redsocks | transparent TCP-to-proxy redirector | Proxy library
kandi X-RAY | redsocks Summary
kandi X-RAY | redsocks Summary
Keep in mind, that changed GID affects filesystem permissions, so if your application creates some files, the files will be created with luser:socksified owner/group. So, if you're not the only user in the group socksified and your umask allows to create group-readable files and your directory permissions, and so on, blah-blah, etc. THEN you may expose your files to another user. Ok, you have been warned.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of redsocks
redsocks Key Features
redsocks Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on redsocks
QUESTION
I'm struggling from days with the realization of an idea to allow the configuration of a main proxy container that automatically redirect traffic from a port (80 and 443 in my case) to the container with a specific hostname/domain and dedicated SSL Certificate (not Let's encrypt etc.) that resides on final endpoint. The solution i'm looking for should create a "direct tunnel", based on source hostname/domain, to the final containers skipping the needs of an SSL certificate on proxy (passthrough).
I need it to allow multiple services to run on 443 (no i cannot use different ports with forwarding) on same Windows host.
Initially i've found nginx-proxy that automatically create a proxy_pass for each container that resides on current host, but i had some issues to configure it for SSL so i've moved on a pre-configured traefik container that works. However i've not solved the SSL issues since the browser shows that the site is using the traefik.local certificate instead of the real one of final container.
I've read around that i need a transparent/passthrough proxy (or tcp proxy) to accomplish it but i've not found anything that is able to autoconfigure itself such as nginx-proxy. A working example is the following: https://github.com/hpello/tcp-proxy-docker, but doesn't include the nginx-proxy autoconfiguration feature.
I've also found some solution with iptables and redsocks that seems similar to the UCP enterprise docker solution, but, as before, it's not autoconfigured such as nginx-proxy.
I've not found any guide for HAproxy and EnvoyProxy to use automatic transparent proxy / tcp proxy.
So, i would ask you:
Is it possible to create such proxy or am i missing something?
Could someone help me to find a good solution to it?
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-22 at 18:08I've created an opensource project that does everythin I needed on a docker network and also directly on host:
QUESTION
I use a specific monofont for verbatim blocks. In one of my verbatim block, some characters are not included in the font. As suggested in this post, one can use either a different font, or use pmboxdraw package to render the un-supported characters. But it seems that it does not work for me.
The following is a MWE, in which the black circle (i.e., 1st character of the second line) can not be drawn correctly. My intention is that to use the monofont I used for the verbatim block, and use whatever substitute font for the black circle character. Is there a solution for that? Thanks a lot!
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-12 at 12:02You can replace individual symbols with the newunicodechar package. You just need to find a font that contains the character, see e.g. https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/25cf/fontsupport.htm
QUESTION
I want to have two names for the same atom in Prolog:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Aug-31 at 07:57Implementation specific facilities are available for this purpose - and much more. Indeed, given that identity it's 'at heart' of logic, rewriting rules to fit different identification strategies is not an uncommon problem.
In SWI-Prolog, you can use the expansion hooks, more specifically goal_expansion/2.
In your module, add near the end-of-file (just a convention, though)
QUESTION
I am behind a corporate proxy. In order to use Docker Containers from all over the internet without setting http_proxy or https_proxy I am using nclarier/redsocks docker container.
If I use it by running docker run --privileged=true --net=host -d ncarlier/redsocks proxy.domain.com 8080 and then running another container for example docker run -it ubuntu bash and then executing curl google.com inside of the ubuntu container everything is fine.
But if I use the containers with docker-compose the second container has no internet access/does not use the proxy server.
Here is the yaml:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jul-29 at 12:26Well the problem itself had nothing to do with docker-compose, it just surfaced it.
docker-compose creates its own bridge network for the containers it spins up, even if you do not specify it.
The nclarier/redsocks image creates iptable rules in order to route the traffic through its proxy, it does this by specifying an interface - docker0 which happens to be the bridge network.
If you don't specify an interface everything is fine. All traffic, from every network that has access to the internet gets routed through the redsocks proxy.
I've created a PR for the image and hope that this also helps others.
QUESTION
I have this each loop:
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Aug-15 at 15:07This is a way to do it, but I strongly recommend you to move this count logic somewhere else than your view(s)
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install redsocks
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
