fail2ban | Traefik plugin on fail2ban middleware | Plugin library
kandi X-RAY | fail2ban Summary
kandi X-RAY | fail2ban Summary
This plugin is a small implementation of a fail2ban instance as a middleware plugin for Traefik.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- ServeHTTP dispatches to the firewall
- New creates a new http . Handler
- TransformRule returns a new RulesTransformed struct
- BuildIP converts a string to IP
- ImportIP imports the IP from the list
- StrToIP converts string to IP
- GetFileContent returns the content of a file .
- CreateConfig creates a config with default settings .
- isIPv4 returns true if the string is a valid IPv4 address .
fail2ban Key Features
fail2ban Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on fail2ban
QUESTION
I'm trying to parse the apache error log to grep the lines that corresponds to the "offending" IPs found in the fail2ban log.
I'm using a script in bash.
First I extract the offending IPs:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-04 at 18:10You could go with something like this:
QUESTION
I try tailing from my fail2ban.log file and cut from
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-29 at 08:21You are looking at buffering. It will print something eventually, but only when you have enough output for the buffer to be flushed. This is a common FAQ.
Anyway, you can easily refactor this to a single Awk script, which avoids the problem.
QUESTION
I have a wordpress+nginx in a docker container that is working perfectly through the browser, but when I try to send an http request via curl without headers the response is always empty
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-17 at 16:04This has nothing to do with docker or wordpress or something else.
It is your nginx-configuration solely that rejecting the request:
You have Curl
in your http-agent comparison in nginx-server.conf
:
QUESTION
My fail2 ban and my s-nail seem to be working separately, but not together. The following command sends emails successfully:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-30 at 12:53Answer instead of edit, since it is significant: A fix for the service crash is as follows.
QUESTION
I'm thinking about renting a server to host a web service. As much as I trust the hosting provider I still want to make sure nobody can access the secrets I'll be storing on that machine.
These are my current measures to boost the security (taken from here):
- Hosting provider sets everything up and provides me with the root password
- I connect to server
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-25 at 12:11What you did would prevent your hosting provider to connect via ssh, but as long as they have physical access to the machine they host, you could imagine they could unplug the machine at any time and just look into the hard drive directly by plugging it into another machine. If the machine is a virtual machine or have some way to have its hardware remotely controlled. They might not even have to shutdown it, and they could possibly directly see what lies in the memory as well...
Of course if it is a serious business they won't do that, but the point is, if you cannot see (literraly with your eyes) what is happening with the hardware then you have to trust.
Apart from the provider, increasing network security is always a good idea, one advice from my own provider was to add an ip whitelist to the ssh port firewall rule (of course you need to ensure you will hold access to the ip you put in the whitelist if you put the whitelist directly on the machine, otherwise you may lose access to your own machine. Lots of cloud provider provides a "security groups" feature in their administration console, if that is your case, you could use that)
QUESTION
I am trying to implement fail2ban inside my docker environment that uses my Nginx logs. <-- I may in the future just target the entire traefik
logs.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-01 at 12:41If /var/log/access.log
is a symlink to stdout, it's not going to be available in the other container: /dev/stdout
points to the stdout of the current process, so when fail2ban
attempts to read from it, it gets its own stdout, rather than the stdout of the nginx process.
If you want fail2ban
to be able to read the logs from nginx, you will need to write them to an actual file. If you also want them showing up on the container stdout, you can run something like a tail -f
in the background of the nginx container.
QUESTION
So, I've been reading issues for some days and don't seem to find a solution anywhere. I'm making some tests on a web server lab, I have set up two VMs (Ubuntu 20.04) server and client. On the server I have a PHP login app configured to give me this log whenever someone fails to log in.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-18 at 10:35OFFTOPIC: please move this question to serverfault or other better suitable site for that (this is offtopic for SO)
as for your issue, just stop to use catch-alls (.*
etc),
e. g. one correction to make it work could be:
QUESTION
I can't manage to find the error preventing fail2ban to match these lines:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-20 at 16:21The second message (did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN
) can be found if you would set mode aggressive
by sendmail-reject
jail (after this fix, e. g. v.0.10.6 and 0.11.2).
There was indeed no exact rule for the first message (rate limit exceeded
) matching this kind of message exactly, due to different handling on the arguments, but...
I fixed this now in f0214b3 on github.
Unless not released you can extend it by yourselves either in filter (copy & paste from github filter) or directly in jail:
QUESTION
Basic Overview
We are trying to set up Rate Limiting
on our server. we are using Nginx
as a webserver and fail2ban
for blocking IPs with Iptables
.
IPtables can block IPs if a request hits direct our Nginx server(in this case $remote_addr
is client IP).
But if it comes via some proxy server then proxy server passes client IP in X-Fordwarded-For
header and Iptables unable to detect that(in this case $remote_addr
is proxy server IP).
Is their some other ways we can block X-Fordwarded-For
header IP?
any help will be appreciable
IPtable IP block commmand - iptables -A INPUT -s 111.112.212.112 -j DROP
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-20 at 15:34You can not do that using iptables
(especially if the packets are encrypted due to https traffic).
But if you use fail2ban and nginx, you can try the action nginx-block-map. Just use variable $http_x_forwarded_for in the map (see action description) and provide it in log, fail2ban will monitor, so the filter would be able to capture it as an ID to ban.
QUESTION
I'm using a map configuration to block IP addresses with nginx + fail2ban
The sample configuration genrator code in fail2ban repo looks like this :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-06 at 07:07From the manual page:
If a source value matches one of the names of special parameters described below, it should be prefixed with the “\” symbol.
So it's unnecessary (but harmless) for values such as 127.0.0.1
, but it defends against using hostnames such as default
, hostnames
, volatile
or include
, which are considered "special parameters" within the map
block.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install fail2ban
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page