LookingGlass | A user-friendly PHP Looking Glass | TCP library

I am new to react and writing test case in react. I have two radio buttons (IPV4 and IPV6). I want to test that a user can select another radio button or not. I don't know which event listener to apply on radio button, is it change event or click event?

I broke down my problem into two parts: 1) I am checking whether I can select or deselect one radio button or not 2) I can select another radio button or not. I failed in my 1 part only so please help me. Here is my code and test case.

hi i am new to react testing and i am using react testing library and jest.please help me in writing test case for below code.

I have 7 protocols, and I want to be shown on the site. But the site shows only 4 protocols, although there are 7 protocols in the JSON file. I decided to check with a debugger, it passes 4 protocols without errors. But starting with the fifth protocol, such an error comes out.

I have error

During development, I introduced an error to my extension that causes gnome-shell to crash upon trying to load the extension with the following rather broadly phrased error message:

I've built a working surface shader (call it "wonderland") that renders as invisible unless a companion "lookingGlass" shader intersects with it from the viewpoint of the camera. Simple stencil shader arrangement.

Easy peasy.

I can add shader settings to specify a plane, or even just a minimum worldspace Z value, and use clip() to only render pixels on one side of that plane... (in other words, I could use that to trim the content that's allowed by the Stencil.)

What I want to do is use the stencil on surfaces "through the looking glass", (to reveal geometry that's inside the looking glass) and to always render those surfaces when they're on "our" side of the looking glass (to always show them if they're on this side of the looking glass portal). eg., if z<0, render if the Stencil Ref value is satisfied. if z>=0, render regardless.

Now, in Unity I can attach two materials to the MeshRenderer component (one with a stencil shader, one with a "plane cutoff" shader) - that works fine. It's pretty awesome, actually, at least visually. But while I haven't benchmarked it yet, I instinctively believe it's going to massively impact framerate if there are a number of objects, fairly complicated geometry, etc., set up with this arrangement.

(I can also manage shader attachment in code, and only do this when I expect something to transition, but I'm really hoping to get a unified shader out of this to avoid unnecessary draw calls.)