shouldly | Should testing for .NET—the way assertions should be | Assertion library
kandi X-RAY | shouldly Summary
kandi X-RAY | shouldly Summary
Should testing for .NET—the way assertions should be!
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of shouldly
shouldly Key Features
shouldly Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on shouldly
QUESTION
I wrote this unit test using XUnit and Shouldly. Please note that I replaced parts of the namespace, variable names, properties etc, as the customer is a large public organization.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-25 at 12:49You can achieve the same with the following assertions:
QUESTION
I'm working with a POCO class in .NET 5.0 that I need to serialize and deserialize to and from the browser, and this is in a library where I don't want to have to tell the users which serializers they must use.
So I'm trying to make it work with both Newtonsoft.Json and System.Text.Json.
My problem is that values stored in fields with type object aren't being deserialized into their original type, in System.Text.Json.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-25 at 18:30Dennis pointed to https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/31408 And that was closed as a duplicate of https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/29960.
So the answer is, you don't.
From the discussion on GitHub:
This is by design (and unlikely to change). Since the object type could map the JSON payload to any .NET type, while deserializing, the JsonSerializer returns a boxed JsonElement instead that points to the JSON token itself. We don't try to infer or guess the .NET type from the JSON payload during deserialization and hence, the caller (who has enough context) would need to turn the returned JsonElement into the expected .NET type.
If you are trying to what I am trying to do, create a POCO class in a utility library that can be serialized and deserialized by clients of the library without requiring any special effort on the users of the library, don't use object.
In my case, I have a field that might contain a string, int, double, decimal, or datetime. I'm going to have to replace that with a separate nullable field for each.
QUESTION
I'm using a Console App to do volume tests, in these tests I'm calling the JobTitles route that I created inside the API, in this case the controller that handles this route.
For the Post function, which I am using, I made use of the HttpClient PostAsJsonAsync()
method. As I already used this function in other code I didn't have many problems, but now it is returning the exception System.Net.Http.HttpRequestException: An error occurred while sending the request.
I'm not using any .Result
call as it may end up causing a deadlock; I also tried using .ConfigureAwait (false)
and it didn't work. I also tried to work with Easy.Common RestClient() but the same error occurs, I'm running out of options for what the error might be. I'm sorry but I can't figure out what the error is just by looking at the stack trace, I still didn't learn how figure it out.
I put the code here for better viewing as it is a little big:
https://repl.it/repls/JubilantMoccasinArrays
I tried to create a generic method since in the other code I made a Post for each Entity, taking advantage of the question, I would like to know if there is another one besides RestClient and HttpClient that I could use to send multiple calls without causing the shipments to be canceled due to many API entries, since it automatically cancels to avoid DDoS.
And the stack trace I get from RestClient:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-06 at 18:23So I believe your problem is on this line:
QUESTION
I'm new to ABP, and I did this oficial tutorial succesfully.
The thing is that then I added another class (Planta) and followed the tutorial again (without deleting The Book class), but even when I can create the table and feed data on it (verified), the application fails to load the table, and when I checked the swagger, I found this...
I was expecting it to be Planta instead of BookAppServicePlanta, and I can't find where did I messed things up.
Things I've tryed to solve this
- I have readed the most that I have been able to about ABP.
- I've contrasted every Planta file whith it's Book counterpart.
- I've dropped the database many times.
Here is what I did (details below):
- I created the class planta on
Acme.BookStore.Domain/Planta/Planta.cs
: - Added the entity to
Acme.BookStore.EntityFrameworkCore/EntityFrameworkCore/BookStoreDbContext.cs
- Mapped the entity to the table on
Acme.BookStore.EntityFrameworkCore/EntityFrameworkCore/BookStoreDbContextModelCreatingExtensions.cs
- Dropped the database, and deleted previous migrations
- Created a Data Seeder
Acme.BookStore.Domain/BookStoreDataSeederContributor_Plant.cs
- Added a new migration, and ran
Acme.BookStore.DbMigrator
- Created
Acme.BookStore.Application.Contracts/PlantDto.cs
- Added it to the
Acme.BookStore.Application/BookStoreApplicationAutoMapperProfile.cs
- created
Acme.BookStore.Application.Contracts/CreateUpdatePlantDto.cs
(and added it too to the automapper as shown on 8) ) - created the interface
Acme.BookStore.Application.Contracts/IBookAppServicePlanta.cs
- Implemented it on
Acme.BookStore.Application/BookAppServicePlanta.cs
- Ran the application
Extra Info: I created the pages for Planta and its forms (tutorial part 2 and 3), but even I've double checked those files, I dont belive the problem is on those files, since swagger problem.
I created the class planta on
...Acme.BookStore.Domain/Planta/Planta.cs
:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-20 at 07:00I am not familiar with ABP, but from a quick view to the documentation, it appears that you are not following the naming convention.
The application services should follow this naming convention: Entity
AppService
But it appears you copied/pasted the previous class BookAppService
and just added Planta
to the end. It should be PlantaAppService
instead.
QUESTION
I am using aspnetboilerplate 5.1.0.
In the ProjectName.Web.Tests
I have run into a situation that I cannot solve.
I have set up web tests for my controller using [Fact]
or [Theory]
.
When I attempt to run the tests using GetResponseAsString(string url, HttpStatusCode expectedStatusCode = HttpStatusCode.OK)
found in the webtestbase class. All the tests fail.
Here is an example of my Test:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-03 at 06:10I found the culprit. The problem I was experiencing was due to attempting to copy a project for web unit tests from one of the aspnetboilerplate project template repositories and updating all of the references and class names to match the names and namespaces in the destination VS solution.
I submitted a similar question on the aspnetboilerplate github account. https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/aspnetboilerplate/issues/5463.
Ultimately, here is what happened.
After going through the same process with a newer project. I found that In the
class file that would by default be named AbpProjectNameWebTestBase.cs
in the method
protected override IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder()
{
return base
.CreateWebHostBuilder()
.UseContentRoot(ContentRootFolder.Value)
.UseSetting(WebHostDefaults.ApplicationKey, typeof(AbpProjectNameWebModule).Assembly.FullName);
}
I mistakenly replaced AbpProjectNameWebModule
with AbpProjectNameTestModule
instead of AbpProjectNameWebMvcModule
. This was trying to use the Application Service Unit test project as the web project. Therefore it could not find any of the referenced URI's and therefore returned httpStatusCode.NotFound
.
After fixing this reference. I started getting exceptions that pertained to the public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env, ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
method.
These were things like adding app.UseAuthentication()
and app.UseAuthorization()
as well as needing to add a Middleware to provide a ClaimsIdentity and ClaimsPrincipal for the context.User (i.e. app.UserMiddleware()
)
Now, I am able to get my web unit tests to run as I had in previous versions.
QUESTION
How can I to make a unit test check that a list of object not contains a duplicate element based on some properties.
Here is what I tried to do:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-04 at 09:21Group by all the properties you want to check, and then test if all the groups have exactly 1 item.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install shouldly
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page