pocl | pocl - Portable Computing Language | GPU library
kandi X-RAY | pocl Summary
kandi X-RAY | pocl Summary
pocl is being developed towards an efficient implementation of OpenCL standard which can be easily adapted for new targets. Please refer to the file INSTALL in this directory for building and installing pocl. More documentation available at The main web page is at
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of pocl
pocl Key Features
pocl Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on pocl
QUESTION
The implementation of emulated atomics in openCL following the STREAM blog works nicely for atomic add in 32bit, on CPU as well as NVIDIA and AMD GPUs.
The 64bit equivalent based on the cl_khr_int64_base_atomics
extension seems to run properly on (pocl and intel) CPU as well as NVIDIA openCL drivers.
I fail to make 64bit work on AMD GPU cards though -- both on amdgpu-pro and rocm (3.5.0) environments, running on a Radeon VII and a Radeon Instinct MI50, respectively.
The implementation goes as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-22 at 11:41For 64-bit, the function is called atom_cmpxchg
and not atomic_cmpxchg
.
QUESTION
I'm working on a project and I've got some problems with this OpenCL kernel :-(
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-07 at 03:22All the operations inside the loop do not have side effects, you only read from those __global
pointers, and you calculate some temporary values that in the end get accumulated into aa
through that final aa += ...
. In other words, the sole purpose of that loop is to calculate the value of aa
.
Therefore, if you remove aa
from the last line (outside the loop), all the operations inside the loop are completely useless, and you end up with a loop that does nothing except reading some values and updating local variables that will get discarded at function return. Compiling the above code with optimizations enabled (which I assume you are doing, otherwise your question wouldn't make much sense), the compiler is very likely to just get rid of the entire loop. Hence, the code without that final aa
runs a lot faster.
Here's a GCC example (adapted removing CUDA annotations), where you can see that even the lowest level of optimization (-O1
) removes the entire body of the loop, leaving only comparisons and the incrementing of i
. With -O2
, the whole loop is removed.
QUESTION
I'm trying to compile a Fortran subroutine in the remote machine, when I run:
R CMD SHLIB -fPIC vintp2p_afterburner_wind.f
I get the following error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-01 at 12:37Maybe someone will find it useful: compiling is done by :
gfortran -fPIC -shared -ffree-form vintp2p_afterburner_wind.f -o vintp2p_afterburner_wind.so
QUESTION
I want to develop an OpenCL based application with host code in C, using Ubuntu.
But the development packages overwhelm me:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-28 at 20:57You don't need any of them. See this answer.
QUESTION
General Overview of Program: The majority of the code here creates the FrameProcessor object. This object is initialized with some data shape, generally 2048xN, and can then be called to process the data using a series of kernels (proc_frame). For each vector of length 2048 the program will:
- Apply a Hanning window (elementwise multiplication 2048*2048)
- Do a linear interpolation to remap values (to map to linear-in-wavenumber space from non-linear spectrometer bins which signal is derived from--not too important of a detail but I figured it would be good to include in case it was unclear)
- Apply an FFT
Problem: I want to go faster! The code below is not performing poorly, but for this project I need it to be as fast as it can possibly be. However, I am unsure on how I might make further improvements to this code. So, I'm looking for suggestions on relevant reading, alternate libraries which I should use, changes to code structure, etc.
Current Performance: On my rig with a GeForce RTX 2080 the benchmarks I get (with n=60, which seems to give best performance) are:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-17 at 01:42Copying my reply in the Reikna group for reference.
- Create a reikna Thread object from whatever pyopencl queue you want it to use (probably the one associated with the arrays you want to pass to FFT)
- Create an FFT computation based on this Thread
- Pass your pyopencl arrays to it without any conversion. (you can create a reikna array based on the buffer from a pyopencl array, by passing it as
base_data
keyword, but if using FFT is all you need, that is not necessary).Reikna threads are wrappers on top of pyopencl context + queue, and reikna arrays are subclasses of pyopencl arrays, so the interop should be pretty simple.
Applying this (in a quick and dirty way, feel free to improve), I get: https://gist.github.com/fjarri/f781d3695b7c6678856110cced95be40 . Basically, the changes are:
- creating a
Thread
out of the existingqueue
(self.thr = self.api.Thread(self.queue)
) - using the PyOpenCL buffer in FFT without copying it to CPU.
The results I get:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install pocl
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page