CPP-Programming | Various C/C examples | GPU library
kandi X-RAY | CPP-Programming Summary
kandi X-RAY | CPP-Programming Summary
Various C/C++ examples. DirectX, OpenGL, CUDA, Vulkan, OpenCL.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of CPP-Programming
CPP-Programming Key Features
CPP-Programming Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on CPP-Programming
QUESTION
Following a tutorial on learncpp.com which discusses declaring member variables outside of constructors. However in previous lessons the author mentions that minimizing the amount of constructors is optimal and can be done by using default values in the parameters of a constructor. This is confusing to me because suddenly there are two places to give default values, directly where you define your member variable, and in the parameter of the constructor. Additionally, it seemed like the whole point of defining default values outside of the constructor was to prevent redundant code because "if you update the default value for a member, you need to touch each constructor".
Here's the example used:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-30 at 16:06You can rewrite your constructors to not have any default parameters by adding some constructors
QUESTION
I was reading Chapter 8 of the "Modern C++ Programming Cookbook, 2nd edition" on concurrency and stumbled upon something that puzzles me.
The author implements different versions of parallel map and reduce functions using std::thread
and std::async
. The implementations are really close; for example, the heart of the parallel_map
functions are
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-08 at 10:25My original interpretation was incorrect. Refer to @OznOg's answer below.
Modified Answer:
I created a simple benchmark that uses std::async
and std::thread
to do some tiny tasks:
QUESTION
I'm trying to make a program that moves a file (like file.txt
) specified by the user to a directory that he also specifies. I tried using the move()
function, however I don't quite understand it yet, so I tried with the rename()
function and used this site's code as help.
I've worked with the rename()
function and moved a file like this:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-09 at 19:16First off, don't double up on the slashes when typing them in at the command prompt at runtime, if that is what you are doing. Escaping slashes only applies to string literals in code, not runtime data.
That said, you are not allocating enough memory to hold the user's input. When initialized with " "
, your oldDir[]
and newDir[]
arrays are each only 2 char
s in size. When you drop the " "
, the compiler no longer knows how large to make the array, since you are not telling it which size to use.
You need to handle the arrays more like this instead:
QUESTION
I have these 2 files and I need to update the file by updating into the temp file. I did it but how do I rename the temp file to the old file and then delete the old file?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-15 at 04:26What this is telling you:
QUESTION
https://www.programiz.com/cpp-programming/structure-function
I'm learning how to pass structures to functions using the website above, I spent 2 hours of trying to figure out what was wrong with my program, I decided to copy and paste the code on the website to see if they did it correctly and the same error came up. If anyone could help it would be appreciated, there code below.
Warning C6001 Using uninitialized memory 'p'. Structure-Function C:\DEV\C++\Structure-Function\Structure-Function\main.cpp 18
Error C4700 uninitialized local variable 'p' used Structure-Function C:\DEV\C++\Structure-Function\Structure-Function\main.cpp 18
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-30 at 00:16If you just want to make the compiler happy and avoid the warning, initialize p
before doing anything with it:
QUESTION
I was reading up on C++, and the site says that if you initialize an int array with less values then declared as such
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-21 at 18:30The site is horribly wrong!
(in this point, I don't know the rest, but one has to say it clear ;)
Their example:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-05 at 14:54Try explicitly binding your function arguments:
QUESTION
While reading a tutorial about virtual functions(not relavant for this example) on this link, I found this code.
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Nov-06 at 09:45The this
is implicitly given, and it is often a matter of style whether to write it explicitly or not. In your case I'd say that it does not improve readability.
In other cases, however, it makes sense or is even necessary to explicitly write this
in order to avoid naming conflicts between local variables and data members. Consider, for example, the following program:
QUESTION
Question
I do not want to pass the size of the array as an index parameter.
For my merge_sort
, I want to optimize my parameters using the iterator range concept. I can't seem to figure out how to deference the iterator range and access my array. I can deference to access the indices like low
and high
in recursive_merge_sort
, but there does not seem to be an intuitive way to access the array itself. I've been using this great guide on C++ Pointers and Arrays as a starting point.
My Merge Sort C++11 C++17 question brought this concept to light and I like the idea of using iterator ranges to reduce the number of parameters for my sort.
Code
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Apr-30 at 22:07Iterators are modeled to act like pointers. They have the same type of overloaded operators: dereferencing and increment at the very least (some also have decrement, random access, etc.).
The most advanced iterator interface is random access, which functions exactly like a raw pointer (by design).
So all (raw) pointers are basically random access iterators into a C-style (contiguous) array. Look at the following to visualize begin/end iterators for a C-style array:
QUESTION
I am very new into assembly and this is a basic question.
I have just heard about the concept of using zero bytes of RAM.
I have compiled a C++ code via
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Apr-13 at 01:34Variables are not the only thing that main memory stores. In fact, when you run a program, your operating system reserves some space (called address space) for the process in charge of running your executable file.
The assembly code generated by the compilation is stored in a section (the .text
section), the data in (you don't say) the .data
section, static variables initialized to 0
in the .bss
section and so on. Strings, for example, are usually stored in read-only sections (.rodata
).
So the answer is no, every program, when running, has to use memory.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install CPP-Programming
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page