mayu | Mayu helps you to provision a cluster of bare metal machines with CoreOS Container Linux | Infrastructure Automation library

Since you're laying out your tableView using autolayout, you also need to ensure translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints is set to false.

SnapKit should be setting the tableView's translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints to false for you already.

Since you're laying out the cells manually (using frames in layoutSubviews). Setting the cells subview's translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints to false is likely not needed.

See Apple Docs here for translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints

If you're using EF 6.0 can you map the entity and then process them in batches with db.Records.Skip(n).Take(m)?

Use float:left; in your css style sheets.

Your problem is that .popup_container is a flexbox.

Simply change .popup_container to display: block, take the height off of .milky, and I believe it will behave as you would like.

Why?

The items within the .popup_container flexbox (such as your content, images, and footnote) automatically try to share all the vertical space, which is 100% of the display height, since .popup_container is a descendant of .popup_background, which has height: 100%. However, there is an exception. For some reason (if anyone knows why I'll be glad to include it), the text content takes precedence over the flexbox with the images. While the text gets to use up all the space it needs, the flexbox is reduced to barely anything. Your height property on the flexbox is obsolete because it is, itself, a flexbox item.

Also note: it's bad practice to have a fixed element the child of a fixed element, which is what you currently have. The inner element doesn't need to be fixed at all.

The problem is that you can't use delayed expansion in the for /f-options. You can only use the normal variable expansion %var%. The most easy solution in your case is to move the inner for /f in a function. Inside the function you won't have to worry about delayed expansion and will be able to use %result_count%.

Still there are some logical errors in your code:

• You don't unset your result variable at the end of each iteration in the outer loop. This will have the effect that the variable will only be set once (at the very first time) because after that if not defined result will never be taken (result contains its first value).
• The option skip=n will let the loop skip the first n lines. As you start with result_count=1 you'll never process the first line in file1.txt. In the description you said you'd like to compare all lines. You should then start with result_count=0. Unfortunately "skip doesn't like 0" (link is a question about the skip=0 problem and a solution for it).

After the changes, I've moved the paths for file1.txt and file2.txt in variables (resp. file1 and file2) to make it easily accessible and modifiable.