gbhv | Simple x86-64 VT-x Hypervisor with EPT | Infrastructure Automation library

 by   Gbps C Version: Current License: CC-BY-4.0

kandi X-RAY | gbhv Summary

kandi X-RAY | gbhv Summary

gbhv is a C library typically used in Devops, Infrastructure Automation applications. gbhv has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Intel's hardware assisted virtualization technology (originally Vanderpool, later renamed VT-X/VMX) is a set of processor features which add support for virtualized operating systems without the use of emulation. In the typical ring protection design of an x86 processor running a modern operating system, there are two main rings of operation: The high privilege kernel-mode ring (Ring 0) and low privilege user-mode ring (Ring 3). Any code running in a higher ring has full privileged access to the code and data of rings below it. In old, non-hardware assisted virtualization, Virtual Machine Monitors (VMM) would execute at Ring 0 and attempt to intercept certain privileged actions using very slow binary translation mechanisms. With the invention of VT-X, a new mode of operation was introduced in hardware to provide the VMMs with a more privileged position over the guest operating systems that it manages. This new processor mode is named VMX Root Mode, and it executes at a mode more privileged than Ring 0, sometimes informally known as "Ring -1". In this higher privileged mode, the hypervisor uses its privilege to isolate memory and devices of multiple running operating systems into separate containerized environments while still achieving close to native processor execution speeds. The central mechanism by which the processor enters and exits VMX Root Mode is through context switches known as "VM Exits" and "VM Resumes". When a guest operating system performs a privileged operation that the VMM has been configured to intercept, the processor saves its current state and performs a VM Exit where it "exits" out of the guest operating system and into Root Mode. From the exit handler, the hypervisor can perform operations in its high privilege mode to handle the exit condition, and then "resume" back into the guest by restoring the processor context and continuing execution, returning the system back down to its original privilege level. This kind of processor switch will feel familiar for those who have a solid understanding of how interrupts are serviced in modern operating systems. Not long after the release of VMX came a new feature called Extended Page Tables which significantly increased the functional power of hypervisors over the operating system. With EPT, hypervisors gained the ability to "virtualize" physical memory regions using a very similar kind of multilevel page tables that operating systems use to manage virtual memory. This allows a hypervisor to define and set memory protections for regions of memory at the physical memory level without any ability to interact from the guest operating system. In addition, EPT has a special ability to create "Execute-only" pages, or pages which can not be read or written to but can only be executed on the processor. This feature gave rise to a new kind of hooking mechanism, where a stealthy VMM can intercept attempts to execute a page and swaps in a modified page with new code. If something tries to verify the contents by reading to the code page, the VMM recieves a VM Exit due to the processor trying to read from an "Execute-only" page. This allows the VMM to quickly swap in a "clean" version of the page, making the reader believe that no code modification has taken place. This power over the underlying physical memory gives hypervisors total control of the code and data of the currently executing operating system.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              gbhv has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 666 star(s) with 128 fork(s). There are 28 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 10 open issues and 18 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 140 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of gbhv is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              gbhv has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              gbhv has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              gbhv is licensed under the CC-BY-4.0 License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              gbhv releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of gbhv
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            gbhv Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for gbhv.

            gbhv Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for gbhv.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Create CloudFormation Yaml from existing RDS DB instance (Aurora PostgreSQL)
            Asked 2020-Jun-05 at 00:59

            I have an RDS DB instance (Aurora PostgreSQL) setup in my AWS account. This was created manually using AWS Console. I now want to create CloudFormation template Yaml for that DB, which I can use to create the DB later if needed. That will also help me replicate the DB in another environment. I would also use that as part of my Infrastructure automation.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jun-05 at 00:59

            Unfortunately, there is no such functionality provided by AWS.

            However, you mean hear about two options that people could wrongfully recommend.

            CloudFormer

            CloudFormer is a template creation beta tool that creates an AWS CloudFormation template from existing AWS resources in your account. You select any supported AWS resources that are running in your account, and CloudFormer creates a template in an Amazon S3 bucket.

            Although it sounds good, the tool is no longer maintained and its not reliable (for years in beta).

            Importing Existing Resources Into a Stack

            Often people mistakenly think that this "generates yaml" for you from existing resources. The truth is that it does not generate template files for you. You have to write your own template which matches your resource exactly, before you can import any resource under control to CloudFormation stack.

            Your only options is to manually write the template for the RDS and import it, or look for an external tools that could reverse-engineer yaml templates from existing resources.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62206364

            QUESTION

            Azure DevOps CI with Web Apps for Containers
            Asked 2020-Mar-16 at 08:59

            I'm struggling to set up a CI process for a web application in Azure. I'm used to deploying built code directly into Web Apps in Azure but decided to use docker this time.

            In the build pipeline, I build the docker images and push them to an Azure Container Registry, tagged with the latest build number. In the release pipeline (which has DEV, TEST and PROD), I need to deploy those images to the Web Apps of each environment. There are 2 relevant tasks available in Azure releases: "Azure App Service deploy" and "Azure Web App for Containers". Neither of these allow the image source for the Web App to be set to Azure Conntainer Registry. Instead they take custom registry/repository names and set the image source in the Web App to Private Registry, which then requires login and password. I'm also deploying all Azure resources using ARM templates so I don't like the idea of configuring credentials when the 2 resources (the Registry and the Web App) are integrated already. Ideally, I would be able to set the Web App to use the repository and tag in Azure Container Registry that I specify in the release. I even tried to manually configure the Web Apps first with specific repositories and tags, and then tried to change the tags used by the Web Apps with the release (with the tasks I mentioned) but it didn't work. The tags stay the same.

            Another option I considered was to configure all Web Apps to specific and permanent repositories and tags (e.g. "dev-latest") from the start (which doesn't fit well with ARM deployments since the containers need to exist in the Registry before the Web Apps can be configured so my infrastructure automation is incomplete), enable "Continuous Deployment" in the Web Apps and then tag the latest pushed repositories accordingly in the release so they would be picked up by Web Apps. I could not find a reasoble way to add tags to existing repositories in the Registry.

            What is Azure best practice for CI with containerised web apps? How do people actually build their containers and then deploy them to each environment?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Mar-16 at 08:59

            Just set up a CI pipeline for building an image and pushing it to a container registry.

            You could then use both Azure App Service deploy and Azure Web App for Containers task to handle the deploy.

            The Azure WebApp Container task similar to other built-in Azure tasks, requires an Azure service connection as an input. The Azure service connection stores the credentials to connect from Azure Pipelines or Azure DevOps Server to Azure.

            I'm also deploying all Azure resources using ARM templates so I don't like the idea of configuring credentials when the 2 resources (the Registry and the Web App)

            You could also be able to Deploy Azure Web App for Containers with ARM and Azure DevOps.

            How do people actually build their containers and then deploy them to each environment?

            Kindly take a look at below blogs and official doc which may be helpful:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60693622

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install gbhv

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/Gbps/gbhv.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone Gbps/gbhv

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:Gbps/gbhv.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular Infrastructure Automation Libraries

            terraform

            by hashicorp

            salt

            by saltstack

            pulumi

            by pulumi

            terraformer

            by GoogleCloudPlatform

            Try Top Libraries by Gbps

            CapcomLib

            by GbpsC++

            fastlog

            by GbpsPython

            pandos

            by GbpsC