ipc | Public domain single header inter process communication | File Utils library
kandi X-RAY | ipc Summary
kandi X-RAY | ipc Summary
Public domain, cross platform, single header inter-process communication primitives. This is a "stb like" public domain header-only C/C++ library that provides inter process communication functionality, released under unlicense. In Linux and similar, link with "-lpthread -lrt". Windows doesn't need anything special. See header for documentation.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ipc
ipc Key Features
ipc Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ipc
QUESTION
Im trying to create a multithreaded namedpipe server as outlined in the msdn sample here https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/ipc/multithreaded-pipe-server but Im trying to restrict the namedpipe to access by adminstrators group members only.
The example works correctly when no SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES structure is specified but when an SA is specified the first call is successful, but following calls to CreateNamedPipe fail as long as the first pipe is listening or communicating with a client. The create call fails, usually with ACCESS_DENIED, but sometimes with error 1305 The revision level is unknown. When the first pipe closes due to client disconnecting the following call will be successful for the next createnamedpipe call but will in turn fail once that pipe has a client.
I have tried multiple values for the grfInheritance field with no avail. This is my first adventure into explicitly specifying SECURITY so forgive me if I have missed something obvious. Note that in the Function that calls createnamedpipe I create a new SA structure with each create attempt but I have also tried creating one and sharing it outside the create loop.
Relevant code follows:
function that creates the pipe:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 02:23According to Named Pipe Security and Access Rights,
In addition to the requested access rights, the DACL must allow the calling thread FILE_CREATE_PIPE_INSTANCE access to the named pipe.
QUESTION
What is the difference between Arrow IPC and Feather?
The official documentation says:
Version 2 (V2), the default version, which is exactly represented as the Arrow IPC file format on disk. V2 files support storing all Arrow data types as well as compression with LZ4 or ZSTD. V2 was first made available in Apache Arrow 0.17.0.
While vaex, a pandas alternative, has two different functions, one for Arrow IPC and one for Feather. polars, another pandas alternative, indicate that Arrow IPC and Feather are the same.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 20:18TL;DR There is no difference between the Arrow IPC file format and Feather V2.
There's some confusion because of the two versions of Feather, and because of the Arrow IPC file format vs the Arrow IPC stream format.
For the two versions of Feather, see the FAQ entry:
What about the “Feather” file format?
The Feather v1 format was a simplified custom container for writing a subset of the Arrow format to disk prior to the development of the Arrow IPC file format. “Feather version 2” is now exactly the Arrow IPC file format and we have retained the “Feather” name and APIs for backwards compatibility.
So IPC == Feather(V2). Some places refer to Feather mean Feather(V1) which is different from the IPC file format. However, that doesn't seem to be the issue here: Polars and Vaex appear to use Feather to mean Feather(V2) (though Vaex slightly misleadingly says "Feather is exactly represented as the Arrow IPC file format on disk, but also support compression").
Vaex exposes both export_arrow
and export_feather
. This relates to another point of Arrow, as it defines both an IPC stream format and an IPC file format. They differ in that the file format has a magic string (for file identification) and a footer (to support random access reads) (documentation).
export_feather
always writes the IPC file format (==FeatherV2), while export_arrow
lets you choose between the IPC file format and the IPC stream format. Looking at where export_feather
was added I think the confusion might stem from the PyArrow APIs making it obvious how to enable compression with the Feather API methods (which are a user-friendly convenience) but not with the IPC file writer (which is what export_arrow
uses). But ultimately, the format being written is the same.
QUESTION
I'm getting used to win32 API shenanigans but it's tiresome, the problem I face this time regards the assignemt of a name of a named pipe, this is what I'm doing:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-07 at 12:03LPTSTR
is the non-const version. You're trying to acquire a non-const pointer to a string literal.
This used to be valid C++ (it still is valid C, hence the sample), but it was very dangerous, so they made illegal in C++11. You either want:
QUESTION
So i have this nodejs that was originaly used as api to crawl data using puppeteer from a website based on a schedule, now to check if there is a schedule i used a function that link to a model query and check if there are any schedule at the moment.
It seems to work and i get the data, but when i was crawling the second article and the next there is always this error UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Error: Request is already handled!
and followed by UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Unhandled promise rejection. This error originated either by throwing inside of an async function without a catch block, or by rejecting a promise which was not handled with .catch().
and it seems to take a lot of resource from the cpu and memory.
So my question is, is there any blocking in my code or anything that could have done better.
this is my server.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-05 at 16:26I figured it out, i just used puppeteer cluster.
QUESTION
I am trying to send an HWND with the WM_COPYDATA IPC method. So far when sending a string LPCTSTR it works.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 20:50An HWND
is not a pointer. You most likely want:
QUESTION
- Electron -
12.0.8
- Platform – macOS
10.15.7
I'm trying to display a file dialog from an Electron renderer process. I thought I could reference the dialog
object in the same way I reference ipcRenderer
through the contextBridge
.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 19:54The issue isn't one of proxying through the contextBridge
, but one of which Electron APIs are available in the renderer process at all. Unfortunately dialog
just isn't one of those (note "Process: Main" on its page), so it can't be referenced directly in the renderer process, even during preload. The old remote
API for using main process modules from the renderer process is still available, but it rightly warns you that
The
remote
module is deprecated. Instead ofremote
, useipcRenderer
andipcMain
.
So yes, your solution in note (2) is the intended one.
QUESTION
I have create an image for the oracle 19c. I have started my container with below command.
docker run --name oracledb -d -p 1527:1521 -p 5700:5500 -e ORACLE_PWD=password1 -e ORACLE_CHARACTERSET=AL32UTF8 -v /d/docker-code/oracle-data oracle/database:19.3.0-ee
After creation of container, I am able to login in the container. I am able to connect with the below command inside the container.
sqlplus system/password1@172.17.0.2:1527/ORCLCDB
Outside of the container, from the cmd, I can not connect to that oracle instance.
Note: I have already installed oracle on the windows machine at port 1521 which is default port.
listener.ora
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 08:33Make sure all container network interfaces are listening for database traffic, hence 0.0.0.0
. Do not hardcode a docker bridge network address (172..) because this address will be assigned at container startup. Just stick with the default port 1521 local to the container. This port - 1521 - is local to the container and not exposed to the host OS. You publish this port to the host OS where you decide which port to use, hence -p 1522:1521
QUESTION
prometheus-prometheus-kube-prometheus-prometheus-0 0/2 Terminating 0 4s alertmanager-prometheus-kube-prometheus-alertmanager-0 0/2 Terminating 0 10s
After updating EKS cluster to 1.16 from 1.15 everything works fine except these two pods, they keep on terminating and unable to initialise. Hence, prometheus monitoring does not work. I am getting below errors while describing the pods.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 08:59If someone needs to know the answer, in my case(the above situation) there were 2 Prometheus operators running in different different namespace, 1 in default & another monitoring namespace. so I removed the one from the default namespace and it resolved my pods crashing issue.
QUESTION
I'm using shared memory with System V IPC. I create segments using keys with the following command:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-25 at 19:31As a follow-up to the comments which shows how to remark shared memory segment for destruction:
QUESTION
AFAIK, there exist two methods for IPC over sockets. Unix sockets and TCP/IP sockets.
UNIX domain sockets know that they’re executing on the same system, so they can avoid some checks and operations (like routing); which makes them faster and lighter than IP sockets. They also transfer the packets over the file system, meaning disk access is a natural part of the process (AFAIU, from what using file system means).
IP sockets (especially TCP/IP sockets) are a mechanism allowing communication between processes over the network. In some cases, you can use TCP/IP sockets to talk with processes running on the same computer (by using the loopback interface).
My question is: in the latter case, where does the transfer of packets occur exactly? If they are being passed over the memory, although it seems like there is a logical overhead, IP sockets are actually more performant than UNIX sockets.
Is there something that I am missing? I understand that logically IP sockets introduce an overhead, I want to understand what happens to a message in both cases.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-24 at 17:35UNIX domain sockets ... They also transfer the packets over the file system, meaning disk access is a natural part of the process
This is wrong. While there is a special socket file in the file system it only regulates access to the socket by using file system permissions for it. The data transfer itself is done purely in memory.
IP sockets ... where does the transfer of packets occur exactly?
Also in memory.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ipc
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page