dockerfile | some personally made dockerfile
kandi X-RAY | dockerfile Summary
kandi X-RAY | dockerfile Summary
This repository contains some dockerfiles of personally created docker images; it will be maintained for long periods if necessary.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of dockerfile
dockerfile Key Features
dockerfile Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on dockerfile
QUESTION
I am trying to proxy requests from my containerized React application to my containerized Flask application.
I was starting the application using npm start (in Docker), and I did not have any issues proxying requests. However, I learned that npm start is not a good way to proceed in production.
Following the advice here: Run a React App in a Docker Container , I am able to start my containerized production React, but now the requests are not proxied.
Within the React app, all requests are handled with axios and are formatted: "/api/v1/endpoint". It seems that others have had issues between "http://localhost:80/api/v1/endpoint" and "/api/v1/endpoint". I do not believe this is my issue, unless it arises only in the production environment.
I have also tried changing my "proxy" address in package.json to the location of the dockerized flask container, and later to the name of the docker container, but I have not been able to make either solution work.
If anyone can provide guidance on launching a containerized, production React app that proxies requests to a backend container, please advise.
I am open to using a different server, if the procedures in "Run a React App in a Docker Container" need to be updated.
I have looked these solutions:
Proxy React requests to Flask app using Docker
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 16:20After digging around and trying a bunch of solutions, here is what worked:
1.) I changed my docker file to run an nginx server:
QUESTION
I'm trying to docerize my NodeJS API together with a MySQL image. Before the initial run, I want to run Sequelize migrations and seeds to have the tables up and ready to be served.
Here's my docker-compose.yaml
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 15:38I solved my issue by using Docker Compose Wait. Essentially, it adds a wait loop that samples the DB container, and only when it's up, runs migrations and seeds the DB.
My next problem was: those seeds ran every time the container was run - I solved that by instead running a script that runs the seeds, and touch
s a semaphore file. If the file exists already, it skips the seeds.
QUESTION
I have a dockerfile that works by itself, with
docker build -t image_apache .
docker run -tid -p 5000:80 --name=container_apache image_apache
This works, and I can connect to its webserver with 127.0.0.1:5000
But when I try to create a docker-compose.yml file to build and run the image with docker-compose, it doesn't appear to expose the port at all.
Here is the docker-compose.yaml
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 18:42please try using docker-compose run -p 8080:80 deploy_test
as run
command can not expose/publish ports by itself i.e. you need to specify it manually. For more information regarding same, please refer to its official documentation here.
QUESTION
There is a Java 11 (SpringBoot 2.5.1) application with simple workflow:
- Upload archives (as multipart files with size 50-100 Mb each)
- Unpack them in memory
- Send each unpacked file as a message to a queue via JMS
When I run the app locally java -jar app.jar
its memory usage (in VisualVM) looks like a saw: high peaks (~ 400 Mb) over a stable baseline (~ 100 Mb).
When I run the same app in a Docker container memory consumption grows up to 700 Mb and higher until an OutOfMemoryError. It appears that GC does not work at all. Even when memory options are present (java -Xms400m -Xmx400m -jar app.jar
) the container seems to completely ignore them still consuming much more memory.
So the behavior in the container and in OS are dramatically different.
I tried this Docker image in DockerDesktop Windows 10
and in OpenShift 4.6
and got two similar pictures for the memory usage.
Dockerfile
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 03:31In Java 11, you can find out the flags that have been passed to the JVM and the "ergonomic" ones that have been set by the JVM by adding -XX:+PrintCommandLineFlags
to the JVM options.
That should tell you if the container you are using is overriding the flags you have given.
Having said that, its is (IMO) unlikely that the container is what is overriding the parameters.
It is not unusual for a JVM to use more memory that the -Xmx
option says. The explanation is that that option only controls the size of the Java heap. A JVM consumes a lot of memory that is not part of the Java heap; e.g. the executable and native libraries, the native heap, metaspace, off-heap memory allocations, stack frames, mapped files, and so on. Depending on your application, this could easily exceed 300MB.
Secondly, OOMEs are not necessarily caused by running out of heap space. Check what the "reason" string says.
Finally, this could be a difference in your app's memory utilization in a containerized environment versus when you run it locally.
QUESTION
I'm trying to follow instructions on this guide but under docker.
I set up a folder with:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 06:46If you want to use kubernetes inside a docker container my suggestion is to use k3d .
k3d is a lightweight wrapper to run k3s (Rancher Lab’s minimal Kubernetes distribution) in docker.k3d makes it very easy to create single- and multi-node k3s clusters in docker, e.g. for local development on Kubernetes.
You can Download , install and use it directly with Docker. For more information you can follow the official documentation from https://k3d.io/ .
To get the list of pods you dont' need to create a k8s cluster inside a docker container . what you need is a config file for any k8s cluster . ├── Dockerfile ├-- config └── main.py 0 directories, 3 files
after that :
QUESTION
I have a docker-compose.yml
similar to:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 21:06The right way to accomplish this is to write a custom docker file to and address it by docker compose.
Here is an example:
docker-compose file fragment*
QUESTION
I encountered a permission error while trying to build a docker container in a React app.
I tried to make use of the community answers, but didn't help.
Following related discussion I tried:
- I get the current user:
id -un
- tried this:
sudo chown -R myUser:myUser /usr/local/lib/node_modules
- this also threw the same error:
sudo chown -R ownerName: /usr/local/lib/node_modules
- same with this:
sudo chown -R $USER /usr/local/lib/node_modules
- adding a user didn't help:
sudo chown -R $USER /app/node_modules
- tried to give permission installing this:
sudo npm install -g --unsafe-perm=true --allow-root
- another try was to remove node_modules and install specifying
sudo
:sudo npm install
Adding this to docker-compose
file, didn't help either:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-22 at 09:36You shouldn't be mounting your volumes. These lines should be removed from your docker-compose
QUESTION
I can't compile DPDK inside a docker container, running under WSL2 as VM (and windows 10 as the host machine).
Background
Trying to compile DPDK locally inside a wsl-container some DPDK lib that used to be built on remote native linux machines.
The Dockerfile running the compilation had installed kernel headers
, GNU toolchain
and other various dependencies. The distribution is CentOS7
.
The containers are managed by Docker Desktop
Versions are useless information here.
The Problem
Similar problems across DPDK versions.
In DPDK 20.11, using the meason
build-system, the file kernel/linux/meason.build
:
../kernel/linux/meson.build:23:1: ERROR: Problem encountered: Cannot compile kernel modules as requested - are kernel headers installed?
If I compile different DPDK versions of DPDK or building using other build-systems (makefiles), I am getting variants of the same error.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 19:36Inside your /lib/modules
has no entry with WSL2 "uname -r" output
Although WSL2 has /lib/modules/5.4.72-microsoft-standard-WSL2
(as a softlink), this soft link does not appear in the container.
The solution is adding this line to the Dockerfile
*:
QUESTION
Before I run eb create
command, how can I tell Elastic Beanstalk to use a DIFFERENT docker-compose
file?
For example, my project directory:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 22:39You can't do this from command level. But I guess you could write container_commands script to rename your docker-compose
file from docker-compose.dev.yml
to docker-compose.yml
:
You can use the container_commands key to execute commands that affect your application source code. Container commands run after the application and web server have been set up and the application version archive has been extracted, but before the application version is deployed.
UPDATE 12 Jun 2021
I tried to replicate the issue using simplified setup with just docker-compose.prod.yml
and Docker running on 64bit Amazon Linux 2
3.4.1 EB platform.
docker-compose.prod.yml
QUESTION
I have a simple echo.sh
file with this: echo "hello"
(with or without #!/bin/bash
it gives the same error)
this command immediately returns even though there is a echo.sh
in this place in the container:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 20:59When you run an image, --entrypoint
needs to be before the image name.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install dockerfile
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page