github-actions | End-user GitHub Actions related to Cloud Native Buildpacks | Continous Integration library
kandi X-RAY | github-actions Summary
kandi X-RAY | github-actions Summary
github-actions is a collection of end-user GitHub Actions that integrate with Cloud Native Buildpacks projects.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- AddEntry adds entries to the index
- YankEntry removes entries from a repository
- VerifyMetadata verifies the metadata for the imageFn
- getNamespace gets a namespace for a given user
- GetContents mocks base method
- VerifyNamespaceOwner verifies that organization is owner .
- RequestAddEntry adds an entry to the index .
- RequestYankEntry requests a Yank entry to fetch an entry .
- ComputeMetadata computes buildpack metadata
- listOrganizations returns a list of org ids .
github-actions Key Features
github-actions Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 9License : Permissive (Apache-2.0)
Copyuses: docker://ghcr.io/buildpacks/actions/registry/add-entry
with:
token: ${{ secrets.BOT_TOKEN }}
owner: ${{ env.INDEX_OWNER }}
repository: ${{ env.INDEX_REPOSITORY }}
namespace: ${{ steps.metadata.outputs.namespace }}
name: ${{ steps.meta uses: docker://ghcr.io/buildpacks/actions/registry/yank-entry
with:
token: ${{ secrets.BOT_TOKEN }}
owner: ${{ env.INDEX_OWNER }}
repository: ${{ env.INDEX_REPOSITORY }}
namespace: ${{ steps.metadata.outputs.namespace }}
name: ${{ steps.met uses: docker://ghcr.io/buildpacks/actions/registry/verify-namespace-owner
with:
token: ${{ secrets.BOT_TOKEN }}
owner: ${{ env.NAMESPACES_OWNER }}
repository: ${{ env.NAMESPACES_REPOSITORY }}
namespace: ${{ steps.metadata.outputs.namespace }} Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on github-actions
QUESTION
my setup for codecov has worked well so far
- you can regular updates with each pr commits here
- I haven't change my repo settings
as I've inadvertently pushed a folder that I wasn't supposed to,
then I merged a pr to remove said folderhere is my codecov.yml
- on the aforementioned last pr linked above the github action ci complained with the log below
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 17:47Codecov has some heisenberg issues. If you don't have a token, please add one otherwise try to:
- Force-push to retrigger Codecov
- Rotate your token.
QUESTION
I want to make sure that any pull request in my Github repo follows the rules defined in .editorconfig (ASp.NET Core 5 C# project). I have found https://github.com/github/super-linter to lint the code using,
I have added the below linter.yml file in my workflow,
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 23:48Checking the Environment Variables from the Super Linter Github Action, the default value for the EDITORCONFIG_FILE_NAME file is .ecrc.
Therefore, if your file's name is .editorconfig you'll have to add it to the action arguments list with something like:
QUESTION
From my command line, if I execute the following two git log commands (to print the filenames in a commit), they return the expected output:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 08:05Your javascript code executes the equivalent of :
QUESTION
I have a workflow in GitHub that will execute a shell script, and inside this script I need to use gsutil
In my workflow yml-file I have the following steps:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-26 at 00:51The problem seemed to be that the environment variables were not inherited when running with sudo. There are many ways to work around this, but I was able to confirm that it would run with sudo -E. Of course, if you don't need to run with sudo, you should remove it, but I guess it's necessary.
(The reproduction code was easy for me to reproduce it. Thanks)
QUESTION
I'm currently testing Github Actions workflows on this repository.
ContextI'm trying to use this workflow (1st):
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-15 at 21:11No, you didn't miss anything in your workflows.
You just need a different token.
When you use actions/checkout, it uses the GITHUB_TOKEN for authentication, and according to the documentation it doesn't trigger a new workflow run:
When you use the repository's GITHUB_TOKEN to perform tasks on behalf of the GitHub Actions app, events triggered by the GITHUB_TOKEN will not create a new workflow run. This prevents you from accidentally creating recursive workflow runs.
To make it work, you need to generate a PAT (Personal Access Token), store it in your repository secrets, and use it in your checkout step:
QUESTION
I followed the guide here https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/actions/learn-github-actions/sharing-workflows-with-your-organization.
I successfully created a GitHub Organization shared workflow and can access this shared workflow if I create a public repo under the organization or my account (I am a member of the organization).
However, if I create a private repo I do not see the shared workflow. I am using the free-tier for my membership account and organization, so I'm not sure if that is the issue. There was no documentation stating that was a requirement.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-15 at 09:34You can also create workflow templates in the
.githubrepository and share them with other users in your organization.
QUESTION
I'm learning to deploy github actions to run multiple jobs with docker, and this is what I have so far:
github actions yml file is shown as follow. There are 2 jobs: job0 builds docker with Dockerfile0 and job1 builds docker with Dockerfile1.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-13 at 06:27It definitely sounds like you should not build two different images - not for CI, and not for local development purposes (if it matters).
From the details you have provided, I would consider the following approach:
- Define a Dockerfile with an
ENTRYPOINTwhich is the lowest common denominator for your needs (it can bebashorpython script.py). - In GitHub Actions, have a single job with multiple steps - one for building the image, and the others for running it with arguments.
For example:
QUESTION
I'm using react-app-rewired & customize-cra to setup a multi-project monorepo with shared TypeScript code, without ejecting from create-react-app (the setup is described in this answer). The layout is like:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-08 at 02:19The simple answer (from this thread) is that Heroku provides no proper way to run in a subdirectory. Any solution will be a hack, and those will vary depending on your project layout.
In my case, I got it working by putting a package.json in the root of the repo with:
QUESTION
I found out about a really nice GitHub Actions Feature called Environments. Using the appropriate syntax a Environment could also be created inside a GitHub Action workflow.yml like this:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-04 at 13:17The job workflow docs tell us that there's also a way of using expressions inside the url field:
QUESTION
I have a C++ library built using CMake, and it uses data pulled from https://www.dnd5eapi.co/. To do this, I have a Python script that runs and pulls the data using requests.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-02 at 22:32It turns out that on MacOS with GitHub Actions, there are multiple installed python interpreters and CMake wasn't finding the system version. I discovered this by adding python -m pip list to my cmake.yml before running the configuration for CMake. This gave me the Python location that GitHub Actions was using: /Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.9.4/x64, but CMake was finding an interpreter at /usr/local/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/bin/python3.9. So I changed the CMakeLists.txt from
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install github-actions
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
