screenplays | A screenplay index backed by ElasticSearch | Plugin library
kandi X-RAY | screenplays Summary
kandi X-RAY | screenplays Summary
A simple screenplay search engine backed by elasticsearch.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- searchHandler handles search requests .
- Prints all the words in the given directory
- addHandler adds a captcha to the request .
- randomHandler returns a random search result .
- urlHandler returns an HTML script .
- pendingHandler handles all pending pending requests .
- scriptHandler handles the request .
- TrendingHandler returns a list of trending scripts .
- shortHandler handles a request .
- adderHandler adds a script to the database .
screenplays Key Features
screenplays Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on screenplays
QUESTION
I'm trying to code a screenplay app, but I'm running into a problem when I actually add information to my model. My models look like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-30 at 16:51__str__ must return string and you are returning integer i.e. PositiveSmallIntegerField.
Convert that value to string in your Block model as
QUESTION
I have a site I've started drafting but whilst my blocks are stretching only to 100% height of the browser for some reason the div containing the main content is going further down the page depending on the length of the content, despite including a scroll option.
What I'd like is the site to be max 100% height of the browser window, with a scroll bar in the div instead. I can't see where I'm going wrong.
I've tried adding height: 100% in a few different places, and attempted using max-height but to no avail. I had a browse on stackexchange but couldn't find an answer that worked for me unfortunately.
If anyone can help that would be great!
CSS:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-04 at 14:34In "index.html" :
Change
In "style.css":
QUESTION
If someone has provided a useful block of code to an R library, what is the appropriate role for them in package documentation?
Why it mattersI have seen contributor role given to such cases, but after reviewing the definitions of author and contributor, I believe author is the appropriate role. But there may be something else more appropriate (or perhaps both author/contributor)
What library of congress saysAuthor:
A person, family, or organization responsible for creating a work that is primarily textual in content, regardless of media type (e.g., printed text, spoken word, electronic text, tactile text) or genre (e.g., poems, novels, screenplays, blogs). Use also for persons, etc., creating a new work by paraphrasing, rewriting, or adapting works by another creator such that the modification has substantially changed the nature and content of the original or changed the medium of expression
Contributor:
Possible points of confusionA person, family or organization responsible for making contributions to the resource. This includes those whose work has been contributed to a larger work, such as an anthology, serial publication, or other compilation of individual works. If a more specific role is available, prefer that, e.g. editor, compiler, illustrator
- When a pull request is accepted, github will refer to the creator of the PR as a 'contributor'
- In day-to-day conversation, someone who provides useful input into a project could reasonably be called a 'contributor'
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-22 at 08:39I think this is a really interesting question and I wondered about this before.
Unfortunately, I don't think the two definitions you provide are as clear as you think. One problem is that based on how you read them, you could argue that both author and contributor are correct labels for someone writing code in a package. Just look at what an R package is in the categories used in the definitions:
You could either see a package as "work that is primarily textual in content, regardless of media type"---in which case someone writing on it would be an author---or "compilation of individual works"---in which case someone who added an individual work, such as a function, would be a contributor.
In the book "R packages" by Hadley Wickham, the section about the author has to say the following:
cre: the creator or maintainer, the person you should bother if you have problems.
aut: authors, those who have made significant contributions to the package.
ctb: contributors, those who have made smaller contributions, like patches.
(The original source of this seems to be this article: Hornik, Murdoch and Zeileis (2012))
Using the size of the contribution to determine if someone is an author or a contributor seems like a good way of dealing with the distinction.
Leaves the problem what a substantial contribution is. Ultimately I think that this has to be negotiated between the authors and contributors. Ideally, there is a guideline established by the creator/maintainer or the issue is discussed before a possible PR.
A rule of thumb I hereby propose is to ask if the core functions of the package would exist without the contribution of one person. If the answer is "no" then this person is an author. If the answer is "yes, but they wouldn't work as well" I think this person should be a contributor.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install screenplays
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
