jetcd | official java client for etcd v3 | Key Value Database library

by etcd-io Java Version: jetcd-0.6.1 License: Apache-2.0

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | jetcd Summary

jetcd is a Java library typically used in Database, Key Value Database applications. jetcd has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has build file available, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub, Maven.

jetcd is the official java client for etcd v3. Note: jetcd is work-in-progress and may break backward compatibility.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

jetcd has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 989 star(s) with 303 fork(s). There are 50 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 6 open issues and 376 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 216 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of jetcd is jetcd-0.6.1

Quality

jetcd has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

jetcd has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

jetcd code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

jetcd is licensed under the Apache-2.0 License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

jetcd releases are available to install and integrate.

Deployable package is available in Maven.

Build file is available. You can build the component from source.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

jetcd saves you 4596 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 9713 lines of code, 779 functions and 173 files.

It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed jetcd and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into jetcd implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Main entry point
Convert API watch event to client event
Configure the endpoint builder
Accepts the event
Initialize ecl connection
Creates a temp directory
Creates the command
Start the cluster
Starts the etcd container
Returns true if this sequence starts with the specified prefix
Add a new client interceptor
Role revoke permission
Compares this object to another
Translates exception into ECDcdException
Add user
Change the user s password
Helper method to keep alive
Creates a new watcher
Creates a thread factory that creates threads
Converts the given AlarmMember to AlarmMember
Closes the lease
Takes a snapshot of the blob
Close all resources
Executes a task
Converts a Permission to a Permission object
Grant a specific permission

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

jetcd Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for jetcd.

jetcd Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for jetcd.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on jetcd

Leader election with: Etcd vs Zookeeper vs Hazelcast

C# - etcd GRPC Client Basic Auth

QUESTION

Leader election with: Etcd vs Zookeeper vs Hazelcast

Asked 2019-Sep-05 at 11:56

We are choosing the best option for implementing a leader election for our service (written in Java) comprised of multiple (e.g., 3) instances for high availability. Our goal is to have only a single instance active at any given time.

Would be great to hear your opinion about the following options:

1) Hazelcast. Using "quorum" and a lock we can implement a leader election. However, we can run into a split-brain problem where for some time two leaders may be present. Also, it seems that Hazelcast does not support SSL.

2) Zookeeper. We can implement leader election on top of a Zookeeper ensemble (where a ZK node is run on each instance of our service). Does Zookeeper provide better consistency guarantees than Hazelcast? Does it also suffer from the split-brain problem?

3) Etcd. We can use the Jetcd library which seems like the most modern and robust technology. Is it really better in terms of consistency than Zookeeper?

Thank you.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Sep-05 at 11:56

1) Hazelcast, by version 3.12, provides a CPSubsystem which is a CP system in terms of CAP and built using Raft consensus algorithm inside the Hazelcast cluster. CPSubsytem has a distributed lock implementation called FencedLock which can be used to implement a leader election.

For more information about CPSubsystem and FencedLock see;

Hazelcast versions before 3.12 are not suitable for leader election. As you already mentioned, it can choose availability during network splits, which can lead to election of multiple leaders.

2) Zookeeper doesn't suffer from the mentioned split-brain problem, you will not observe multiple leaders when network split happens. Zookeeper is built on ZAB atomic broadcast protocol.

3) Etcd is using Raft consensus protocol. Raft and ZAB have similar consistency guarantees, which both can be used to implement a leader election process.

Disclaimer: I work at Hazelcast.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53605172

QUESTION

C# - etcd GRPC Client Basic Auth

Asked 2018-Jun-02 at 19:33

I am trying to implement a C# GRPC client for etcd v3+.I am able to connect via no auth and channel ssl auth.However, I am trying to figure out basic authentication mechanism as well.Here's my implementation till now.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-May-29 at 09:48

I solved it by referring to REST api docs here.

Add a private property.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50572412

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install jetcd

The project can be built with Apache Maven:.

Support

It recommmonds building the project before running tests so that you have artifacts locally. It will solve some problems if the latest snapshot hasn't been uploaded or network issues.

Find more information at: