Fog-of-war | briefly describe how it work here : Draw the field of view | Graphics library

 by   LeLocTai C# Version: Current License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | Fog-of-war Summary

kandi X-RAY | Fog-of-war Summary

Fog-of-war is a C# library typically used in User Interface, Graphics, Unity, WebGL applications. Fog-of-war has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

I don't have time to comment the code, so I will briefly describe how it work here: Draw the field of view as a mesh (thanks /u/SebastianLague for the great tutorial), make sure it cover obstacle as well. Use a camera that only sees those mesh to draw to a small RenderTexture. Use a replacement shader to make sure the fields of view are alway opaque, even though they're transparent in the Scene view Upscale that Render Texture with anti-aliasing and bilinear filtering, blur it slightly, then project it to the scene by a projector placed at exactly the same place as the camera. The projector use a custom shader to ignore any color from the RT, only use its alpha channel (there a dedicated field for color). It also blends the RT from the previous frame in to smooth out the transition.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              Fog-of-war has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 66 star(s) with 14 fork(s). There are 7 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              Fog-of-war has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of Fog-of-war is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              Fog-of-war has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              Fog-of-war has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              Fog-of-war is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              Fog-of-war releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Fog-of-war
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            Fog-of-war Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for Fog-of-war.

            Fog-of-war Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for Fog-of-war.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Algorithm for creating a list of rectangles from a list of squares?
            Asked 2021-Apr-09 at 20:44

            I'm trying to implement line-of-sight visibility / fog-of-war for my 2D top-down game, and found this article which has a simple and efficient algorithm which involves shooting rays at the edges of rectangles to calculate a list of triangles to brighten.

            However, my game uses tiles, so it would be very inefficient to run this against the 150x150 (22,500) tiles surrounding the players every frame. Rather, it would be better to instead convert the tile-map to a list of rectangles and then run the line-of-sight algorithm against that. For example, if this were my tile-map (where 1 is a solid tile and 0 is a free tile):

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-09 at 20:44

            There is naive way, for example, start top left in a width-first filling process, that would give you similar results to what you're looking for.

            Here's what the width-first algo might look like:

            Results in:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67026721

            QUESTION

            Error when using Metal Indirect Command Buffer: "Fragment shader cannot be used with indirect command buffers"
            Asked 2019-Apr-02 at 14:56

            I’m working on a Metal, MTKView based app that takes advantage of the A11 TBDR architecture to do deferred shading in a single render pass. I used Apple’s Deferred Lighting sample code as reference, and it works great.

            I’d like to try changing the geometry buffer pass to be GPU-driven, using the Indirect Command Buffer feature of Metal 2 on A11 hardware.

            I’ve been using Apple’s Encoding Indirect Command Buffers on the GPU sample code as my main point of reference for this. I’m able to run this sample on my iPhone XR (although, probably off-topic, the scrolling is not smooth, it judders).

            I’m running into difficulties however with my own code, when I try to move my geometry buffer pass into an indirect command buffer. When I set supportIndirectCommandBuffers to true on the MTLRenderPipelineDescriptor of the Geometry Buffer pipeline, device.makeRenderPipelineState fails with the error

            AGXMetalA12 Code=3 "Fragment shader cannot be used with indirect command buffers"

            I’ve not been able to find any information in the documentation on this error. I’m wondering, are there certain kinds of fragment operation that are not allowed in indirect pipelines, or some kind of limit to GPU-driven drawing that I've overlooked (the number of color attachments perhaps)?

            SharedTypes.h

            Header shared by Metal and Swift

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Apr-02 at 14:56

            Looking through the code and through Metal documentation and Metal Shading Language specification, I think I know why you get this error.

            If you look through render_command interface that is present in metal_command_buffer header in Metal, you'll find that to pass parameters to indirect render commands, you only have these functions: set_vertex_buffer and set_fragment_buffer, there is no set_vertex_texture or set_vertex_sampler like you have in MTLRenderCommandEncoder.

            But, since your pipeline uses shader that in turn uses textures as arguments and you indicate by using supportIndirectCommandBuffers that you would like to use this pipeline in indirect commands, Metal has no choice but to fail pipeline creation.

            Instead if you want to pass textures or samplers to indirect render commands, you should use argument buffers, that you will pass to the shader that issues indirect render commands, which in turn will bind them using set_vertex_buffer and set_fragment_buffer for each render_command.

            Specification: Metal Shading Language Specification (Section 5.16)

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55450380

            QUESTION

            MATLAB 2014b getframe causes UI to 'blank'
            Asked 2018-Sep-20 at 10:41

            I am currently developing a complex MATLAB application. I am trying to save figures (created within its UI) by using the getframe function. This works fine, and saves the figure as intended. However, the UI 'blanks' after every use. The window remains but becomes a uniform white rectangle. Mousing over features in the UI makes them appear again (like a fog-of-war). Adding a refresh statement did not help.

            Why does this happen? How do i make it stop?

            Irritatingly this doesn't happen in 2018a, but the code is in 2014b, which is problematic (something I discovered after being pleased at my cool fix :( ).

            Unfortunately posting code is not feasible because I do not have permission to share it.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Sep-20 at 10:41

            OK after much research I've been unable to find a direct solution. But I have implemented an indirect solution.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52407772

            QUESTION

            Unity3D - 2D static fog of war for line of sight implementation
            Asked 2017-Jun-07 at 15:45

            Unity beginner here!

            So I'm trying to get some static-fog-of-war/line-of-sight for my game.

            Currently I have 2 cameras:

            • The first one renders the scene.
            • The second one has black background and a white polygon which represents the line of sight.

            The 1st camera renders first, so far everything works. (layers are set properly so that the second camera has only the line of sight polygon)

            Then I wan't to do some post processing on the second camera by setting all white pixels of that camera to transparent but this is where I'm lost.

            Using that code to apply the shader:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Jun-07 at 15:45

            You should use a shader for this instead. OnRenderImage requires piping the data back to the CPU and processing it linearly there (slow!!!1) rather than in parallel on the GPU.

            This will take a little bit of research to do properly, but the concept is pretty straight forward. You need to use the stencil mask to get the desired effect. The "white polygon" you have writes data (literally setting a bit to 1 instead of 0) to the stencil mask and then the rest of the scene gets rendered, but only where the stencil mask is a 1.

            Basically think of the line of sight polygon as telling the camera where it's allowed to draw other things. Which is what a mask is. The stencil mask is just a specific grouping of bits that are available during rendering that aren't data that gets drawn to the screen, but rather persist across rendering passes. So:

            Pass 1: draw the LOS object to the mask buffer.
            Pass 2: render the scene only where the buffer has been modified.

            I wrote up an outline shader that uses the stencil mask, which you could use as an example and get started. Mind, that shader was writen to apply only to a single object (and "creates" new geometry), but the same process should still work for doing what you're attempting (I just haven't tried to do it myself).

            Looks like this thread has a (partial) shader that has the effect you're looking for.

            I created two shaders of the standard affair and modified as follows: Hidden Shader: Just under the auto generated shader line "LOD 200", add:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44415469

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install Fog-of-war

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/LeLocTai/Fog-of-war.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone LeLocTai/Fog-of-war

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:LeLocTai/Fog-of-war.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link