quick-select | jQuery plugin for quick selection | Plugin library
kandi X-RAY | quick-select Summary
kandi X-RAY | quick-select Summary
A jQuery plugin for quick selection of common options in select boxes. Selectual.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of quick-select
quick-select Key Features
quick-select Examples and Code Snippets
private void quickSelect(int[][] points, int k, int left, int right) {
if (left >= right) {
return;
}
// choose pivot index, could be randomly
int pIdx = (right - left) / 2 + left;
int[] pivot =
private int quickSelect(int[] array, int left, int right, int target) {
if (left == right) {
return left;
}
int pivot = array[right];
int j = left;
int k = right - 1;
while (j <= k) {
private static int quickselect(int[] array, int low, int high, int k) {
while (low <= high) {
int partitionIdx = partition(array, low, high);
if (partitionIdx == k - 1) return array[k - 1];
else if (partitionIdx > k - 1)
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on quick-select
QUESTION
I am implementing the quick-select algorithm to get the k
th element in an array, and I am stuck at a place where I don't know how to resolve. Here is my code that doesn't work:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 06:59If k < partitionIndex, only check the left partition, else only check the right partition.
QUESTION
I need to be able to auto select humans in a big number of images. I know their coordinates, width and height, but would ideally prefer to have a more humanoid selection, and it seems to work great via normal object selection via the interface. Now I am wondering if I can do it with Photoshop scripting? Any clues appreciated!
To clarify I'm talking about the Object Selection Tool introduced recently here.
Thanks everyone!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-21 at 03:46I managed to get this working. In case anyone is interested:
Assuming the coordinates of the bounding box (top, left, bottom, right) are found.
QUESTION
I have been trying to understand the Quick-Select algorithm and I have found two different values for the complexity of the worst-case running time.
For example, This website claims that worst-case time complexity is Θ(n^2), whilst GeeksforGeeks claims that it's O(n^2).
Can someone help me understand which one is correct and why this is the case?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-08 at 22:39Both are correct, but using Θ is a stronger statement. Big O notation gives an asymptotic upper bound, whereas big Theta notation gives the actual asymptotic growth rate.
As an analogy, imagine Alice and Bob are both counting somebody's legs. Alice says legs = 2
, and Bob says legs ≤ 2
. Alice and Bob are both correct, but Alice's statement is stronger.
In informal use, it's quite common to write O when you could have written the stronger statement with Θ, just because most people's keyboards don't have a Θ key.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install quick-select
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page