lively | source software that allows users | Dektop Application library
kandi X-RAY | lively Summary
kandi X-RAY | lively Summary
Lively is the only animated desktop wallpaper application that you will need. Its super easy.. barely an inconvenience, just drag & drop the files or webpages to set as wallpaper.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of lively
lively Key Features
lively Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on lively
QUESTION
How do I get the value of custom attributes using react hooks?
Here is sample code in code sandbox : demo live
code
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 16:43In your example target
is the and you would need to traverse to the selected option and get the attribute value.
It really doesn't seem practical to store data in a custom option attribute when you could use a hashmap with values as keys
const Example = () => {
const [desc, setDesc] = React.useState('')
const descriptions = {
volvo:'hahahahaa',
saab:'hehehehehe',
opel:'hoooooooo'
}
const handleChange = (e)=>{
const val = e.target.value,
des = descriptions[val]
console.clear()
console.log("value",val);
console.log("description", des);
setDesc(des)
}
return (
Description: {desc}
Volvo
Saab
Opel
);
};
// Render it
ReactDOM.render(
,
document.getElementById("react")
);
QUESTION
The question may sound pretty primitive, but it has spawned as the result of a (lively) discussion about the (best case) complexity of removing an element from a List (at the end).
Here are some points I have considered before posting this question:
- Complexity of removing an element at the end of a
List<>
is O(1) - Complexity of removing any element (be it even the last one) from a static array is O(n), as it requires a new array.
Now keeping in view the above two arguments and the fact that we have an array in the background of List<>
implementation as well.
So why does the List<>
operation lead to O(1) and the same for the array into O(n) when both are involving the recreation of an array? Or am I missing something here? Thanks!
UPDATE: Just to clarify, this question's major focus is not on why the last element removal's complexity is O(1), but rather on why it's O(n) for array vs. O(1) for List<>
. The title has been updated to reflect the changes. Thanks to the answer (which addresses it) and other comments..`
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-07 at 17:01It is common in implementing list-like data structures, to allocate the underlying memory (in C-ish languages an array) sized to contain many list elements and then just to keep track of the last entry. When more space is needed the allocation is usually increased by about 50% at a time.
The starting size and growth policy is obviously up to the implementer (and sometimes tune-able by developers using the type).
This explains why it is far more expensive to add and remove elements elsewhere in the list (the array elements need to be shuffled up and down) and appending to or removing from the end is a "corner case".
A word on time complexity: the average for insertion/deletion is going to be a function of n/2, but the strict definition is worst-case, hence strictly O(n) with no special consideration for special cases.
QUESTION
I have an application where I have a form. In this form, I need to wait for the user to not have inputted anything for 200ms before validating. I am doing that with a promise, but now there are other ways for the "wait 200ms and then validate" promise to be triggered (for example, setting your focus on the field also triggers validation after 200ms - the idea is that if you don't start typing in the first 200ms, the field will show you the errors for the empty input).
The problem with that is that, when React batches requests, useEffect is called only on the last value and I use useEffect to cleanup the promises (which are wrapped timeouts with cancellation provided by Bluebird).
Here is example code which shows my problem, but instead does it with buttons: https://codesandbox.io/s/lively-flower-3w3lc?file=/src/App.js.
Here, if I have one button, it works as expected - it only logs "Hey" once I've stopped clicking. However, it doesn't work with two buttons. How can I make it work? Is there a way to stop just these requests from batching, if that's needed?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-29 at 22:12You could use ref as shown below. Invoking seState
to cache reference to the timeout will trigger re-render, which I believe is not intended here.
QUESTION
After compiling I receive this error message:
Failed to compile src\App.js Line 4:1: 'state' is not defined no-undef
Code App.js:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-14 at 04:42Functional components don't have a defined this
, and any state should be declared in a useState
hook.
Use the useState
hook and set initial state.
QUESTION
The task is to implement a recorder based on the standard web audio api. Having carefully studied both ways ScriptProcessorNode.onaudioprocess & AudioWorkletProcessor.process did not come to a final decision. It is officially said that onaudioprocess has been deprecated since 2014 and a full replacement is audio workers. I'm new to javascript and maybe the question sounds stupid, but why is there an active use of onaudioprocess to this day?
Let's dive into the details. AudioWorkletProcessor api is available for 73% of users, while onaudioprocess api for 93%. In the next 2 years, we can hope for a 10 percent increase. (safari users). There are many projects, articles, solutions using onaudioprocess. Even specific tasks can be solved simply by using onaudioprocess. Such solutions are not possible for AudioWorklet. AudioWorklet documentation is poor and few mentions on the internet. For example, I still don't understand why a WebWorker knows what a blob is, but AudioWorklet doesn't (devTools exception: Uncaught ReferenceError: Blob is not defined). In the typescript, there are long-open cases for declaration types of basic functionality. All this creates the impression that onaudioprocess is more lively than AudioWorklet. Perhaps the AudioWorklet is more productive but difficult to implement, or is the web audio api not needed by the javascript community? Explain why I should choose AudioWorklet according to the official recommendation?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-18 at 15:44You are asking many questions here. First, you'll be pleased to know that Safari has implemented AudioWorklets. See https://wpt.fyi/webaudio.
Second WebWorkers and Worklets are different things with different capabilities. AudioWorklets are Worklets so AudioWorklets only get Worklet things, not WebWorker things.
Third, yes, ScriptProcessorNode is deprecated, but there is still significant use. You can see this at https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/646. Compare that to https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/2263 for an AudioWorkletNode.
Certainly, AudioWorklets are the way to go, but when I want something quick and dirty and don't mind processing on the main thread, I use a ScriptProcessorNode. But if I'm doing something that would be production quality, I'd try to use AudioWorkletNode instead.
QUESTION
I'm new to React. I'm attempting to add an onClick event to a div element that will remove a className from another element. These elements are part of a loop in a map. I am attempting to use the useRef hook for this. I specifically don't want to toggle classNames, I want to remove it, and that's it. Then add it back with another onclick event from another element. This requirement is specific to my application. My current code removes the className from the last element, not the one I am targeting. Thanks in advance for any help!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-08 at 18:26Save the indicator of whether an item should have the class or not into the kitchenItems
state. Remove the ref.
QUESTION
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-20 at 04:53Have you seen this link: https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/bb8022a0-89ba-4753-b2df-6a48e67ca834/how-to-set-tabitem-background-color?forum=wpf According to the answers to the proposed question at the above link: "The TabControl binds the content of its ContentPresenter to the content of the selected TabItem. This would explain why the background of the Content is the same as the TabControl and not the TabItem"
QUESTION
Disclaimer, I'm rather new to WPF.
Currently, whenever I place another control onto the Designer, all other controls are completely erased from the XAML code. Consequently, I'm completely unable to do anything.
Should I be making a separate XAML file for each control? Or is there something weird going on otherwise?
For reference, here is my current XAML code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-19 at 05:03Yes the Window
element can contain a single element. but you can make it a container like Grid or any other container element that can have other elements as child. and inside that you can add as many elements as you want
QUESTION
Here is my problem. I developed a tkinter GUI for my project. However I am stuck with tkinter limitations. I developed python gui to create a virtual view for a red table as below. The window does not have any border or title. It is just put on the a picture background which is outside of the code.
However as you can see it is not lively enough for me. I want it to look like this:
Is there a way to do this in tkinter? I tried transparent backgrounds, however in Ubuntu transparent background with visible object is not possible. Also You cannot make different window shapes other than rectangle. What is your suggestions? Should I use another library. I really need an expert opinion about this.
Transparent background reference
Different window shape other than rectangle
My environment : Ubuntu 16.04 Python 3.5.2
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-02 at 16:08You can't specifically change the shape of a Tkinter Window, but you can create a canvas and design your own shape (then add your buttons and labels on this canvas if needed).
You can also take a look at PyQt or Kivy, but if you are confortable with Tkinter go with Canvas.
QUESTION
I imported useState from react but Its giving me the following error: "React Hook "useState" is called in function "navbar" that is neither a React function component nor a custom React Hook function." Does anyone see something wrong with my use?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-22 at 13:32Component names should start with capital letters:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install lively
Installer
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page