dockerfile | some personally made dockerfile

 by   mritd HTML Version: Current License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | dockerfile Summary

kandi X-RAY | dockerfile Summary

dockerfile is a HTML library typically used in Devops, Docker, RabbitMQ, Debian applications. dockerfile has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

This repository contains some dockerfiles of personally created docker images; it will be maintained for long periods if necessary.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              dockerfile has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 1977 star(s) with 663 fork(s). There are 74 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 1 open issues and 87 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 18 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of dockerfile is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              dockerfile has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              dockerfile has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              dockerfile is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              dockerfile releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of dockerfile
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            dockerfile Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for dockerfile.

            dockerfile Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for dockerfile.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            proxying from containerized production react to containerized flask
            Asked 2021-Jun-15 at 16:20

            I am trying to proxy requests from my containerized React application to my containerized Flask application.

            I was starting the application using npm start (in Docker), and I did not have any issues proxying requests. However, I learned that npm start is not a good way to proceed in production.

            Following the advice here: Run a React App in a Docker Container , I am able to start my containerized production React, but now the requests are not proxied.

            Within the React app, all requests are handled with axios and are formatted: "/api/v1/endpoint". It seems that others have had issues between "http://localhost:80/api/v1/endpoint" and "/api/v1/endpoint". I do not believe this is my issue, unless it arises only in the production environment.

            I have also tried changing my "proxy" address in package.json to the location of the dockerized flask container, and later to the name of the docker container, but I have not been able to make either solution work.

            If anyone can provide guidance on launching a containerized, production React app that proxies requests to a backend container, please advise.

            I am open to using a different server, if the procedures in "Run a React App in a Docker Container" need to be updated.

            I have looked these solutions:

            Proxy React requests to Flask app using Docker

            Flask, React in a Docker: How to Proxy

            Posting from React to Flask

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 16:20

            After digging around and trying a bunch of solutions, here is what worked:

            1.) I changed my docker file to run an nginx server:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67829521

            QUESTION

            How to run Sequelize migrations inside Docker
            Asked 2021-Jun-15 at 15:38

            I'm trying to docerize my NodeJS API together with a MySQL image. Before the initial run, I want to run Sequelize migrations and seeds to have the tables up and ready to be served.

            Here's my docker-compose.yaml:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 15:38

            I solved my issue by using Docker Compose Wait. Essentially, it adds a wait loop that samples the DB container, and only when it's up, runs migrations and seeds the DB.

            My next problem was: those seeds ran every time the container was run - I solved that by instead running a script that runs the seeds, and touchs a semaphore file. If the file exists already, it skips the seeds.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67765749

            QUESTION

            docker compose not exposing ports
            Asked 2021-Jun-14 at 18:42

            I have a dockerfile that works by itself, with

            docker build -t image_apache .
            docker run -tid -p 5000:80 --name=container_apache image_apache

            This works, and I can connect to its webserver with 127.0.0.1:5000

            But when I try to create a docker-compose.yml file to build and run the image with docker-compose, it doesn't appear to expose the port at all.

            Here is the docker-compose.yaml

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 18:42

            please try using docker-compose run -p 8080:80 deploy_test as run command can not expose/publish ports by itself i.e. you need to specify it manually. For more information regarding same, please refer to its official documentation here.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67974976

            QUESTION

            How to check whether an app in Docker container ignores Java memory options?
            Asked 2021-Jun-14 at 11:21

            There is a Java 11 (SpringBoot 2.5.1) application with simple workflow:

            1. Upload archives (as multipart files with size 50-100 Mb each)
            2. Unpack them in memory
            3. Send each unpacked file as a message to a queue via JMS

            When I run the app locally java -jar app.jar its memory usage (in VisualVM) looks like a saw: high peaks (~ 400 Mb) over a stable baseline (~ 100 Mb).

            When I run the same app in a Docker container memory consumption grows up to 700 Mb and higher until an OutOfMemoryError. It appears that GC does not work at all. Even when memory options are present (java -Xms400m -Xmx400m -jar app.jar) the container seems to completely ignore them still consuming much more memory.

            So the behavior in the container and in OS are dramatically different. I tried this Docker image in DockerDesktop Windows 10 and in OpenShift 4.6 and got two similar pictures for the memory usage.

            Dockerfile

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 03:31

            In Java 11, you can find out the flags that have been passed to the JVM and the "ergonomic" ones that have been set by the JVM by adding -XX:+PrintCommandLineFlags to the JVM options.

            That should tell you if the container you are using is overriding the flags you have given.

            Having said that, its is (IMO) unlikely that the container is what is overriding the parameters.

            It is not unusual for a JVM to use more memory that the -Xmx option says. The explanation is that that option only controls the size of the Java heap. A JVM consumes a lot of memory that is not part of the Java heap; e.g. the executable and native libraries, the native heap, metaspace, off-heap memory allocations, stack frames, mapped files, and so on. Depending on your application, this could easily exceed 300MB.

            Secondly, OOMEs are not necessarily caused by running out of heap space. Check what the "reason" string says.

            Finally, this could be a difference in your app's memory utilization in a containerized environment versus when you run it locally.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67953508

            QUESTION

            how to run simple minikube inside docker?
            Asked 2021-Jun-14 at 06:46

            I'm trying to follow instructions on this guide but under docker.

            I set up a folder with:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 06:46

            If you want to use kubernetes inside a docker container my suggestion is to use k3d .

            k3d is a lightweight wrapper to run k3s (Rancher Lab’s minimal Kubernetes distribution) in docker.k3d makes it very easy to create single- and multi-node k3s clusters in docker, e.g. for local development on Kubernetes.

            You can Download , install and use it directly with Docker. For more information you can follow the official documentation from https://k3d.io/ .

            To get the list of pods you dont' need to create a k8s cluster inside a docker container . what you need is a config file for any k8s cluster . ├── Dockerfile ├-- config └── main.py 0 directories, 3 files

            after that :

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67956247

            QUESTION

            How to clone a GitHub repo inside a directory mapped as a volume using docker-compose.yml?
            Asked 2021-Jun-13 at 21:34

            I have a docker-compose.yml similar to:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 21:06

            The right way to accomplish this is to write a custom docker file to and address it by docker compose.

            Here is an example:

            docker-compose file fragment*

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67962611

            QUESTION

            Docker: EACCES: permission denied, mkdir '/app/node_modules/.cache'
            Asked 2021-Jun-13 at 20:05

            I encountered a permission error while trying to build a docker container in a React app.
            I tried to make use of the community answers, but didn't help.
            Following related discussion I tried:

            • I get the current user: id -un
            • tried this: sudo chown -R myUser:myUser /usr/local/lib/node_modules
            • this also threw the same error: sudo chown -R ownerName: /usr/local/lib/node_modules
            • same with this: sudo chown -R $USER /usr/local/lib/node_modules
            • adding a user didn't help: sudo chown -R $USER /app/node_modules
            • tried to give permission installing this: sudo npm install -g --unsafe-perm=true --allow-root
            • another try was to remove node_modules and install specifying sudo: sudo npm install

            Adding this to docker-compose file, didn't help either:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-22 at 09:36

            You shouldn't be mounting your volumes. These lines should be removed from your docker-compose

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67639482

            QUESTION

            DPDK Compilation fails inside WSL2 Docker Desktop's containers
            Asked 2021-Jun-13 at 14:09

            I can't compile DPDK inside a docker container, running under WSL2 as VM (and windows 10 as the host machine).

            Background

            Trying to compile DPDK locally inside a wsl-container some DPDK lib that used to be built on remote native linux machines.

            The Dockerfile running the compilation had installed kernel headers, GNU toolchain and other various dependencies. The distribution is CentOS7.

            The containers are managed by Docker Desktop

            Versions are useless information here.

            The Problem

            Similar problems across DPDK versions. In DPDK 20.11, using the meason build-system, the file kernel/linux/meason.build:

            ../kernel/linux/meson.build:23:1: ERROR: Problem encountered: Cannot compile kernel modules as requested - are kernel headers installed?

            If I compile different DPDK versions of DPDK or building using other build-systems (makefiles), I am getting variants of the same error.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 19:36

            Inside your /lib/modules has no entry with WSL2 "uname -r" output

            Although WSL2 has /lib/modules/5.4.72-microsoft-standard-WSL2 (as a softlink), this soft link does not appear in the container.

            The solution is adding this line to the Dockerfile*:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67942680

            QUESTION

            Define specific docker-compose file to use for AWS Elastic Beanstalk Deployment
            Asked 2021-Jun-13 at 04:53

            Before I run eb create command, how can I tell Elastic Beanstalk to use a DIFFERENT docker-compose file?

            For example, my project directory:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 22:39

            You can't do this from command level. But I guess you could write container_commands script to rename your docker-compose file from docker-compose.dev.yml to docker-compose.yml:

            You can use the container_commands key to execute commands that affect your application source code. Container commands run after the application and web server have been set up and the application version archive has been extracted, but before the application version is deployed.

            UPDATE 12 Jun 2021

            I tried to replicate the issue using simplified setup with just docker-compose.prod.yml and Docker running on 64bit Amazon Linux 2 3.4.1 EB platform.

            docker-compose.prod.yml

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67879603

            QUESTION

            docker run immediately returns and does not show output of script.sh
            Asked 2021-Jun-12 at 20:59

            I have a simple echo.sh file with this: echo "hello" (with or without #!/bin/bash it gives the same error)

            this command immediately returns even though there is a echo.sh in this place in the container:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 20:59

            When you run an image, --entrypoint needs to be before the image name.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67952179

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install dockerfile

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/mritd/dockerfile.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone mritd/dockerfile

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:mritd/dockerfile.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular HTML Libraries

            Try Top Libraries by mritd

            mmh

            by mritdGo

            tpclash

            by mritdGo

            idgen

            by mritdGo

            gitflow-toolkit

            by mritdGo

            imgsync

            by mritdGo