Hunter | concurrent framework to develop compile plugin | Plugin library

In Node.js event queues, and code like "new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, t));", is the setTimeout() evaluated NOW, in the microqueue for Promise resolves, or where?

The call to setTimeout is evaluated "now." (The setTimeout callback is called later as appropriate, during the time phrase.) When you do new Promise(fn), the Promise constructor calls fn immediately and synchronously, during your call to new Promise(fn). This is so the function (called an executor function) can start the asynchronous work that the promise will report on, as your two examples (one starts the work by calling setTimeout, the other by calling setImmediate.)

You can easily see this with logging:

Since pygame.Rect is supposed to represent an area on the screen, a pygame.Rect object can only store integral data.

The coordinates for Rect objects are all integers. [...]

The fraction part of the movement gets lost when the movement is add to the position of the rectangle.
If you want to store object positions with floating point accuracy, you have to store the location of the object in separate variables and to synchronize the pygame.Rect object. round the coordinates and assign it to the location (e.g. .topleft) of the rectangle:

You should read this like so:

• the data: The parameter, the returned value, etc.
• is owned by X: X is responsible to clean up (in most cases, this means calling g_object_unref on the data) the data.

With this in in mind:

1. The data is owned by the caller of the function: The gtk_application_window_new function works this way (as far as the application parameter is concerned). This means that memory management (i.e g_object_unrefing application) is to be done by the caller of gtk_application_window_new. See this example here. Notice that the caller of gtk_application_window_new, here main (through activate) is managing the reference count: it is calling g_object_unref on app.

2. The data is owned by the called function: The gtk_application_window_new function works this way (as the returned value is concerned). This means that memory management of the returned GtkWidget instance is to be done by gtk_application_window_new itself. So no need to call g_object_unref yourself. See this example here: window is created by gtk_application_window_new but is never explicitly freeed. This id because the called function (here gtk_application_window_new) is taking care of this.

3. The data is owned by the instance: The gtk_builder_get_object works this way (as far as the returned value is concerned). This means that the memory management of the GObject* returned is to be performed by the builder instance itself. Because of this, calling g_object_unref is not wanted. See this example here: The builder object is managed, but now the widgets returned by calls to gtk_builder_get_object. Even if written in C, GTK is object oriented. This means that instance, here, means the same as a class instance in most OO language.

Goes like this:

make frame (yours is in xml) > OnLoad event handler > register for events > event fired > handle events

1) You don't need the require or the core.lua:

WoW has its own explicit ordered loading process that uses toc files and includes in xml.

Your toc file probably looks like:

To solve your specific issue, you can generate dummy variables to run your desired clustering.

One way to do it is using the dummy_columns() function from the fastDummies package.

You are missing a class that matches the list of Species that your JSON contains:

The pyinstaller documentation states:

The list of data files is a list of tuples. Each tuple has two values, both of which must be strings:

• The first string specifies the file or files as they are in this system now.

• The second specifies the name of the folder to contain the files at run-time.

That means that if you do this:

If your version of SQLite is 3.31.0+ you can define the column power as a GENERATED column:

If you didn't have any condition on employee ID at all you'd end up with records where a self-match had occurred, e.g. the results would show "Gracie Gardner was hired on the same day as Gracie Gardner"

We could then put ON e1.employee_id <> e2.employee_id - this would prevent Gracie matching with Gracie, but you'd then find "Gracie Gardner was hired on the same day as Summer Payne" and "Summer Payne was hired on the same day as Gracie Gardner" - i.e. you'd get "duplicate records" in terms of "person paired with person", each name being mentioned both ways round

Using greater than prevents this, and effectively means that any given pair of names only appears once. Because Gracie's ID is less than Summer's, you'll get Gracie in e1 paired with Summer in e2 but you won't get Summer in e1 paired with Gracie in e2

Another way of visualizing it is with a square/matrix