git-user | Git plugin that allows you to save multiple user profiles | Plugin library
kandi X-RAY | git-user Summary
kandi X-RAY | git-user Summary
Git plugin that allows you to save multiple user profiles and set them as project defaults
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- initConfig initializes config
- NewUserProfileConfig creates a new UserProfileConfig from a git config
- listRun is the command to list all users .
- setRun handles the set command .
- remRun is a wrapper for remRun .
- stripFile strips lines from a file
- Version returns the git version
- addRun is the entry point for adding a profile
- editRun runs the edit command .
- GetUser returns the user and email addresses .
git-user Key Features
git-user Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on git-user
QUESTION
I'm setting up a deploy-on-git-push process on a remote Debian server. It is basically the common approach of having a bare repository with a post-receive hook which does a checkout to the web server's docroot, more or less.
I've used slightly simpler variations of this set up successfully for years, but this time around I'm complicating it by trying to separate ownership of the git repo and the site files between 2 different users. I don't want the user who can SSH in (the git push happens over SSH) to have write perms to the site, and vice-versa (the site user shouldn't have write perms to the git repository).
I have 1 user, let's call her
git-user
, who owns a bare git repository at/var/gitrepos/my_site.git
, and this user is the only user allowed to connect over SSH;I have a 2nd user, say
site-user
, who should own the checked-out files at/var/www/site
;
I push over SSH to the repo, and this means any post-receive hook runs as the user I SSH in as - git-user
in this case. So the post-receive hook can't do the checkout itself, as the site files would end up being owned by git-user
, not site-user
.
So my post-receive simply touches a trigger file, /var/run/deploy
. A separate script is run from site-user
's cron frequently, eg every minute, looking for that file. If it sees it, it does a checkout to /var/www/site
. The relevant part of that script looks something like:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-16 at 14:07Another option would be for the git-user
to create an archive that contains all the relevant files to be deployed (think of it as an artefact). This can be done in the post-receive hook before touching the trigger file. To create the ZIP/TAR, you can use the git archive
command which facilitates this step.
As soon as the cron-job runs and a deploy is triggered, the site-user
extracts the contents of the archive into /var/www/site
and removes the archive.
This way, the git-user
has no access to the webroot. At the same time, the site-user
does not even need read-access to the repository.
It is also possible to specify an alternative index-file with the environment variable GIT_INDEX_FILE
to circumvent the default location ($GIT_DIR/index
). But I don't know if Git needs write access to other files/folders as well.
QUESTION
Starting point:
- Ubuntu 20.04
- Gitolite (/home/git/)
- Webspace /var/www/webspace (usually owned by www-data:www-data)
- Git user (in www-data group and also tried without beeing in group)
I want to update the webspace as git user with post-receive to a www-data directory. I had it archived before I installed Gitolite, but it doesn't seem to work the same way as it did before (or I am missing something). To make it clear: post-receive is executed after pushing (which it's normally not on Gitolite) ... was a hard time too to archive that.
Edit: To make it clear: I want to archive that Git and www-data can access and modify the same files.
What Ive tried:
- chmod 777 -R /var/www/webspace (after this git can access but nginx returns with 403?)
- Adding Git-User to www-data group
- chown www-data:git -R /var/www/webspace
- chown git:www-data -R /var/www/webspace
- chown git:git -R /var/www/webspace
- chown www-data:www-data -R /var/www/webspace (with and without git inside group)(with and without 777)
- Executing post-receive manually (Operation not permitted)
- Executing post-receive manually as root (well ... works of course, but thats not the point)
- ... maybe also some steps more which Im maybe missing rn
What Ive noticed so far:
- On the contrary to Git, Gitolite checks the repo out with -rw------ (If i remember correctly), maybe that is why its not working with gitolite but with Git
The code (not that it would be important, but just to list everything):
- post-receive
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-24 at 06:04Try and follow "adding other (non-update) hooks" in order for Gitolite to call the relevant post-receive hook.
add this line in the
rc
file, within the%RC
block, if it's not already present, or uncomment it if it's already present and commented out:
QUESTION
The error I am getting:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-15 at 05:47I tried pulling etc.
pulling should have been enough to solve the issue.
But if your local history is correct (git log
), and you are the only one pushig to that repository, you could also simply force push
QUESTION
I am working on a script and am stuck at an error I am getting. I wanted to see if anyone could point me in the right direction. Basically I want a user to search AD and generate a report in.CSV file of the users in a particular group. I will show the script and the error below. Any advice would be most welcome. I know it can be done better and cleaned up but for now, it works.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-11 at 15:45You'll want to grab the textbox value from it's Text
property:
QUESTION
I'd like to use multiple Git server accounts (with any of GitHub, GitLab, BitBubket etc.).
The accounts are distinguished by their email addresses, name1@email1.com and name2@email2.org and git is setup to use these addresses in the relevant repositories
The following constraints apply to the 'change-account workflow':
- Without touching/changing SSH config files (e.g.
~/.ssh/config
, etc.) when repositories or servers are added/removed/changed. - Without requiring SSH agent running i.e. no
ssh-add ...
. - Without changing environment variables.
- Without changing the
git clone
instruction.
- Isolate the SSH keys used with git away from other SSH keys.
- Use the same 'change-account workflow' across all private and public repositories.
- The 'change-account workflow' is a one (1) step/command.
- The 'change-account workflow' is one (1) time per repository (i.e. not each time you move into work on the repository).
The initial repository setup (which is also one time activity) can involve more than one step. Any conventions/assumptions are acceptable as long as they don't break the constraints.
Unrelated questions:These are responses that do not satisfy the constraints.
They generally require changes to ~/.ssh/config
and/or involve the SSH agent daemon:
- handle-multiple-git-account
- using-multiple-git-accounts
- multiple-git-accounts-and-ssh-key
- multiple-github-accounts-ssh-config
- multiple-git-users-on-same-machine
- multiple-github-accounts-with-git-in-windows
- git-multiple-accounts-and-repository-problems
- ssh-config-to-access-multiple-repo-not-working
- multiple-github-accounts-on-the-same-computer
- can-i-specify-multiple-users-for-myself-in-gitconfig
- setting-up-ssh-config-file-for-multiple-codebase-accounts
- how-can-i-push-git-with-multiple-accounts-on-one-machine
- multiple-github-accounts-what-values-for-host-in-ssh-config
- how-to-configure-multiple-github-accounts-on-your-computer
- ssh-config-with-multiple-keys-for-multiple-gitlab-user-accounts
- github-multiple-accounts-permission-to-personalusername-reponame-git-denied-to
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-11 at 03:40Tested and working:
One-step "change-account workflow":You do this once after cloning - for any repository that has been setup to support developers who commit using multiple git accounts.
QUESTION
I have a git repo in /srv/git/mysite.git.
Workdir is set to
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-29 at 16:16Works for me, export GIT_DIR
was enough.
QUESTION
I am only able to able to unset (temporarily) my credentials with following
git config credential.helper ""
This overrides the store option and every time i am asked for username password but it is not a solution because I want to store my new credentials but as soon as i apply
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-16 at 19:58The easiest way to delete credentials for Git is to run a command like the following, which tells whatever credential helper you're using that the password is invalid and it should delete it:
QUESTION
I have the following Google Cloud Build pipeline:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-29 at 14:57Is there a reason you’re reapplying they deployment? Or are you doing that just one time? you could just use the built in command to replace / update the image instead of reapplying the config (if that’s what you’re doing)
kubectl set image deployment/my-deployment mycontainer=myimage
Or the other way is like you said, just use sed. (Basically what kustomize does) Bash into kubectl and then
cat deploy-file | sed “/latest/${_TAG_NAME}/“ | kubectl.bash apply -f -
QUESTION
I'm developing a file manager with Django. I'm using SFTP file server and django-storage package for managing files.
Well I developed some Apis for users to create and modify directories under their-own root-directory (which is abstract to the users) so far. Now I want to able users to upload their files onto their sub-directories or move files between those sub-directories but I don't know how?!
This is the model I'm using for file management:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-03 at 13:23In the last I added an extra CharField
to my model named upload_to
and I used it in user_directory_path
function to indicate sub-directory of the file.
QUESTION
I have recursively replaced many single word patterns in my code base. Before committing I need to check each for false replacements. It would help me a lot to have git add -p
use the format of what --word-diff
uses with git diff
, where only the changed words are marked and not the entire line.
Someone has asked the same here, but maybe it was implemented since? https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/git-users/7uO2OUJGvP0
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-26 at 09:27Since Git 2.9, you can use the property interactive.diffFilter
(as I mentioned below this answer)
But, any git -c interactive.diffFilter="git diff --color-words" add -p
would generate, since Git 2.17, an error message
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install git-user
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page