ebook-server | serve epub books for easy web access from my ereader | Media library

You should use the following command:

No, it is not possible. The password protects the whole Jupyter server. Once somebody has logged into the server, there's nothing that could stop them from accessing all of the notebooks stored in the file system.

Currently this is not supported, we only support connecting via the token. We know that this is not optimal for many users, but as of now the only way to enter in the password and authenticate the session is via the actual login HTML page that you see in the browser when you try to connect to a password protected Jupyter. So we don't yet have a way to automate that inside of VSCode. We're looking at adding support for this, but we will probably need changes from the Jupyter side to support this so it won't be in the immediate future.

I'm not sure if the problem is Jupyter, your network, or your local machine...

It's not clear how your files are structured, but if you have multiple "assignments", you can create archives for each

I believe that using of remote Jupyter Notebook is over-engineering in your case.

I see good way is pass necessary parameters to python program with well logging.

If you dont want to supply any headers in your HTTP request, just terminate it with \r\n\r\n sequence:

What happens is consequence of:

1. In the docker-compose.yml you've a typo in ip=0.0.0.0 which should be --ip=0.0.0.0 instead

2. Binding the host's folder into the container is overriding .bashrc. An easy change would be mounting into a subdirectory

3. You need to run bash in interactive mode (-i) so that .bashrc is properly read

As an example, changes on these points reflected in yourdocker-compose.yml:

You've tagged spring, so I assume you can use it.

Does your war get unpacked after deployment (e.g. by Tomcat)?

Use ClassPathResource#getFile()

Your problem is the String that gets returned by getFile(). It contains an exclamation mark (!) and a file: protocol. You could handle all that yourself and implement your own solution for this, but this would be reinventing the wheel.

Fortunately, Spring has a org.springframework.core.io.ClassPathResource. To get the file, simple write new ClassPathResource("filename").getFile(); In your case, you need to replace

The answer is in your question. The problem is with the design. The key to your solution is assign distinct purposes to each module, separate concerns and avoid mutual dependencies.

Other options you can explore include

• What seems like an anti-pattern here is that you have a dependency on a web module. This is unlikely to be ideal. You should avoid having module dependencies on units high up the stack. This is what I would try to change first: extract shared code from phonebook-web into one of the shared modules.

• Make smaller modules. Maven doesn't have a problem with that.
  If a depends on b for package c, and b depends on a for java package d, then you can extract packages c and d into a separate module on which both a and b have a dependency.

• Review whether you really need the separate modules.
  Maybe having phonebook-api, phonebook-server, and phonebook-web in separate modules isn't necessary after all. Unless you intend to reuse these modules in different applications, you may be better off using the single phonebook-web with all your current modules' code in it.