Stream-Server | TCP based server that streams live audio | TCP library
kandi X-RAY | Stream-Server Summary
kandi X-RAY | Stream-Server Summary
A TCP based server that streams live audio to clients over the network. Can be used to broadcast audio to a group of willing listeners over a network. E.g. Broadcaster’s computer starts the server: ./server Starts talking etc…. Listener tunes in: python client.py [broadcaster’s IP]. This can also be useful when you want to use headphones while still remaining alert to your surroundings. Connect the client to localhost and your microphone will be fed into your speakers.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Stream-Server
Stream-Server Key Features
Stream-Server Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Stream-Server
QUESTION
Exactly what the title says, but for context:
I do have access to the upstream resource, and I am allowing all origins there.
When my NGINX conf does not include the directive add_header 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' '*'; my browser tells me:
Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'http://localhost/{{ upstream_path_redacted }}' from origin 'http://localhost:8080' has been blocked by CORS policy: Response to preflight request doesn't pass access control check: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource.
When I do include the above directive, my browser tells me
Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'http://localhost/{{ upstream_path_redacted }}' from origin 'http://localhost:8080' has been blocked by CORS policy: The 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header contains multiple values 'http://localhost:8080, *', but only one is allowed.
The second issue makes sense. As I stated, I am allowing all origins on the upstream server. I therefore don't understand why removing the directive causes the first issue.
My nginx.conf:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-22 at 15:26I'm not sure why I got downvoted without any feedback regarding my question or why I was being downvoted.
Anyways, after a few hours of keyboard mashing I got something to work.
Essentially, also serving the Vue app behind the NGINX reverse proxy, while it created more issues, solved the issue described above in the long run.
I had to add additional configuration to both my Vue app and my NGINX conf to enable all of Vue's development capabilities to work completely. Here's a minimal version of the final NGINX conf:
QUESTION
hello I am total beginner when it comes to nodejs. I was working on PHP code but found this app that will suit my needs for a project this is my first time to nodejs and managed to get this app working. https://github.com/KiraLT/torrent-stream-server . the command to get it running is torrent-stream-server serve which works great but i have to keep it running and not touch for it to work any help with this please? i have spent my whole night searching i found like forever and pm2 but i did not know how to use since serve command
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-22 at 20:40go to the folder path of project
npm i
npm install pm2@latest -g
pm2 start app_name if you want to run attached project to the question you can use this command:
pm2 start npm --name "app_name" -- startpm2 startup
pm2 save
note : pm2 startup can generate startup scripts and configure them in order to keep your process list intact across expected or unexpected machine restarts.
note : pm2 save to freeze a process list for automatic respawn
for managing application state is simple here are the commands :
QUESTION
First, I writing a server and a client thread refer from Beej's Guide to Network Programming.
And I made some changes as follow:
Server.c
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-10 at 07:46This is not related to networking at all. Threads are not guaranteed to be started in the same order that you specify, so this is pretty much normal. Please read about threading and if possible about POSIX threads so that you can get a better insight.
QUESTION
We use Docker containers to deploy multiple small applications on our servers that are reachable on the public internet. Some of the services need to communicate to each other, but are deployed on different servers, due to different hardware requirements (the servers are on different network and different IP).
Q: What would be the best way to configure blocking of incoming requests to SERVER:PORT except for some allowed IPs and at the same time allow all outgoing connections of the Docker containers?
Two major things we played with and tried out to get them working:
Bound Docker port mappings to 127.0.0.1 and route every traffic through an nginx. This is really config heavy and some infrastructure components aren't possible to proxy via http(s), so we need to add them to nginx.conf stream-server block and therefore open a port on the server (that is accessible by everyone).
Use iptables to restrict access to the published ports. So something like this:
iptables -A INPUT -I DOCKER-USER -p tcp -i eth0 -j DROP. But this also have 2 major downfalls. First it seems that it's quite hard to allow multiple IP adresses in such a construct and on the other hand this approach seems to block our docker outgoing connections (to the internet) as well. E. g.: After we activated it aping google.comfrom within a docker container was rejected.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-22 at 16:38Not sure I get this. In term of design, what is available to the external world is in a DMZ or published through an API gateway.
Your docker swarm/kubernetes cluster shall not be accessible directly through the internet or only the API gateway or the application on the DMZ.
So quite likely your docker server shall not be accessible directly. And even if that is the case, if you don't explicitely export a port to the host/outside of the cluster, it stay restricted to the virtuals networks of docker to allow cross container communication.
QUESTION
I'm using spring-cloud-sleuth and zipkin. In the producer, it worked.I can see message in kafka topic see image.
but in the consumer,some exception occur.
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Feb-07 at 09:49Usage of Sleuth Stream is deprecated. Please use the zipkin starter, add the Kafka dependency and set things as presented here https://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-static/Edgware.SR1/multi/multi__introduction.html#_sleuth_with_zipkin_via_rabbitmq_or_kafka
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-24 at 08:46From your pic, your Response body set the HTTP action body, you need set the Compose output, the below is my test result and i don't get your error. Maybe you could have a look. And looks like in your compose action, you set the value with wrong value, from your requirements, you need set them with HTTP get action output.
I test with a HTTP trigger.
And the below is my compose input:
QUESTION
I have a Nginx instance running, serving multiples sites under a common domain: cloud.example.org. For example, I serve website.cloud.example.org and admin.cloud.example.org.
I want to redirect cloud.example.org to website.cloud.example.org. But only the root /; So :
cloud.example.org--> redirect towebsite.cloud.example.orgcloud.example.org/any_kind_of_file_or_route--> not redirected
My configuration is as follows (I omit some irrelevant parts, like ssl):
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-15 at 10:18You can avoid the if statement by using two server blocks. And to avoid duplicating code, use the include directive and place the common lines of code into a separate file.
For example:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Stream-Server
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
