PortForward | minimal port forwarding utility that uses Epoll | TCP library

In one of our customer's kubernetes cluster(v1.16.8 with kubeadm) RBAC does not work at all. We creating a ServiceAccount, read-only ClusterRole and ClusterRoleBinding with the following yamls but when we login trough dashboard or kubectl user can almost do anything in the cluster. What can cause this problem?

I run a bunch of alt/bot accounts on my server and I'm trying to make a command that gets all the (online)players IP addresses and if it matches mine, then it adds them to a player list to print to whoever executed the command. Here's what I have so far.

I am trying to set up a program where the server can communicate with multiple clients. The program is written in Java. I got it all working on the same machine so I decided to try LAN. I converted the program to JAR files and I tried connecting my laptop to my PC (both are on the same network). The connection is successful but unfortunately only 1 message arrives to the server. As you can see in the code below, I send multiple messages (Meaning that i write multiple times) via DataOutputStream. One defines the datatype (in the following example 0 means that it's a String) and the other sends the actual message data. I also print the size of the packets in bytes and it always matches the size of the DataOutputStream instance.

How can I make Skaffold forward privileged/protected/special ports which have numbers below 1024? In my skaffold.yaml I added:

Following the documentation I try to setup the Seldon-Core quick-start https://docs.seldon.io/projects/seldon-core/en/v1.11.1/workflow/github-readme.html

I don't have LoadBalancer so I would like to use port-fowarding for accessing to the service.

I run the following script for setup the system:

We have two GKE private clusters, where access is only possible via ssh proxy.

In the local environment this works this way:

1. Open a ssh connection with port 8888 forwarding to the bastion host
   gcloud compute ssh dev-cluster-bastion --project client-dev --zone xxxx -- -L 8888:127.0.0.1:8888

2. In another session
   HTTPS_PROXY=localhost:8888 kubectl get pods

This returns the list of the running pods.

When we do this inside a bitbucket pipeline, then the ssh connects, but then closes and the kubectl call fails. The message from the ssh connection is:

Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal

So the portforwarding is closed too.

Adding -fN to the ssh start does not help, the port forwarding is not working.

gcloud compute ssh dev-cluster-bastion --project client-dev --zone xxxx -- -fN -L 8888:127.0.0.1:8888

ssh then tells me client_loop: send disconnect: Connection reset by peer

Any ideas how to open the port 8888 tcp tunnel inside a bitbucket pipeline, so we can send the kubectl commands to the cluster?

is there a way to create a topic permission for a user with the cli tool rabbitmqadmin on a remote system?

Using the Bitnami Helm Chart https://github.com/bitnami/charts/tree/master/bitnami/rabbitmq

Will use it for scripting so the Web UI is not an option Found there is Method for the other CLI Tool rabbitmqctl can not connect via rabbitmqctl to my cluster even I have a kubernetes Service + Portforwarding for port 4369

I already created a User + host permissions via rabbitmqadmin So the rabbitmqadmin cli tool itself is working in general

I'm trying to understand why this particular socat command isn't working in my case where I run it in a IPv6 only Kubernetes cluster.

Cluster is build on top of AWS with Calico CNI & containerd. Provisioned using kubeadm and Kubernetes 1.21.

I have run the following socat command which binds to loopback interface ::1,

I have following network situation: Router 192.168.1.1 (portforwarding 80 to 192.168.1.20 Raspberry) Raspberry 192.168.1.20 with nginx running. Synology NAS 192.168.1.10 with "synology drive" service running.

On the Raspberry 192.168.1.20 nginx conf file I have a redirection for the subfolder /drive. Because I want to redirect to the Synology NAS to be able to use the "synology drive" service.

Therefore I've created following entry on the Raspberry nginx server in the conf file: