crc16 | command line crc16 calculator | Apps library
kandi X-RAY | crc16 Summary
kandi X-RAY | crc16 Summary
command line crc16 calculator.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of crc16
crc16 Key Features
crc16 Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on crc16
QUESTION
I have a program that computes the CRC of characters using the CRC-16. The program is given below.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 21:38The code just needs to declare buf[11] so there's room to append the CRC, then append the CRC. Some other were changes made to work with Visual Studio (the indented blocks used for local variables). The CRC calculation could be simplified.
QUESTION
I'm trying to read the values of an industry digital counter with Modbus RTU RS-485. Using USB-RS-485 conversion, and here is the master send code is taken from the following datasheet,
I am expecting that the read input register is what I'm expecting, and the API of the minimalmodbus expects to specify register number, a number of decimals, and function code.
- Does the library auto-assign the slave number, or we have to define it?
- From the datasheet, is it the register number is the address?
- And how many decimals do I expect if there's two data sequence as a response?
- Is the CRC16 check already included within the library as i shouldn't code it?
Here's my code by far, modifying examples.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-10 at 05:34Does the library auto-assign the slave number, or we have to define it?
With MinimalModbus you pass the slave ID through in the minimalmodbus.Instrument('/dev/ttyUSB0', 1)
call (the 1 is the Slave ID). How you set the slave ID on the device itself varies (this is not covered by the Modbus over serial line spec; could be a configuration program, DIP switches, based on the serial number etc. Other libraries may take different approaches (for example defaulting to Slave ID 1).
From the datasheet, is it the register number is the address?
The header in the spec tables says "No(Address)" so "10001(0000)" means register 1, address 0 (these refer to the same thing; I recommend reading the "Modbus: When 40001 Really Means 1, or 0 Really Means 1" section in this article which explains some of the issues around addressing).
And how many decimals do I expect if there's two data sequence as a response?
Not quite sure what you mean by "two data sequence". The Modbus spec only details the sending of bits (coils) and 16 bit values (input/holding registers). From a quick look at your spec it looks like this device just uses a single registers; for instance "OUT1 Output time" has "unit: ×10㎳" so take whatever is in the register and divide by 10 to get ms.
Is the CRC16 check already included within the library as i shouldn't code it?
Any decent Modbus library will look after the protocol details (such as CRC) for you (so no you don't need to code this; MinimalModbus will calculate it for you)
QUESTION
Although I am following the method to calculate Check Sum CRC16. I'm cant get the result as user manual show. Can anyone help on this?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-24 at 14:08Just initialize crc result to 0xFFFF not zero as I expect. such:
QUESTION
I am currently using the CRC-16 algorithm posted in:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-21 at 01:40What you describe, and what your desired result corresponds to, is CRC-16/UMTS. The description from Greg Cook's catalog is:
QUESTION
I am trying to convert some C++ function to use in my python script and stumbled upon this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-26 at 09:12It's not standard C or C++(a) but, given the context (CRC16 and the variable names), it almost certainly takes two 8-bit bytes and forms a 16-bit word.
(a) Hence it's probably defined somewhere in the libraries or source code you have available to you.
QUESTION
I want to do a Python implementation (actually MicroPython) of a specific checksum calculation based on CRC16-CCITT. It will be used on a microcontroller to check data integrity over a serial connection.
The algorithm is available as C implementation.
The checksum is a 16 bit, type CCITT. The checksum starts at the first byte of the message. Sample code to calculate the CRC16 CCITT in the C language:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-15 at 20:55The CRC implemented in the provided Python code is not the CCITT CRC-16. It is referred to interestingly as a false CCITT CRC-16 in this catalog. The CRC implemented in the provided C code is in fact the CCITT CRC-16.
The Python code is easily modified to reflect the correct definition:
QUESTION
I would like some help as I seem to be unable to calculate the CRC for a single byte, let alone an array of bytes.
Below is the test code that I have been trying to get work. Please note that I used the code from this post, and the example with the array of chars works, but I need to be able to adapt this to work for an array of uint8_t
.
When going through the fundamentals of CRC, this seems like it should work but I may be mistaken.
I have been trying to validate the function by checking the outputted remainder (crc) using this site.
If someone could kindly identify where the issue is coming round which is leading to the wrong CRC value being calculated, and educate me as to why this is happening, that would be highly appreciated!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-22 at 19:07If you do this:
QUESTION
I'm trying to implement my own cyclic redundancy check (CRC) in Python. The layout of my program is as follows:
- random_message(n) generates a random byte message of length n.
- Generate the checksum value using the CRC code
crc16
. - Run the corruption code
corrupt_data
on the generated message. - Check whether the checksum is different or not (I did this using
==
). - Repeat steps 1 to 4 many times to see how often an error (i.e., the corruption) goes unnoticed.
I am confident that the methods crc16
and corrupt_data
are correct, so I don't think there's much reason to analyse them too closely. I think the problems start with my use of byte strings in the second half of my program, after those two methods.
My code is as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-20 at 07:01Your issue is not with the byte strings really, it's a logical error. You're trying to corrupt the wrong thing. You don't want to corrupt the checksum, you want to corrupt the original message and then take a checksum of the corrupted version. Then you can compare if the two checksums match or not.
Try:
QUESTION
I have an incoming packet that reads 7E0302403F387E from a serial port.
start and end flag is 7E, FCS/CRC is 3F38 and the data is 030240. The FCS is calculated per the algorithm specified in RFC 1662. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1662#appendix-A
This is the code I'm using to generate the FCS for 030240:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-14 at 22:05Based on the linked appendix, the initial value of the CRC is 0xffff
, not 0, and you need to exclusive-or the result with 0xffff
to get the FCS to put in the packet.
However that still doesn't work for your example packet. I can only guess that your example packet was not correctly extracted or identified.
Update:
From the OP comment below and some deduction, the actual data in the message is "~\x00\x03\x00\x02\x04\x00\x9b\x38~"
. The OP left out three zero bytes for some reason, and the OP printed it in a way that obscured one byte as a question mark.
Now the CRC calculates correctly as 0x389b
, stored in the message little-endian as 0x9b
0x38
. To get that, you must apply my comments above on the initial value and final exclusive-or.
QUESTION
Here is my code for the implementation of a CRC in python:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-10 at 04:06There are many CRC-16's. I count 30 here alone, and I'm sure there are more in use that are not in that catalog.
The one you have implemented is the CRC-16/UMTS in that catalog, also known as CRC-16/BUYPASS and CRC-16/VERIFONE. It is the most straightforward of definitions, with the bits in and bits out not reflected, with an initial value of zero, and with no final exclusive-or.
The result CRC you implemented on the message 34 ec
can in fact be found directly in your linked "correct result", on the fourth row of the table which is labeled "CRC-16/BUYPASS".
If you want to implement a different CRC-16, the first thing you need to do is specify which one. That specification is the polynomial, reflection of input and output, initial value, and final exclusive-or value.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install crc16
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page