilege kernel-mode ring (Ring 0) and low privilege user-mode ring (Ring 3). Any code running in a higher ring has full privileged access to the code and data of rings below it. In old, non-hardware assisted virtualization, Virtual Machine Monitors (VMM) would execute at Ring 0 and attempt to intercept certain privileged actions using very slow binary translation mechanisms. With the invention of VT-X, a new mode of operation was introduced in hardware to provide the VMMs with a more privileged position over the guest operating systems that it manages. This new processor mode is named VMX Root Mode, and it executes at a mode more privileged than Ring 0, sometimes informally known as "Ring -1". In this higher privileged mode, the hypervisor uses its privilege to isolate memory and devices of multiple running operating systems into separate containerized environments while still achieving close to native processor execution speeds. The central mechanism by which the processor enters and exits VMX Root Mode is through context switches known as "VM Exits" and "VM Resumes". When a guest operating system performs a privileged operation that the VMM has been configured to intercept, the processor saves its current state and performs a VM Exit where it "exits" out of the guest operating system and into Root Mode. From the exit handler, the hypervisor can perform operations in its high privilege mode to handle the exit condition, and then "resume" back into the guest by restoring the processor context and continuing execution, returning the system back down to its original privilege level. This kind of processor switch will feel familiar for those who have a solid understanding of how interrupts are serviced in modern operating systems. Not long after the release of VMX came a new feature called Extended Page Tables which significantly increased the functional power of hypervisors over the operating system. With EPT, hypervisors gained the ability to "virtualize" physical memory regions using a very similar kind of multilevel page tables that operating systems use to manage virtual memory. This allows a hypervisor to define and set memory protections for regions of memory at the physical memory level without any ability to interact from the guest operating system. In addition, EPT has a special ability to create "Execute-only" pages, or pages which can not be read or written to but can only be executed on the processor. This feature gave rise to a new kind of hooking mechanism, where a stealthy VMM can intercept attempts to execute a page and swaps in a modified page with new code. If something tries to verify the contents by reading to the code page, the VMM recieves a VM Exit due to the processor trying to read from an "Execute-only" page. This allows the VMM to quickly swap in a "clean" version of the page, making the reader believe that no code modification has taken place. This power over the underlying physical memory gives hypervisors total control of the code and data of the currently executing operating system.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of gbhv
gbhv Key Features
gbhv Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Infrastructure Automation
QUESTION
I have an RDS DB instance (Aurora PostgreSQL) setup in my AWS account. This was created manually using AWS Console. I now want to create CloudFormation template Yaml for that DB, which I can use to create the DB later if needed. That will also help me replicate the DB in another environment. I would also use that as part of my Infrastructure automation.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-05 at 00:59Unfortunately, there is no such functionality provided by AWS.
However, you mean hear about two options that people could wrongfully recommend.
CloudFormer is a template creation beta tool that creates an AWS CloudFormation template from existing AWS resources in your account. You select any supported AWS resources that are running in your account, and CloudFormer creates a template in an Amazon S3 bucket.
Although it sounds good, the tool is no longer maintained and its not reliable (for years in beta).
Importing Existing Resources Into a Stack
Often people mistakenly think that this "generates yaml" for you from existing resources. The truth is that it does not generate template files for you. You have to write your own template which matches your resource exactly, before you can import any resource under control to CloudFormation stack.
Your only options is to manually write the template for the RDS and import it, or look for an external tools that could reverse-engineer yaml templates from existing resources.
QUESTION
I'm struggling to set up a CI process for a web application in Azure. I'm used to deploying built code directly into Web Apps in Azure but decided to use docker this time.
In the build pipeline, I build the docker images and push them to an Azure Container Registry, tagged with the latest build number. In the release pipeline (which has DEV, TEST and PROD), I need to deploy those images to the Web Apps of each environment. There are 2 relevant tasks available in Azure releases: "Azure App Service deploy" and "Azure Web App for Containers". Neither of these allow the image source for the Web App to be set to Azure Conntainer Registry. Instead they take custom registry/repository names and set the image source in the Web App to Private Registry, which then requires login and password. I'm also deploying all Azure resources using ARM templates so I don't like the idea of configuring credentials when the 2 resources (the Registry and the Web App) are integrated already. Ideally, I would be able to set the Web App to use the repository and tag in Azure Container Registry that I specify in the release. I even tried to manually configure the Web Apps first with specific repositories and tags, and then tried to change the tags used by the Web Apps with the release (with the tasks I mentioned) but it didn't work. The tags stay the same.
Another option I considered was to configure all Web Apps to specific and permanent repositories and tags (e.g. "dev-latest") from the start (which doesn't fit well with ARM deployments since the containers need to exist in the Registry before the Web Apps can be configured so my infrastructure automation is incomplete), enable "Continuous Deployment" in the Web Apps and then tag the latest pushed repositories accordingly in the release so they would be picked up by Web Apps. I could not find a reasoble way to add tags to existing repositories in the Registry.
What is Azure best practice for CI with containerised web apps? How do people actually build their containers and then deploy them to each environment?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-16 at 08:59Just set up a CI pipeline for building an image and pushing it to a container registry.
You could then use both Azure App Service deploy and Azure Web App for Containers task to handle the deploy.
The Azure WebApp Container task similar to other built-in Azure tasks, requires an Azure service connection as an input. The Azure service connection stores the credentials to connect from Azure Pipelines or Azure DevOps Server to Azure.
I'm also deploying all Azure resources using ARM templates so I don't like the idea of configuring credentials when the 2 resources (the Registry and the Web App)
You could also be able to Deploy Azure Web App for Containers with ARM and Azure DevOps.
How do people actually build their containers and then deploy them to each environment?
Kindly take a look at below blogs and official doc which may be helpful:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install gbhv
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page