PnP | Office 365 Developer Patterns and Practices | Content Management System library

Maybe you've lost this import. import "@pnp/sp/batching";

https://docs.microsoft.com/es-es/sharepoint/dev/spfx/web-parts/guidance/use-sp-pnp-js-with-spfx-web-parts

Alright, seems like I've solved this issue 🙌

I'm still not sure what exactly happens with .pnp.loader.mjs and what it does exactly. I also don't know why the package @graphql-codegen/cli forces the PnP Loader to install but it seems that it somehow can't deal with workspaces. I simply had to add @types/node to the dependencies in the scripts package by

There is no need to allocate memory for this task: pass a pointer to a local array along with its size and use strlcat properly:

Yes, the debugger evaluates all those properties. And while doing so, he encountered an exception. The text (which is not fully visible on your screen shot) will give an indication as to why the exception was thrown. A typical cause is that the object is not valid any more (it's been disposed, for instance). Some properties might also throw an exception because they cannot be evaluated by the debugger for technical reasons. This may for instance happen when looking at instances of System.Type with the debugger.

For this very reason, it is advised that properties are lightweight and should not throw exceptions. Complex operations that involve e.g. accessing a database or querying some piece of hardware information should not be done trough properties. But not all APIs actually adhere to this recommendation.

There are even cases when the debugger may cause side effects due to its property evaluation, therefore a get property should never change the state of an object. Code that would use the following property would work differently when being debugged as when not:

Here's a way to do the same thing with the ancient, arcane, but simple "Black Arts" method known as a CROSSTAB. Notice how you do NOT neet explicit ISNULL()s.

As per comments, it turns out that another ignore rule was overriding the desired un-ignore rule. The key diagnostic was to use:

Resolved.

The issue was that history package was upgraded to v.5.x. At the same time react-router is set to v.^5.2.1. So, the history v.5 is incompatible with react-router v.5.

Looks like history v.5.x is intended for coming react-router v.6.

Downgrading history to v.4 resolved the issue.

Note: the issue has nothing to do with switching to yarn Plug'n'Play.

Your using a "wild mix" in your find() and this will not lead to the element you are expected to find, thats why you get a None

Use the css selector to chain the parts you are looking for, in this case it will pick the in front of commits and its next element that contains the :

What the code from this macro does is take the table with header line you passed to it (p0105 in your case), search through it, and when it finds an entry, it: