dragster | Better HTML5 drag events | Plugin library
kandi X-RAY | dragster Summary
kandi X-RAY | dragster Summary
HTML5 dragenter and dragleave events are crap. Dragster gives you sane new dragster:enter and dragster:leave events that behave just like mouseenter and mouseleave. Detecting when the user has dragged over a dropzone with child elements sucks. It usually involves transparent overlay elements, listening to the constantly-firing dragover event or nuking every other event with pointer-events: none. Dragster is tiny (417 bytes minified & gzipped), unobtrusive & doesn't do much - it just add a couple of event listeners for dragenter and dragleave on the elements that you specify. It never does anything automagically, and doesn't cancel the original events. Dragster works in latest stable Chrome, Firefox, Safari & Opera. It does nothing at all in IE 7-10 (IE doesn't support DOM event constructors). @catmanjan maintains a jQuery plugin version of Dragster if you'd like better cross browser support.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of dragster
dragster Key Features
dragster Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on dragster
QUESTION
The Clojure official spec doc states:
Most systems for specifying structures conflate the specification of the key set (e.g. of keys in a map, fields in an object) with the specification of the values designated by those keys. I.e. in such approaches the schema for a map might say :a-key’s type is x-type and :b-key’s type is y-type. This is a major source of rigidity and redundancy.
And in this SO question: clojure.spec human readable shape?
The following example is given:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jun-28 at 03:44Just for a moment, zoom back out and think about software development as a practice. We'll get to spec at the bottom.
As engineers, one of our most important skills is the ability to define and think in abstractions.Think about how function composition simplifies the construction of complex software. It simplifies the definition of a complex function by allowing us to think more broadly about what is happening. A nice benefit of this is that it also allows for the smaller functions which compose the larger one to be reused when writing similar, but slightly different, complex functions.
Of course, you don't need functions at all. You can write an entire project in one function. However, this is a bad idea primarily because it conflates the intent of a function with the specification of the function.
For example, a function make-car
calls build-engine
, build-drivetrain
, install-interior
, and a lot more. Sure, you can take the code from each of those and paste them inside make-car
. But the result is that you have lost abstraction. make-car
cannot be improved or changed except in the make-car
code itself. The code for how to build an engine cannot be improved or reused to make any other car. Why? Because the knowledge of how to build that engine for that particular specification of car is embedded in the make-car
function.
So, make-car
should not define how to build the engine (or any other components of the car); it simply specifies what components make up the car, and how they work together. The specifics of those components do not belong to the working knowledge embedded in make-car
.
In a similar fashion, spec allows you to define entities as abstractions. Could you embed the knowledge of an entity within a specification/schema? Certainly. Can you directly substitute the specification of the individual components into the entity definition itself? Yes. But in doing so, you are conflating the entity with the definition of its components. The loss is the same as with the above: you lose the abstraction of what the entity is, as now you must change the definition of the entity in order to change details about the entity that are really details of its components; and, you have lost the ability to reuse definitions for similar, but distinct, entities.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install dragster
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page