smart | android app with proxy and firewall support | Proxy library

I had a similar problem with another module.

The solution I found was to update both node (to v16) and npm (to v8).

For Node, I used brew (but nvm should be OK).

For npm, I used what the official doc says :

npm install -g npm@latest

It appears 1.10.9-stable version has a problem and is returning a -rpc error. GETH 1.10.8-stable version works fine when running the geth command with --rpc

To deploy and test your smart contracts on RSK regtest yourhardhat.config.js should look as follows:

Payment args in EGLD are auto-filled from the call value you've already specified in the transaction, so you do not need to pass them as argument.

Therefore, your call data in this case would be myEndpoint@aa, without the payment arg.

As a side note, if this would've been an endpoint accepting another token than EGLD, you would've had to specify the token and amount in the data field, like: ESDTNFTTransfer@TokenIdentifier_in_hex@TokenNonce_in_hex@TokenValue_in_hex@Contract_address_in_hex@myEndpoint_in_hex@aa.

The ESDTNFTTransfer function sends any type of ESDT token, with or without nonce. If the token doesn't have a nonce (fungible), you can either pass 00 as nonce or leave the nonce space empty, like @TokenName_in_hex@@TokenValue_in_hex. Mind the fact that in order to use this function, you would have to compose a transaction with the destination set as yourself. The actual address of the destination would be contained in the data field in place ofContract_address_in_hex, making it a parameter of the ESDTNFTTransfer function.

If the endpoint accepted two tokens for example, then you could've used MultiESDTNFTTransfer@Contract_address_in_hex@02@Token1Identifier_in_hex@Token1Nonce_in_hex@Token1Value_in_hex@Token2Identifier_in_hex@Token2Nonce_in_hex@Token2Value_in_hex@myEndpoint_in_hex.

And yeah, you can always check the Elrond docs on ESDT Tokens / NFT Tokens for more details.

In the Elrond blockchain, each token is configured to have a specific number of decimals (between 0 and 18). EGLD is configured to have 18 decimals. So, 1 EGLD is actually the denominated representation of the integer value of 10^18 actually.

Using this example, if you have to send 1.5 EGLD, the un-denominated integer value is 1.5 * 10^18 = 1500000000000000000.

If you send the tx from erdpy or most of any other programmatic way, you should pass the un-denominated value. If you send the tx from web wallet and such user-friendly interfaces, there's a good chance that the values are already denominated automatically, so you sending 1.5EGLD will be automatically denominated to the actual 1.5 * 10^18 value, which is what the destination address/SC will receive as payment amount.

Here is another tidyverse solution with using str_detect to determine where to convert to NA for the date columns. Then, we can use the same type of function on VAR1 and VAR2.

Apparently, there is a reference to that, in a github issue - rust-lang/rust#63104:

This conflicts with the existing blanket impl in core.

Detecting the codec doesn't necessarily detect whether the system can support Dolby Atmos

Correct.

What reliable way is there to detect if your system will truly support Dolby Atmos whether its with a receiver or a Dolby Atmos compliant sound bar.

Unfortunately, this undetectable from the browser.

The browser itself and even the OS doesn't always know what is downstream. Sorry for the bad news!

Would that do the trick?