pdf-tools | Emacs support library for PDF files | Code Editor library
kandi X-RAY | pdf-tools Summary
kandi X-RAY | pdf-tools Summary
Emacs support library for PDF files.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of pdf-tools
pdf-tools Key Features
pdf-tools Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on pdf-tools
QUESTION
Goal: to run this Auto Labelling Notebook on AWS SageMaker Jupyter Labs.
Kernels tried: conda_pytorch_p36
, conda_python3
, conda_amazonei_mxnet_p27
.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-03 at 09:29I would recommend to downgrade your milvus version to a version before the 2.0 release just a week ago. Here is a discussion on that topic: https://github.com/deepset-ai/haystack/issues/2081
QUESTION
I wanted to import fitz in my code. To do that, I tried installing PyMuPDF using
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-05 at 13:16Assuming you are using M1 Mac, you can solve this problem installing mupdf
, swig
, freetype
and latest version of PyMuPDF:
QUESTION
I'm trying to generate proper and conformant PDF/A, based on normal PDF documents, and after spend some hours in investigation, we've decided to make use of Ghostscript capabilities. This bussiness requirement has been set for a bigger C# project I'm working in, but first of all I started some testing with Ghostscript commands over Windows context on the one hand, and created an isolated console application that uses Ghostscript .NET on the other, to test viability of this feature.
We concentrated efforts in PFD/A-1B format for this first test, and make use of VeraPDF and PDF-Tools to check conformance for generated files.
The following tests have been completed with a few different PDF files, some of them were files actually generated by our project application. For simplicity, and in case anyone wants to check, I provide a simple PDF (with only a few lines of text) which has been used and tested in same way and that reproduces same behavior.
Ghostscript command testing ExecutionUsing GhostScript v 9.52, I tried the following command:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-14 at 15:07You should not use -dNOSAFER
, you should instead add files/directories to the permitted file reading list using the --permit-file-read switch. The file which needs to be read is the OutputIntent profile which is one of the main ingredients of the pdfa_def.ps file. See below.
If you do not include the pdfa_def.ps file then you will not get an OutputIntent in the final PDF/A file and it will not be PDF/A compliant (unless you specify UseDeviceIndependentColor as the ColorConversionStrategy
). That's why your code example doesn't work. Noticing that PDF-Tools still says the file is valid, I would stop using that as a validator, it clearly isn't reliable. I've found VeraPDF to be the best validator personally (it's better than the Acrobat built-in verification).
I'm surprised that the command line you have shown at the top of the question produces a valid PDF/A file, unless you have modified the pdfa_def.ps file? You are supposed to and in particular you must modify the value associated with the /ICCProfile
key. That value (a string inside parentheses) needs to be a fully qualified path to the ICC profile and either the ICC profile file or the directory it resides in needs to be added to the permitted list of files to read see the documentation here under -dSAFER
.
Assuming you have done so, then the resulting PDF file should be a PDF/A-1b conformant file. And indeed according to your question, VeraPDF says it is conformant so I'm unclear on what your problem is there. It would be much more useful to share the input and output PDF files rather than a picture of (part of) the Acrobat display.
So to answer your questions:
Yes there is a way to generate a PDF/A file with ICC information (it isn't valid if it doesn't have an OutputIntent) and your command line does so. If you have not modified the pdfa_def.ps file appropriately you may still have a problem.
As far as I know you run the pdfa_def.ps file using Ghostscript.NET in exactly the same way as you do on the command line, you just put it in the list of arguments. So you just need to uncomment the line you've commented. Of course, you haven't included -dNOSAFER, nor added the ICC profile to the list of permitted files to read, so you will get an error. I am surprised you are getting a fatal error though, I'd expect an invalidaccess, but the obvious thing to do is to add -dNOSAFER to the arguments. The back channel output might be useful, it may have more information, and you haven't included that.
Oh, and I would not write to a pipe either. The pdfwrite device expects to be writing to a file and it may try to seek within the file while writing it. If it does and you've written to a pipe (or other non-seekable output), then it's going to fail.
You don't need to add -f to the argument list, and this:
QUESTION
I have the following code, which counts the number of PDFs in specific folders, and counts the number of sheets in those specific PDFs, and sends an email with this data.
I've anonymised part of the script.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-08 at 12:18It's a HTML encoding issue. I think you need to either use the following code.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install pdf-tools
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page