code-generator | 自定义代码自动生成器 , 目前包含Java数据库Mapper , Dao , Service层模板 | Generator Utils library

I have a Gatsby page component and try to query some data from GraphCMS. I added the page component inside a folder:

I have the following example of PDF417 barcode:

which can be decoded with online tool like zxing

as the following result: 5wwwwwxwww0app5p3pewi0edpeapifxe0ixiwwdfxxi0xf5e�¼ô���������¬‚C`Ìe%�æ‹�ÀsõbÿG)=‡x‚�qÀ1ß–[FzùŽûVû�É�üæ±RNI�Y[.H»Eàó¼åñüì²�tØ¿ªWp…Ã�{�Õ*

or online-qrcode-generator

as 5wwwwwxwww0app5p3pewi0edpeapifxe0ixiwwdfxxi0xf5e~|~~~~~~~~~~d~C`~e%~~~~;To~B~{~dj9v~~Z[Xm~~"HP3~~LH~~~O~"S~~,~~~~~~~k1~~~u~Iw}SQ~fqX4~mbc_ (I don't know which encoding is used to encode this)

The first part of the encoded key that contains barcode is always known and it is 5wwwwwxwww0app5p3pewi0edpeapifxe0ixiwwdfxxi0xf5e

The second part of it can be decoded from the base64string and it always contains 88 bytes. In my case it is:

Frz0DAAAAAAAAAAArIJDYMxlJQDmiwHAc/Vi/0cpPYd4ghlxwDHflltGevmO+1b7GckT/OZ/sVJOSRpZWy5Iu0Xg87zl8fzssg502L+qV3CFwxZ/ewjVKg==

I'm using Swift on iOS device to generate this PDF417 barcode by decoding the provided base64 string like this:

I've got a bunch of generated types (via GraphQL codegen) that look like this:

I have my AppSync api set up using aws-cdk and am not using their amplify framework. I am trying to figure out how / if I can generate Typescript definitions from my AppSync schema.graphql file while not using amplify, i.e. no access to amplify codegen command. I did try installing and running it, but I assume amplify expects files to be located in certain directories, hence failing.

I looked into https://graphql-code-generator.com but it wont work due to special types AppSync uses like AWSDateTime, a work around for this is to have api published and get schema from a graphql endpoint, but this is not ideal i.e. I'd like to be able and generate these types locally without publishing the schema.

Is this doable?

We have a graphql query that is executed like this:

I have developed a domain-based modeling tool and code-generator that provides the ability to capture domain models per DDD and automatically generates ASP.Net Web API microservices.

I also created an Azure B2C CLI tool that uses MS Graph API to programmatically generate an Azure B2C AD Application for each Web ASP.NET Web API of which includes all possible scopes that are applied to protect some of the generated Web API operations.

As some of these generated API services often interact with other generated services via REST and/or gRPC, the Azure B2C CLI tool also adds the list of dependent API permissions that would be required by each Web API in order to integrate with the other Web API.

My Azure B2C CLI tool works great and is creating/updating the underlying Azure B2C Web/API application per each domain service within the Home Tenant along with the necessary Service Principal.

Currently I still need to log into the Azure Portal in order to grant the API permissions per each B2C Application.

My Question is : Is it possible to automate the granting of the API Permissions using the B2C Application that I am using to create these same B2C Web/API applications ?

It seems like this should be possible as the Azure B2C CLI tool's B2C Application is the owner of these created Apps.

To help illustrate and support my question I have included some screen shots below.

To begin, the following image shows the permission set that my Azure B2C CLI tool runs under in order to create the other B2C applications for each Web API via MS Graph API.

On each pass, the Azure B2C CLI tool processes a particular domain model to understand the definition for each domain service within that model and will automatically create a series of B2C applications within Azure B2C per each service in a particular domain model.

The following domain model has 4 domain services which results with 4 B2C Apps being generated by my Azure B2C CLI tool as illustrated below ..

The Azure B2C CLI tool creates as many permission scope items per API operation and adds that to the underlying API OAuthPermissionScopes. Here is a few examples of generated permission scopes services for "WorkSpace" and "SharedServices" Web API's...

The Azure B2C CLI also adds any API permissions to each generated B2C API Application. The following example shows that "CoreServices" API requires permissions from both the "SharedServices" App API and the "WorkSpace" App API

Once that is completed I can log into the Azure Portal and Grant these permissions, manually, per each API.

Instead of granting these manually I would like to programmatically grant these permissions via MS Graph within the Azure B2C CLI tool I've created.

The code-generator domain modeling tool will be producing 100's upon 100's of services so I want to automate securing the generated domain services as much as possible, including granting of API permissions.

What is the MS Graph API to allow me to fully automate this process within my Azure B2C CLI tool?

I am wondering if arrays defined in graphql queries/mutations, which can be either singletons or tuples in valid graphql implementation get converted to strict array types by graphql-codegen. Is this is by design ?

Given this schema:

I want to use serving api which is the part of the knative serving repo to create serving application. Since i'm writing a custom controller, i need to make use of Go client. I'm finding it difficult to generate boiler plate code using the code-generator. I'm following the below mentioned blog on how to do it.

1. https://insujang.github.io/2020-02-13/programming-kubernetes-crd/#write-template-code
2. https://blog.openshift.com/kubernetes-deep-dive-code-generation-customresources/

But i couldn't achieve it. Any help is appreciated.

Scenario

When a user is authenticated (isAuthenticated booelan ref):

1. Check if a user has preferences by a graphql call to the backend (useViewerQuery)
2. If there are no preferences for the user set the default (useSetPreferenceDefaultMutation)

Problem

Both the query and the mutation work correctly in the graphql Playground and in the Vue app. They have been generated with the graphql codegenerator which uses useQuery and useMutation in the background.

The issue we're having is that we can't define the correct order. Sometimes useSetPreferenceDefaultMutation is executed before useViewerQuery. This resets the user's settings to the defaults and it not the desired behavior.

Also, on a page refresh all is working correctly. However, when closing an reopening the page it always calls useSetPreferenceDefaultMutation.

Code